Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

Turning Rotors - Necessary or Needless?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2004, 11:05 PM
  #1  
D'oh
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
D'oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Turning Rotors - Necessary or Needless?

Well, just took a coworker to the local Nissan dealer to get the brakes on her XTerra replaced. As usual, the dealer said that the rotors needed to be turned or she might feel pulsing during braking. I never got to see the rotors before hand, but afterwards they looked very nice.

Now, I've been to 5 track days, and have replaced my rear pads twice (on my third set now) and my front pads once. In that time I've never turned the rotors, although I'm starting to see a significant groove on the front disks where the pads rub. The groove is probably 0.03" deep or so, and is consistent over the swept area of the pad.

Since I never got to see the brakes on my coworker's truck I don't know how they compared to mine, but since she doesn't track her XTerra, I'm guessing her rotors were not as worn as mine are.

So, after all this, I have a couple questions:
1. What exactly is turning the rotor supposed to accomplish?
2. How do you know they need to be turned?
3. If you don't turn them when they need it, what happens?

My thoughts are basically that turning the rotors is something any shop recommends just so they can pad their fee (whether the rotor actually needs it or not), but I'd like some feedback so I can better judge when I should quit doing my own brake jobs and have someone turn my rotors.

EDIT: From the few articles I've read so far, it looks like most performance brake companies actually recommend that you do not have your rotors turned. They want you to keep as much rotor mass and strength as possible.
END EDIT

EDIT AGAIN:
Here's pretty good article:
http://www.aa1car.com/library/2003/bf110322.htm
END EDIT

Any thoughts?

-D'oh!

Last edited by D'oh; 09-24-2004 at 11:17 PM.
Old 09-25-2004, 04:49 AM
  #2  
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Q45tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Modern rotors have a flatness [across the face parallelism] spec of 0.001", older specs back in 90-2000 were 0.0028" for most Nissans.

Anything greater can be felt as a quiver in the steering wheel when brakes are lightly appplied at 65-75 mph.......brake pedal pulsation requires an out of spec flatness great than 0.003".

A individual driver sensitivity compliant issue.

Most Nissan brakes are designed for average insensivite drivers and the rotors are too thin and light weight for durabilty. For people who might make a panic stop from 75 mph one every 5 years. Not someone who might engage in track events or serious mountain driving near the limit.

The Extera is kind of self regulating in those regards.

Common on Nissan to resurface the rotors at least once per year to get rid of vibrations.

On my Q, I resurface every 7-8,000 miles but I am a perfectionist regarding brake feel........most look at me as a nut.

People with cars with superior brake designs [Brembo big thick rotors] are lucky...........they can go a year between resurfacing.

Last edited by Q45tech; 09-25-2004 at 04:51 AM.
Old 09-25-2004, 05:14 AM
  #3  
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Q45tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Q45tech
Modern rotors have a flatness [across the face parallelism] spec of 0.001", older specs back in 90-2000 were 0.0028" for most Nissans.

Anything greater can be felt as a quiver in the steering wheel when brakes are lightly appplied at 65-75 mph.......brake pedal pulsation requires an out of spec flatness great than 0.003".

A individual driver sensitivity compliant issue.

Most Nissan brakes are designed for average insensivite drivers and the rotors are too thin and light weight for durabilty. For people who might make a panic stop from 75 mph one every 5 years. Not someone who might engage in track events or serious mountain driving near the limit.

The Extera is kind of self regulating in those regards.

Common on Nissan to resurface the rotors at least once per year to get rid of vibrations.

On my Q, I resurface every 7-8,000 miles but I am a perfectionist regarding brake feel........most look at me as a nut.

People with cars with superior brake designs [Brembo big thick rotors] are lucky...........they can go a year between resurfacing.
As to resurfacing if you turn them when they are only 0.005" out you have the ability to resurface 8 times [less natural wear] befre you reach the limit [1mm wear limit].

The longer you wait the more you have to remove to return to spec. The usual metal thickness is 10mm per side so 1mm is 10% and the edge metal is 60% of total rotor weight so from brand new to fully worn is a 6% reduction in total weight! This weight reduction will increase rotor temperature by roughly 6%.

A single 80 mph panic stop might raise rotor from 100F to 600F with worn out rotors it might be 636F even 650F.

The factory assumes worn out rotors equal [go along with] worn out thin brake pads which allow more heat to transfer [radiate] to the brake fluid thus the potential for fluid boiling and brake fade much earlier with worn rotors and pads.

The pads are 9-10 mm thick when new [insulating the fluid].

I alway change my pads when roughly half worn [3-4mm] instead of waiting till the factory safe minimum [1-2 mm].........pads are cheap ------an accident is not.


Most brake fade is fluid boiling vs pad fade.

The worst case for fluid temperature is 5-9 minutes after a serious stop sitting still! Heat soak from no air flow building up on caliper piston!
Old 09-25-2004, 05:30 AM
  #4  
westpak
SFZCC
iTrader: (19)
 
westpak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The only reason to resurface is if you actually feel a difference in braking like pulsating, and that is usually due to uneven pad material on the rotors not warping. If you go to the track and bed ther pads in properly you probably don't get uneven material as the track pads are harder and remove the pad material.

In my opinion resurfacing rotors is a waste of money and just a way to charge you more and sell you rotors sooner.

That being said if yo ugo to the track often you should keep an eye on the rotors not so much for resurfacing but because of thickness, if they get too thin they will not handle heat as well, so after 5 track events I would think you are probably ready for some new rotors.
Old 09-25-2004, 02:26 PM
  #5  
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Q45tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of course you don't just cut the rotors unless you have the symptoms and measure the rotor runout with a dial indicator.

Different vehicles have different rotor quality and brake design.....many times rotor warping is caused by wheel hubs bending a 0.0003" which get multipled out to rotor edges. Why they invented on the car brake lathes which should be used with Nissan performance models.

Many non precision brake shops may make the problems worse with off car external brake lathes.

I measure my own runout and decide how and who is going to do what mostly I spend an afternoon fixing my own situations, since most won't take the care I demand.

I usually get 40-50k out of my rotors which is long enough.

Fixed 4-6 piston usually provide more even pressure than more warped prone floating caliuper systems but fixed have more rigorous requirements to not feel runout.
Old 09-29-2004, 11:03 PM
  #6  
D'oh
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
D'oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the responses guys. Sounds like it really does come down to personal preference as long as you still have good rotor mass. I figure I'll keep running my rotors until I expose the fins

-D'oh!
Old 09-30-2004, 08:05 AM
  #7  
spf4000
New Member
 
spf4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SF, freezing my @ss off
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you track your car, you really don't want to be grinding your rotors--the only thing you will do is weaken the rotors, which will lead to warping and/or cracking.

Also, if you track your car heavily, you'll need to replace your rotors every few pad changes. This is especially necessary if you use race pads.
Old 09-30-2004, 08:12 AM
  #8  
Jason@Performance
Sponsor
Performance Nissan
iTrader: (11)
 
Jason@Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So-Cal - Ready to go?
Posts: 8,783
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

it all depends on how much thickness is left onyour rotors... Most OEM rotors when it is time to replace the pads can not be turned because they will be thinner then spec calls for...

The pads are not going to make full contact with the rotor if there is any rotor wear that is un even. this will cause noise, uneven braking, and will also decrease the life of your new pads and your already worn rotors...

would you put used pads on your new rotors? and cut into your new rotors so they are un-even from day one?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sherm
Engine & Drivetrain
15
04-11-2020 05:21 PM
Dark Knight
Wheels Tires
7
11-11-2015 08:40 PM
hajwoj
Autocross/Road
27
11-01-2015 05:25 PM
Stevo Z
SoCal Marketplace
4
10-03-2015 09:14 PM
samansharif
Brakes & Suspension
1
09-25-2015 12:31 PM



Quick Reply: Turning Rotors - Necessary or Needless?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:07 AM.