Notices
Drag NHRA, IDRC, IHRA, NDRA

bone stock 300C SRT8 runs 12.5@111.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 01:51 PM
  #1  
1QUICK1's Avatar
1QUICK1
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: nowheresville
Default bone stock 300C SRT8 runs 12.5@111.5

Perfect conditions, great DA, near sea level. The flying brick!

And before anyone calls BS, I know this guy, he's got a couple of fast cars and is one hell of a driver.



http://www.300cforums.com/forums/srt...one-stock.html
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #2  
EM-EFER's Avatar
EM-EFER
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: King of Materbation
Default

HAHA I think iam all set running against one of them .. ill save my gas
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #3  
05-Z's Avatar
05-Z
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 1
From: Ashburn VA
Default

That's fast....great car for the money.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 03:04 PM
  #4  
max2000jp's Avatar
max2000jp
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Great engine and transmission. Too bad it's UGLY!
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 03:28 PM
  #5  
1QUICK1's Avatar
1QUICK1
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: nowheresville
Default

Yeah, personally I hate their looks. another case of a great motoer in search of a good looking car. The sRT8 Charger and Magnum are no better in the looks dept. IMO.

They need a 3700 pound decent looking 2 door body for that motor.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #6  
max2000jp's Avatar
max2000jp
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by 1QUICK1
Yeah, personally I hate their looks. another case of a great motoer in search of a good looking car. The sRT8 Charger and Magnum are no better in the looks dept. IMO.

They need a 3700 pound decent looking 2 door body for that motor.
3700lbs is portly for a Coupe. A 3300-3500 2 Door coupe is what Chrysler needs. Oh yea a manual would help too.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #7  
atar350's Avatar
atar350
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
From: Sactown, California
Default

Jeeze....someone link to specs on SRT? That is one good driver, in some great conditions, awesome!
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #8  
1QUICK1's Avatar
1QUICK1
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: nowheresville
Default

Originally Posted by max2000jp
3700lbs is portly for a Coupe. A 3300-3500 2 Door coupe is what Chrysler needs. Oh yea a manual would help too.
I don't know, with new crash standards and such, 3300 I think is dreaming, and that motor drivetrain is heavy....possibly 3500ish, but heck, look at the GTO, that's 3750 and not a very big car.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #9  
1QUICK1's Avatar
1QUICK1
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: nowheresville
Default

Originally Posted by atar350
Jeeze....someone link to specs on SRT? That is one good driver, in some great conditions, awesome!
http://www-5.chrysler.com/vehsuite/dispatch.do
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #10  
1SLOWZ's Avatar
1SLOWZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: STL
Default

That is pretty impressive time for very heavy car, nice driving.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #11  
C5's are better's Avatar
C5's are better
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: race way park Hawaii
Default

Those cars out putting down 370 PLUS to the wheels in an automatic..

I think there probaly closer to 450 crank HP....

The 2005 GTO is only dynoing 335-345 to the wheels in the mn6..I think it's closer to 390 crank HP than the 400 they advertise....Since most are lucky to see 340 rwhp...

340 rwhp plus 15% (rw drive mn6 standard)= 391 crank HP

Doing the math the same way for the SRT goes like this...

370 rwhp plus 20% (rw drive a4 standard) = 444 crank HP!!!!!

They are just plain sick....

A recent comparo in road and Track had the 2005 GTO running 13.7 at 103 and the SRT8 running 13.3 at 108 mph....

These were uncorrected numbers...


BTW...Chrysler already has a 3400 pound two door car with 450 HP...

It's called the 2002 Dodge Viper.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #12  
1QUICK1's Avatar
1QUICK1
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: nowheresville
Default

Originally Posted by C5's are better

A recent comparo in road and Track had the 2005 GTO running 13.7 at 103 and the SRT8 running 13.3 at 108 mph
Sure you got the GTO numbers right?
MT ran the SRT8 300C 2005 GTO & CTSV:


CTSV 13.1 @ 109.8

SRT8 13.2 @ 108.1

GTO 13.3 @ 107.5

The GTO does fine againt the SRT8 considering it's about $7k cheaper.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 05:40 AM
  #13  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Thats just sick. high 1.8 60ft's just coming off idle...it outraps my best 1/8 speed by 2mph, but by the 1/4 its 4mph ahead, damn that thing pulls hard for being such a brick.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 05:54 AM
  #14  
DomZ's Avatar
DomZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

No no, I know that guy, its true. He has a 10.lowxx turbo 04 GTO and a Vette from what I understand...
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 12:18 PM
  #15  
C5's are better's Avatar
C5's are better
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: race way park Hawaii
Default

yES..iM 100% SURE....I also read the review your referring to...

But this was a raod and track review wich did not correct for weather or elevation
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #16  
1SLOWZ's Avatar
1SLOWZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: STL
Default

There are number of bone stock 05 GTOs gone into high 12s, trapping 108 - 110 mph. Go check out LS1GTO.com.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 12:59 PM
  #17  
1QUICK1's Avatar
1QUICK1
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: nowheresville
Default

Originally Posted by C5's are better
yES..iM 100% SURE....I also read the review your referring to...

But this was a raod and track review wich did not correct for weather or elevation
Which means nothing becase then all the cars in the MT test would have been corrected. Fact is you're quoting times for either a very hot day for the GTO where the ATIS data causes timing to be pulled or the GTO was driven like crap, under reasonable conditions a 2005 GTO is easily a low 13 car at 106+
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 08:29 AM
  #18  
95snoozer's Avatar
95snoozer
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
From: Austin/SA
Default

Originally Posted by 1QUICK1
Yeah, personally I hate their looks. another case of a great motoer in search of a good looking car. The sRT8 Charger and Magnum are no better in the looks dept. IMO.

They need a 3700 pound decent looking 2 door body for that motor.
they have one in the works

challenger
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2005 | 12:57 PM
  #19  
LSRoadster's Avatar
LSRoadster
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Kenosha, Wi
Default

Both the SRT-8's and the GTO's are beasts, I looked at the GTO before I bought the Z, I just really wanted a convertable, and I dont regret my purchase. Now if I had 45K to spend on a car, it would be the SRT-8 all the way.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #20  
silverTA 2002's Avatar
silverTA 2002
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Default

What tires was he running on?

Was he completely full weight (spare tire and all)?

Were the A/C and alternator pulleys on?

Did he ice the intake?

Were the airfilter and airbox still attached?

There are more than a few ways to "cheat" a bone stock car. I'm just curious as to how he's that much faster than the other guys out there. Sweet times either way.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:49 AM.