NEW PB: 11.53@121mph
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 1
From: West suburbs of Chi-town
Originally Posted by 1fish
WOW 3.1 seconds, thats enzo territory!! simply amazing, And i do agree with your desire not to change the car permantly for dragin it would ruin a perfectly good car , but still air bags are made just for that reason, and dont affect the cars performance in anyway when there deflated, , your wise to be cautious on the psi side personaly 15 is about as far as i will drop my tires, I worry too much about spinning the tire off the rim and having a serious accident at top end. I still think you should consider a drive shaft loop I hate to hear about you pogo-ing at 120+
Good luck and good racing, Matt.
Good luck and good racing, Matt.
Originally Posted by BriGuyMax
Oh and the whole 0-60 thing, if you calculate my 0-60 based on my 1/4 mile pass, it's around 3.1 seconds. Not too shabby with a shift involved.
Originally Posted by BriGuyMax
The driveshaft is carbon fiber, so it would shatter if it did break. it does basically have a driveshaft loop. The stock sub frame connector halfway between the trans and the rear diff loops under the driveshaft so if it did break that coupled with the exhaust right under it would make it very tough for the driveshaft to go anywhere.
Yea i took a look under there and it seems like the subframe connector would keep if from falling forward, its not the drive shaft the loop is ment to protect its the universal joints if the front one goes on an unprotected car and the shaft falls and catches on the track the car is launched , kind of like a pogo stick, hence the term pogo-ing.
That is a really awesome time Briguy! Your car is quite the "sleeper" I must say, and is very clean. It seems as though you would like to become one of the premier drivers here on my350z. As is you werent already up there as it is. Good stuff, and good luck with your new setup whatever it is you decide.
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 1
From: West suburbs of Chi-town
Originally Posted by diwun67
3.1 is awesome, but how did you calculate that?
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php
one of the many on the internet...accurate to within +/- two tenths
I just plugged my new numbers into that and it spit out 2.9 seconds
So on the worst side of things my car goes 3.1-3.2 0-60...still pretty decent.
Originally Posted by BriGuyMax
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php
one of the many on the internet...accurate to within +/- two tenths
I just plugged my new numbers into that and it spit out 2.9 seconds
So on the worst side of things my car goes 3.1-3.2 0-60...still pretty decent.
one of the many on the internet...accurate to within +/- two tenths
I just plugged my new numbers into that and it spit out 2.9 seconds
So on the worst side of things my car goes 3.1-3.2 0-60...still pretty decent.
Originally Posted by BriGuyMax
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php
one of the many on the internet...accurate to within +/- two tenths
I just plugged my new numbers into that and it spit out 2.9 seconds
So on the worst side of things my car goes 3.1-3.2 0-60...still pretty decent.
one of the many on the internet...accurate to within +/- two tenths
I just plugged my new numbers into that and it spit out 2.9 seconds
So on the worst side of things my car goes 3.1-3.2 0-60...still pretty decent.
Originally Posted by BriGuyMax
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php
one of the many on the internet...accurate to within +/- two tenths
I just plugged my new numbers into that and it spit out 2.9 seconds
So on the worst side of things my car goes 3.1-3.2 0-60...still pretty decent.
one of the many on the internet...accurate to within +/- two tenths
I just plugged my new numbers into that and it spit out 2.9 seconds
So on the worst side of things my car goes 3.1-3.2 0-60...still pretty decent.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






