Motortrend ran a 13.77 on the track model in their new issue (from the pervious 13.97). So I suppose thats the best that can be done in stock form?

 

Somebody can always eek out another .1 somewhere, I wouldnt call it the fastest possible stock. I ran 13.77 @ 101.4 back in April, when I got my car.

 

I have that copy. Our Zs are pretty quick for a 3.5 V6. 0-100 was 13sec just like the LS1 Camaro! It spanked the S2 and RX8

 

See sig.

The reason why there are some mid/low/14's high 13's runs is, because of different track location, different driver skill, weather, and different 350Z power levels (as we know the Z can dyno anywhere from 225whp-249whp).

 

I think its funny how everyone here doubted our members who were running 13.7-13.8 stock. Yet when a magazine did it you're all of a sudden believers. :P

 

Yes, it is true that random internet freaks are just as trustworthy as major publications......

I'm just glad that the numbers were confirmed by yet another source so that there is less of the "I call BS" whenever someone posts a good time.

Also, it just goes to show how variable these times can be.

-D'oh!

 

Sad but true....

 

Very sad that no one believed me, my first run day i went out with my car to the track i ran a 14.2 very first run....By the end of the day my best was 13.899 @99.2 w/ 2.059 60ft, now thats 5AT, But i took out the spare......No one would believe me, but hey i know what my car does......

 

i believe you ...meanwhile..i gotta check out your car when you get it all done..mine should be outa the shop in a couple of weeks

 

you're not talking about me are you? i was always a believer

 

i heard the 6spd LS1s hit lower 13s while the 5ats do high 13s. I was about to race against my friends SS the other day but his mom crashed it .

 

LS1 Camaros are 12 second 0-100 cars just FYI....
mine took 12.9 to hit 110

But on topic i was quite impressed with the Zs performance. Blew the other 2 away

 

No, not directed towards you at all. Just a general statement from responses I've seen here

 

Just post your time slips and no one well question you guys?

 

How are these at the track? I'd like to lap with someone if I ever get the chance. I haven't had my S2000 for long and it was a tough decision between the 2.

However I did manage to hang with one at the track in my RSX-S last summer. I had quite a bit of suspension mods, and it IS very driver dependant.

If only I could have both

 

I'm talking about stock form.

 

Here this guy Jamrws6 comes again with his LS1 babble. A good runnin stock SS could trap around 105-108 on a good day with traction. There 0-100mph would range around high 12s, mid 13s. Since their truck engines were made with such low quality their hp ratings were not accurate, therefore evey dude with a LS1 powered car thinks he has a fac. freak hittin 12s at the track and pumpin out 320 to the wheels lol. Cmon old news go somewhere else with that bs man.

 

Uh dude, you're math is poor.

If you're trapping 105-108mph for a low 13 second 1/4, how would your 0-100 be mid 13's?

 

who said every SS is runnin low 13s? and ive seen more 105 or below traps than ever a 108, so a high 13 1/4 run with 105 trap, could equal a high 12s or low 13s run 0-100. Im talkin about the normal runnin SS's or other LS1 powered cars, the ones that show up on the legitmate magazines, or at the track. Your telling me that every LS1 powered car runs 0-100 in 12s flat, and picks up 10mph more in just .9 seconds?? lol

 

just for you info. im talkin about all STOCK runnin LS1 powered cars.