Doug @ Crawford's vs 2002 E46 M3 6SP
Originally posted by VandyZ
Well you do have some legit concerns. The fact is Doug wants to hit 300 as well. The heads are way over worked on the exhaust side which is causing problems on the intake side. Doug is working on it.
I don’t know if Mike (mjedens) would want me to say this but I don’t think he cares . . .He and Doug dynoed on the same day at the same dyno a couple weeks back (a shoot out if you will) and Doug's numbers were better!
Well you do have some legit concerns. The fact is Doug wants to hit 300 as well. The heads are way over worked on the exhaust side which is causing problems on the intake side. Doug is working on it.
I don’t know if Mike (mjedens) would want me to say this but I don’t think he cares . . .He and Doug dynoed on the same day at the same dyno a couple weeks back (a shoot out if you will) and Doug's numbers were better!
Originally posted by jreiter
Interesting post, Zon. Is that "bubble" procedure required to obtain CARB certification? I have heard that getting CARB certified is a real pain, but I've never heard about the testing required.
Interesting post, Zon. Is that "bubble" procedure required to obtain CARB certification? I have heard that getting CARB certified is a real pain, but I've never heard about the testing required.
Good work guys. Man that VQ is a jewel of an engine. As far as E46 engine mods, we have pretty much the same stuff headers,intake, exhaust, cams & Software. (All overpriced) The guys that are making the most power tend to increase the redline a bit to about 8500rpm or so. I think the max I have seen on an N/A dyno was about 330-340 rwhp.
Originally posted by throbbing_Zon
That's a good question, jreiter. But I am only familiar with the EPA cert aspect.
That's a good question, jreiter. But I am only familiar with the EPA cert aspect.
Originally posted by metalz
So what are the total costs of such a monster. It is the real deal for this w natural aspiration.
So what are the total costs of such a monster. It is the real deal for this w natural aspiration.
You can assume the Crawford package, then add in heads/cams...
Once we hit our target of 300, we'll start talking price.
As with ANY product we offer, if it doesn't hit our expectations... it doesn't get sold.
I was just curious to see the amount of money that something like this would cost. I personally prefer a natually aspirated car to the turbo version. I think the best example of this is the porsche gt3 v. the porsche turbo. The turbo is a hair faster stock and can be modded a lot more, but the raw feel of the gt3 is what it is all about.
Originally posted by ins
Do you think that this setup is going to cost less then force induction?.. ie:4-6 grand with instillation MAYBE 6.5 totall?
Do you think that this setup is going to cost less then force induction?.. ie:4-6 grand with instillation MAYBE 6.5 totall?
So yes, I can say a complete NA kit would be less than that.
Originally posted by PhoenixINX
Well, considering to do an FI engine RIGHT... internals, management, kit, etc... you have to plan on spending $10k+ at MINIMUM.
So yes, I can say a complete NA kit would be less than that.
Well, considering to do an FI engine RIGHT... internals, management, kit, etc... you have to plan on spending $10k+ at MINIMUM.
So yes, I can say a complete NA kit would be less than that.
We're talking ~300rwhp here, not 400+ rwhp plus like with a good vortec tune so back WAY DOWN off that $10K number or you'll lose interest real quick IMO. Remember your competition. This is only ~70 more rwhp than stock.
After thought...
...and out of that ~70rwhp, the first 40 hp comes from the Crawford headers, plenum and cats which only run $2100. How much more should we expect to pay for the other 20 or 30rwhp?
...and out of that ~70rwhp, the first 40 hp comes from the Crawford headers, plenum and cats which only run $2100. How much more should we expect to pay for the other 20 or 30rwhp?
The last bit have proved to be the hardest to get.
Just looking at the dyno graph again, really puts things into perspective. The power shoots up and stays. Its not "peaky" at all. Between looking at the graph and driving the car, it really is impressive. I am eager to see where we go from here.
Just looking at the dyno graph again, really puts things into perspective. The power shoots up and stays. Its not "peaky" at all. Between looking at the graph and driving the car, it really is impressive. I am eager to see where we go from here.
Originally posted by VandyZ
The last bit have proved to be the hardest to get.
Just looking at the dyno graph again, really puts things into perspective. The power shoots up and stays. Its not "peaky" at all. Between looking at the graph and driving the car, it really is impressive. I am eager to see where we go from here.
The last bit have proved to be the hardest to get.
Just looking at the dyno graph again, really puts things into perspective. The power shoots up and stays. Its not "peaky" at all. Between looking at the graph and driving the car, it really is impressive. I am eager to see where we go from here.
Nice numbers for NA !
Now if Nissan would have made the car perform like this stock =)
I still think the car should be FI for the best bang for the buck. If you FI a Z you wont ever need to worry about M3's.
I just got my Dyno done on my M3 at 281 RWHP VS my Modded Z that put down 231 RWHP on the same Dyno last year. I had about $2,500 in NA mods on my Z "Crawford / Exhaust / Cats etc..". I currently have $550 in mods on my M3 "ECU / Intake".
Now if Nissan would have made the car perform like this stock =)
I still think the car should be FI for the best bang for the buck. If you FI a Z you wont ever need to worry about M3's.
I just got my Dyno done on my M3 at 281 RWHP VS my Modded Z that put down 231 RWHP on the same Dyno last year. I had about $2,500 in NA mods on my Z "Crawford / Exhaust / Cats etc..". I currently have $550 in mods on my M3 "ECU / Intake".
Originally posted by lotus
Nice numbers for NA !
Now if Nissan would have made the car perform like this stock =)
I still think the car should be FI for the best bang for the buck. If you FI a Z you wont ever need to worry about M3's.
I just got my Dyno done on my M3 at 281 RWHP VS my Modded Z that put down 231 RWHP on the same Dyno last year. I had about $2,500 in NA mods on my Z "Crawford / Exhaust / Cats etc..". I currently have $550 in mods on my M3 "ECU / Intake".
Nice numbers for NA !
Now if Nissan would have made the car perform like this stock =)
I still think the car should be FI for the best bang for the buck. If you FI a Z you wont ever need to worry about M3's.
I just got my Dyno done on my M3 at 281 RWHP VS my Modded Z that put down 231 RWHP on the same Dyno last year. I had about $2,500 in NA mods on my Z "Crawford / Exhaust / Cats etc..". I currently have $550 in mods on my M3 "ECU / Intake".
Originally posted by Alberto
Nice numbers and powerband on the Crawford car, but I am a little dissapointed in the peak hp numbers, Ive seen a guy hit 280 rwhp 270 ft lbs with JWT cams, and no head work.
Nice numbers and powerband on the Crawford car, but I am a little dissapointed in the peak hp numbers, Ive seen a guy hit 280 rwhp 270 ft lbs with JWT cams, and no head work.
Originally posted by SR20DEN
Lets all be honest to ourselves here and ask the question do we want a dyno queen car or do we want a car that wins at the racetrack?
Lets all be honest to ourselves here and ask the question do we want a dyno queen car or do we want a car that wins at the racetrack?
A car that has more area under the curve (i.e. a bigger, flatter torque curve) will be more fun on the street, too. I think that's where most Z owners spend most of their time anyway.
Well, so far the issues are all tuning with both the high radical (Dougs) and mid radical (mine) cams. We hope to solve this shortly using motec to get a idea on what exactly needs to be done. Until then we are swapping ecu's back and forth to TechnoSquare waiting for the perfect tune to come back.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





