Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Doug @ Crawford's vs 2002 E46 M3 6SP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 04:08 AM
  #41  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally posted by VandyZ
Well you do have some legit concerns. The fact is Doug wants to hit 300 as well. The heads are way over worked on the exhaust side which is causing problems on the intake side. Doug is working on it.

I don’t know if Mike (mjedens) would want me to say this but I don’t think he cares . . .He and Doug dynoed on the same day at the same dyno a couple weeks back (a shoot out if you will) and Doug's numbers were better!

I understand, I was just stating my concern, because I believe there is more power to be had with all these mods, Im sure you Crawford guys will figure it out in the end. Figure out the intake side of the heads, and repost some numbers, until then good luck tuning it.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 07:53 AM
  #42  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

Originally posted by jreiter
Interesting post, Zon. Is that "bubble" procedure required to obtain CARB certification? I have heard that getting CARB certified is a real pain, but I've never heard about the testing required.
That's a good question, jreiter. But I am only familiar with the EPA cert aspect.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 10:43 AM
  #43  
12gage's Avatar
12gage
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Good work guys. Man that VQ is a jewel of an engine. As far as E46 engine mods, we have pretty much the same stuff headers,intake, exhaust, cams & Software. (All overpriced) The guys that are making the most power tend to increase the redline a bit to about 8500rpm or so. I think the max I have seen on an N/A dyno was about 330-340 rwhp.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 12:10 PM
  #44  
jreiter's Avatar
jreiter
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
From: san luis obispo, ca
Default

Originally posted by throbbing_Zon
That's a good question, jreiter. But I am only familiar with the EPA cert aspect.
One thing I'm really interested to see is if this new Crawford package includes cats. If it does, I can't imagine how they'd get CARB certified. Passing a new set of cats surely must be near impossible. I guess they could CARB certify the whole package *without* the cats, but then people could just do the cats separately with the knowledge it is no longer certified.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 01:39 AM
  #45  
metalz's Avatar
metalz
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: coral gables
Default

So what are the total costs of such a monster. It is the real deal for this w natural aspiration.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 07:00 AM
  #46  
PhoenixINX's Avatar
PhoenixINX
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally posted by metalz
So what are the total costs of such a monster. It is the real deal for this w natural aspiration.
Costs have not even been estimated yet.

You can assume the Crawford package, then add in heads/cams...

Once we hit our target of 300, we'll start talking price.

As with ANY product we offer, if it doesn't hit our expectations... it doesn't get sold.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 11:59 AM
  #47  
metalz's Avatar
metalz
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: coral gables
Default

I was just curious to see the amount of money that something like this would cost. I personally prefer a natually aspirated car to the turbo version. I think the best example of this is the porsche gt3 v. the porsche turbo. The turbo is a hair faster stock and can be modded a lot more, but the raw feel of the gt3 is what it is all about.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #48  
ins's Avatar
ins
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Do you think that this setup is going to cost less then force induction?.. ie:4-6 grand with instillation MAYBE 6.5 totall?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 10:02 PM
  #49  
PhoenixINX's Avatar
PhoenixINX
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally posted by ins
Do you think that this setup is going to cost less then force induction?.. ie:4-6 grand with instillation MAYBE 6.5 totall?
Well, considering to do an FI engine RIGHT... internals, management, kit, etc... you have to plan on spending $10k+ at MINIMUM.

So yes, I can say a complete NA kit would be less than that.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 06:18 AM
  #50  
neffster's Avatar
neffster
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: Oviedo, FL
Default

Originally posted by PhoenixINX
Well, considering to do an FI engine RIGHT... internals, management, kit, etc... you have to plan on spending $10k+ at MINIMUM.

So yes, I can say a complete NA kit would be less than that.
No no no! You're in the stillen S/C stage 1 horsepower range here. A fair comparison is a $3800 plus install and a $650 hood. That's in the $5500 price range and you'd even get a warranty and carb certification to boot.

We're talking ~300rwhp here, not 400+ rwhp plus like with a good vortec tune so back WAY DOWN off that $10K number or you'll lose interest real quick IMO. Remember your competition. This is only ~70 more rwhp than stock.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 08:38 AM
  #51  
neffster's Avatar
neffster
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: Oviedo, FL
Default

After thought...

...and out of that ~70rwhp, the first 40 hp comes from the Crawford headers, plenum and cats which only run $2100. How much more should we expect to pay for the other 20 or 30rwhp?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #52  
VandyZ's Avatar
VandyZ
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

The last bit have proved to be the hardest to get.

Just looking at the dyno graph again, really puts things into perspective. The power shoots up and stays. Its not "peaky" at all. Between looking at the graph and driving the car, it really is impressive. I am eager to see where we go from here.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 09:47 AM
  #53  
mojo powered's Avatar
mojo powered
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Allentown, PA
Default

Originally posted by VandyZ
The last bit have proved to be the hardest to get.

Just looking at the dyno graph again, really puts things into perspective. The power shoots up and stays. Its not "peaky" at all. Between looking at the graph and driving the car, it really is impressive. I am eager to see where we go from here.
Very very interesting... that sounds like a very good road race/autocross setup with plenty of useable torque. I'm very interested to see where you guys go from here. Best of luck
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 04:14 AM
  #54  
sponsorsthisway's Avatar
sponsorsthisway
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Macungie, PA
Default

Is this something that will work with a TT setup?
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 05:27 PM
  #55  
lotus's Avatar
lotus
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: arizona
Default

Nice numbers for NA !

Now if Nissan would have made the car perform like this stock =)

I still think the car should be FI for the best bang for the buck. If you FI a Z you wont ever need to worry about M3's.

I just got my Dyno done on my M3 at 281 RWHP VS my Modded Z that put down 231 RWHP on the same Dyno last year. I had about $2,500 in NA mods on my Z "Crawford / Exhaust / Cats etc..". I currently have $550 in mods on my M3 "ECU / Intake".
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #56  
Z BOY's Avatar
Z BOY
Registered User
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,264
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

Originally posted by lotus
Nice numbers for NA !

Now if Nissan would have made the car perform like this stock =)

I still think the car should be FI for the best bang for the buck. If you FI a Z you wont ever need to worry about M3's.

I just got my Dyno done on my M3 at 281 RWHP VS my Modded Z that put down 231 RWHP on the same Dyno last year. I had about $2,500 in NA mods on my Z "Crawford / Exhaust / Cats etc..". I currently have $550 in mods on my M3 "ECU / Intake".
fzuk...that so pizzes me off!
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #57  
SR20DEN's Avatar
SR20DEN
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally posted by Alberto
Nice numbers and powerband on the Crawford car, but I am a little dissapointed in the peak hp numbers, Ive seen a guy hit 280 rwhp 270 ft lbs with JWT cams, and no head work.
You shouldn't be looking at only peak numbers. Overlay these other dyno charts you speak of and you'll notice that this car has more area under the curve and I would bet money that this car will go down the track faster than the other cars that are making more 'peak' power. Lets all be honest to ourselves here and ask the question do we want a dyno queen car or do we want a car that wins at the racetrack?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 01:59 AM
  #58  
jreiter's Avatar
jreiter
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
From: san luis obispo, ca
Default

Originally posted by SR20DEN
Lets all be honest to ourselves here and ask the question do we want a dyno queen car or do we want a car that wins at the racetrack?
It's not just the racetrack. A car that has more area under the curve (i.e. a bigger, flatter torque curve) will be more fun on the street, too. I think that's where most Z owners spend most of their time anyway.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 11:18 AM
  #59  
Diesel350's Avatar
Diesel350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

So what ever happened with the cam package?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #60  
VandyZ's Avatar
VandyZ
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Well, so far the issues are all tuning with both the high radical (Dougs) and mid radical (mine) cams. We hope to solve this shortly using motec to get a idea on what exactly needs to be done. Until then we are swapping ecu's back and forth to TechnoSquare waiting for the perfect tune to come back.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
teggy
Media Share
13
Aug 8, 2008 10:14 AM
04DGG35
G35/G37
43
Jul 22, 2005 09:27 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 AM.