Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Found a cure for the understeer in my Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2002 | 02:48 PM
  #1  
moab355's Avatar
moab355
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default Found a cure for the understeer in my Z

For the advanced drivers out there only. I found after lots of testing that you can in fact rid the 350Z of understeer. I removed my front sway bar. And it is great. The understeer is gone and there are no ill handling effects as a result. I have picked up massive grip on the front end. Just thought you guys would like to know.
Old 12-30-2002 | 03:11 PM
  #2  
Flyingscot's Avatar
Flyingscot
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I spotted the HUGE front bar while watching Eric install the grounding kit. As big as it is, I knew it had to go. However, I'm all in favor of replacing it with a smaller adjustable bar.

Did you notice any significant increase in body roll?

Fly

Can you give a more detailed account of the change in handling?
Old 12-30-2002 | 03:27 PM
  #3  
moab355's Avatar
moab355
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

Body roll differences were negligible. I noticed almost no change in the amount of body roll. turn in was better and overall grip is improved. That being said it is only noticeably better with the traction control off and really driving it hard. The car is much more neutral in slow speed corners. I actually had my dealer take it off for me. They were happy to do it and did not charge me. There is nothing better than a mod friendly dealer.
Old 12-30-2002 | 03:37 PM
  #4  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

if its so bad, why is it there, and why do people sell aftermarket bars? also it is ajdustable if that helps any.

so can anyone explain what the benifits are if not better traction?
Old 12-30-2002 | 03:50 PM
  #5  
MannishBoy's Avatar
MannishBoy
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Default

Most factory tuning has some understeer, because it is easier to control and recover from than oversteer. In other words, the assumption is that it is less likely to get them sued.
Old 12-30-2002 | 07:53 PM
  #6  
dwnshift's Avatar
dwnshift
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati
Default

That is a crutch and not a fix. What you did was gain more neg camber in the front end by letting the front roll over more.
The correct way is to decrease the front and rear roll y going tobigger front and rear bars in a eqaul %. In the end you are going the wrong way by removing the front bar.......
We made huge gains on the track by increasing the bars front and rear in stiffness.
Old 12-30-2002 | 08:00 PM
  #7  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

ya know Im starting to get tired of all your damn posts giving little bits of info and teasing us. WE WANT DETAILS!!!!!!
Old 12-30-2002 | 08:03 PM
  #8  
dwnshift's Avatar
dwnshift
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati
Default

patitents grasshopper! All in time.......I cannot just come out and say things...just hints here and there. Dont worry I am on your guys side.
Old 12-31-2002 | 09:41 AM
  #9  
SunsetZ's Avatar
SunsetZ
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Default

Would adjusting our front strut tower brace remove some understeer? Has anyone played with those adjustments yet?
Old 12-31-2002 | 11:14 AM
  #10  
dwnshift's Avatar
dwnshift
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati
Default

no
Old 12-31-2002 | 11:39 AM
  #11  
franklinz's Avatar
franklinz
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: copperas cove texas
Default

Originally posted by dwnshift
That is a crutch and not a fix. What you did was gain more neg camber in the front end by letting the front roll over more.
The correct way is to decrease the front and rear roll y going tobigger front and rear bars in a eqaul %. In the end you are going the wrong way by removing the front bar.......
We made huge gains on the track by increasing the bars front and rear in stiffness.
well said dwnshift! in the earlier z's youd have to slot your holes where the bolts go through the towers, and install a camber plate on the top to set your + or - camber. pretty easy stuff i must say. hopefully the 350z is pretty much the same way; straight forward..
franklinz
Old 01-01-2003 | 05:42 PM
  #12  
Maximam's Avatar
Maximam
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Stiffer rear bar!!!
Old 01-02-2003 | 12:12 AM
  #13  
D'oh's Avatar
D'oh
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 1
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default

dwnshft,

Why do you say that removing the front anti-roll bar is a crutch? If it actually helps make the car more balanced, and increases the overall grip, it sounds pretty legitimate to me. The only negative I see is that you may increase body roll, but since the Z is already so flat then is that really a problem.

It seems that if you call that fix a crutch, then isn't any other change also a crutch? I understand that you can do even better by stiffening the front and rear, but as far as bang for the buck, removing parts is much less expensive than adding new ones. Also, if someone then decided the performance with the bar removed was not good enough, they could always get a stiffer one later.

-D'oh!
Old 01-02-2003 | 09:36 AM
  #14  
digerydingo's Avatar
digerydingo
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

Once again don't confuse feel for actual performance. I'm sure it does kill understeer but have you actually taken it on the skid pad and got a higher rating, you may also not have been pushing as hard knowing of the cars inherent understeer from the factory, however, now push even harder after modifications which may be eluding to further performance gains where there are none.

One definite disadvantage to removing the front sway bar is chassis stiffness. I'm sure Nissan engineers tested the car with and without the front roll bar but in the end the understeer (and yes I know Nissan does build in plenty of understeer on top of that) was a small price to pay for the added performance and chassis strength. You see, in slow speed corners the unequal length wishbones and roll of the car help camber the wheels alowing you to keep maximum contact patch with the road, however in high speed corners loosing the stiffness and stability of alowing the left and right sides to help eachother realy affects your contact patch, not to mention tire wear as now in both slow and high speed corners the outside wheel with be doing twice the work. Add bumps, curbing, cracks or anything that can change the plane of suspension and I'm sure you feel the wonderfull slip/grip, slip/grip on the front as each of the front suspension wiggles around on it's own, scrubbing more rubber and ultimately more grip.
Old 01-02-2003 | 04:25 PM
  #15  
moab355's Avatar
moab355
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

To answer you question Yes I have pushed the car to the limits. I have done so over the same corners I drive everyday. I have gained 10-15% speed per corner. I have not gone to a skid pad I do not need to. With front Sway bar on I can take a very tight corner I drive often at 26 MPH without it I can get 32 MPH out of the same corner with more control. I have driven it and driven both ways and until someone comes out with better sway bars mine is staying off. and as far as the highspeed stuff I have taken some 35MPH corners on the freway at 120+ and the car has shown no ill handling because of the lacking Sway bar.
Old 01-02-2003 | 04:42 PM
  #16  
raceboy's Avatar
raceboy
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
From: Smackahoe Blvd
Default

35mph corner at 120+?? At least I now know there is internet access in the afterlife!! LOL I know that corner speed signs are underrated, but come on!!
Old 01-02-2003 | 05:12 PM
  #17  
Rock's Avatar
Rock
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

120+ in a 35MPH corner?
Is it even possible in a F1 car?
Doubt it.....
Old 01-02-2003 | 06:01 PM
  #18  
moab355's Avatar
moab355
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

Hello,

It is possible and well within the limits of your Z. This car is very predictable and corners with some of the best cars in the world. Yes there are several fast, Banked sweepers in SLC Utah rated at 35MPH (posted speed limit sign) that can be taken at 120 Plus in the Z. If anyone would like to fly to SLC and verify I would be happy to oblidge. An F1 car could take the same corners at 170 plus.
Old 01-02-2003 | 06:13 PM
  #19  
moab355's Avatar
moab355
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

Hello,

And before I get roasted let me add this. I am not saying that all 35 MPH corners can be taken that fast. I saying there are a few corners on our freeway that are 3 lanes wide with excellent visability(an absolute must) that you can take at about 120 MPH dependent on outside temp. The are other 35 MPH corners I can only 85-90 MPH on. Those of you that race know what I am talking about the rest of you will just have to trust that I do not have my speedo in Kilometers per hour. This is a great car I hope everyone is enjoying theirs as much as I am.......
Old 01-03-2003 | 12:31 PM
  #20  
Boomer's Avatar
Boomer
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by dwnshift
no
Would changing the stock tires from 225/50/17s to 245/45/17s and, the 235/50/17s to 255/45/17s increase the negative/positive camber? If so, which, negative or positive?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 AM.