Scott Performance custom grind cams or Nismo Cams. please help CANT DECIDE!!!!
02-02-2006, 07:54 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Bruno
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scott Performance custom grind cams or Nismo Cams. please help CANT DECIDE!!!!
i would just like to know the specifications of both of these cams. if anyone has these cams on their car please feel free to comment. i really can't seem to decide between the two of these. any input is much appreciated. thanks! 
02-02-2006, 09:48 PM
#7
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Bruno
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if i go with the N/A cams, that means that i won't be able to use it if i ever decide to go f/i? does that mean i should just wait on the cams as of now? and was also wondering what the gains were if any of you know. thanks
Trending Topics
02-03-2006, 12:09 AM
#12
VERTEX Army CEO
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO...if you are even considering going F/I in the future, I'd wait until then since they'll have your engine pulled out anyway for the install. This will save you some money & as you know, cam installs are not cheap. But if you still want do it anyway, I'd definitely recommend getting a fuel/engine management system like unichip or even a TS reflash in order to fully utilize those cams.
02-03-2006, 04:23 AM
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 287HP
Nismo Cams:262 Duration with 10.2 mm of Lift
JWT S1 CAMS: 260 Duration with 10.9 mm of Lift
Scott Perf. Custom Grind: NA
JWT S1 CAMS: 260 Duration with 10.9 mm of Lift
Scott Perf. Custom Grind: NA
JWT S1 cams are .428" lift = 10.87mm
02-03-2006, 06:22 AM
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Bruno
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have the unichip, and it was tuned by ted. i definetely felt a difference when it was installed. but with cams, i'm pretty sure it'll turn into a screamer! lol
02-03-2006, 08:27 AM
#15
Registered User
Originally Posted by chichi506
i would just like to know the specifications of both of these cams. if anyone has these cams on their car please feel free to comment. i really can't seem to decide between the two of these. any input is much appreciated. thanks!
02-03-2006, 09:40 AM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by arizzee
Nismo R-Tune cams are .426" lift = 10.82mm
JWT S1 cams are .428" lift = 10.87mm
JWT S1 cams are .428" lift = 10.87mm
You will probably remember older posts where everyone thought the Nismos were 10.2 mm of lift, but no one seemed to calculate .426" to mm correctly. Thanks for the clarification. So it looks like the Nismos & JWTs are nearly identical. FWIW-The stock cam specs(non-rev-up) come in around 9.5 mm with 238 IN & 240 EX Duration, although I have heard of them being around 9.2 mm of lift
Last edited by 287HP; 02-03-2006 at 10:19 AM.
02-03-2006, 12:32 PM
#17
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: norcal
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
IMO...if you are even considering going F/I in the future, I'd wait until then since they'll have your engine pulled out anyway for the install. This will save you some money & as you know, cam installs are not cheap. But if you still want do it anyway, I'd definitely recommend getting a fuel/engine management system like unichip or even a TS reflash in order to fully utilize those cams.
All excellent points to consider.
02-03-2006, 12:35 PM
#18
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: norcal
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chichi506
i have the unichip, i definetely felt a difference when it was installed. but with cams, i'm pretty sure it'll turn into a screamer! lol
02-03-2006, 12:46 PM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZON
This is true, as I and I am sure 287HP can concure.
Zon,
You should ask ted what the specs are on those cams, I am real curious as to what they are.
Last edited by 287HP; 02-03-2006 at 12:49 PM.
02-03-2006, 02:36 PM
#20
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Bruno
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
he's quoting for the cams $1600 installed. but with an extra 800, bringing the total to 2400, i can have titanium valve springs and have my car be able to rev upto 8000 rpms no problem.