Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Turbo Kit for 350Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2003, 08:25 AM
  #41  
bluetouring350
Registered User
 
bluetouring350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: jacksonville, fl
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would go with the single turbo option, why pay the extra money for another turbo if you dont need it? A T-04 would be perfect for this engine, 10 psi is nowhere near the potential of the turbo. With the stock internals it will be hard to dial up much boost but come on guys 400 hp is a lot in a little car. If you dialed the T-04 to 30 psi you would have about 600+hp. Who needs a supra? All it will take is some low compression pistons and fuel systems.
Old 03-21-2003, 03:30 PM
  #42  
inG35coupe
Registered User
 
inG35coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by D'oh
Axis,

(but like I said, I will most likely go N/A or stay stock)

-D'oh!
NA is stock. NA Naturally Aspirated. I'm not being a smart@$$, I just corrected you.
Old 03-21-2003, 04:56 PM
  #43  
BurnOutz
Registered User
 
BurnOutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hercules
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by inG35coupe
NA is stock. NA Naturally Aspirated. I'm not being a smart@$$, I just corrected you.
I think what he meant was that he would either leave the car as is or, if he were to ever mod it, then he would rather stick with the N/A route rather than go FI.
Old 03-23-2003, 03:58 AM
  #44  
350zhawaii
Registered User
 
350zhawaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

option 2
Old 03-23-2003, 04:48 AM
  #45  
sschmuve
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
sschmuve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Option 1
Old 03-23-2003, 05:08 PM
  #46  
Strange
Registered User
 
Strange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Savannah Ga
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lag..what Lag. Are you kidding me, a small single putting out 400 hp on a 3.5L 6 will have almost no lag. I had a single turbo Supra with over 500RWHP and it spooled faster than the stock twins. Believe me, simple is better. Also a single= less weight and fewer things to go wrong.
Just my 2 cents.

PS
the real questions is: is 400 RWHP all the 350 can support with stock internals. Not flaming but just wondering how bullet proof the engine is??

Last edited by Strange; 03-23-2003 at 05:11 PM.
Old 03-23-2003, 05:24 PM
  #47  
Zyal8tr
Registered User
 
Zyal8tr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MS
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My question is when in the hell are we gonna stop talking about what its supposedly gonna do and someone actually sell a damn turbo kit. I wanna see some STATS!
Old 03-23-2003, 05:42 PM
  #48  
Ore417
Registered User
 
Ore417's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Bit off topic

Can the stock Automatic tranny hold up that much horses (400hp)? and a little bit off topic here.... James, how much was it to mod up that Q45, you know, the grand total?
Old 03-25-2003, 02:49 PM
  #49  
calc1
Registered User
 
calc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Option 1

Would put up with a little extra lag time for the cost savings. Even $5K makes me nervous.

cal
Old 03-25-2003, 03:10 PM
  #50  
Sudou
Registered User
 
Sudou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this thread should have been a poll
Old 03-25-2003, 06:20 PM
  #51  
TJZ
Registered User
 
TJZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Option 1
Old 03-27-2003, 08:09 PM
  #52  
hyperxmr2
Registered User
 
hyperxmr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: nowhere
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

any thoughts when designing the turbos to have it able to fit the g35 coupes? i mean if it would fit 2 cars you'll have a larger market. if your making a single kit, where are you going to place the turbo? wouldn't two small t3, or gt25/28 be eaiser to fit into the tight engine bay? and really 7000 isnt even much for a twin kit, keep in mind hks twin gt28 kit retails over 9k and thant does't even come with a i/c. 7000 is a decent price in my mind, considering you pretty much getting two small turbo kits. but hey what do i know.
Old 03-27-2003, 10:37 PM
  #53  
D'oh
Registered User
 
D'oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by inG35coupe
NA is stock. NA Naturally Aspirated. I'm not being a smart@$$, I just corrected you.
What BurnOutz said.

I could stay NA but add cams, headers, forged pistons, ECU remap, stroker kit, etc. and it would no longer be stock, but still would be NA (not that those parts exist yet, but you get the idea).

I guess it was a bit confusing given the nature of this post, however.

Now, back on topic, any updates? My only thought on cost is that I think you really want to make sure it's done right. If I were to go turbo, I would be more willing to spend a certain amount money on a well designed, well engineered, single turbo kit than a slapped together twin turbo kit. As long as the turbo kit has a steady torque curve without any wicked peaks, then it still might work for curvy racing applications.

-D'oh!
Old 03-28-2003, 06:35 PM
  #54  
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
zland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oceanside Ca
Posts: 6,086
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Am I the only guy a little frustrated that we do not have any turbo on the market yet? We supposely got the Stillen SC but to my knowledge, no one has it on yet and no track or Dyno results. I think it is pathetic that Stillen does not have Dyno results posted with the product anyways.

Some of you might say that it is too early but from my perspective, the VQ motor has been out for years (maybe not 3.5L) so adapting it to the Z cannot be a year long engineering problem.

When I began 350z.com last year, a lot of talk was on how great this car would be to mod. To date, it seems we do not have a marketable ECU, Turbo, or anything else besides a louder sound with 5-12 hp. I am hoping I can push this motor out to or close to 400hp and still have dependability. Am I being unrealistic?

Nismo need to be in the USA as promised for starters.

Jeff
Old 04-06-2003, 02:31 PM
  #55  
Del350
Registered User
 
Del350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any word on a production date?
Old 04-07-2003, 09:39 PM
  #56  
axis007
Banned
Thread Starter
 
axis007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: somewhere in Orange County
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

still working on it,

the engine is really TIGHT on space,

if it works well, we will probably do one for the G35 coupe, it is basically the same car.
Old 04-07-2003, 11:22 PM
  #57  
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
zland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oceanside Ca
Posts: 6,086
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

axis007:

Can You give us a little more detail of work in progress such as expect range of hp and issues still being worked on before release?
Old 04-08-2003, 04:24 PM
  #58  
arpus809
Registered User
 
arpus809's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: new jersey
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Strange. I agree with you about a single being able to spool faster. I ha d a 94 supra with HKS 2835 turbos made as much as 809RWHP but the lag was bad. my buddy had a T78 made about the same power and even that turbo that is not ballbearing spooled faster.
Old 04-08-2003, 09:36 PM
  #59  
GradZ
Registered User
 
GradZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Axis, I hope this turbo kit you're speaking of produces better numbers than the Greddy version. They're saying figures around the neighborhood of 345hp! Not 345WHP, 345HP!
Old 04-09-2003, 03:29 AM
  #60  
mytalon
Registered User
 
mytalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Power extreme has a 400+ kit. With a twin setup the turbo is only spooling of a bank of 3 cyl for each turbo with the single there are 6 to spool that is why it is faster. The point of the twins is to use smaller and spool faster to make the same power (stock) That is why the 300ZX had twins. I would think the theory would be a little different with the supras sequential setup.

I doubt that you could get a single on the 350 there isn't enough room to make both manifold meet at the single turbo. IMO. Stranger things have happened though.


Quick Reply: Turbo Kit for 350Z



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 AM.