Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Changes from year to year

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 12:29 PM
  #1  
aggietsi's Avatar
aggietsi
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Royse City, TX
Default Changes from year to year

I KNOW I've seen this before, and I'm trying to find it again. Does anyone have a definitive list of the changes from year to year, trim to trim? I know that the weight difference between the 2003 and the 2006 is quite significant, I just wanted to see what else has changed.

Sorry if this is a massive repost.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #2  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

What trim are you looking for? are we talking coupe or roadster? is your budget for a base model of fully loaded touring ??
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #3  
aggietsi's Avatar
aggietsi
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Royse City, TX
Default

Definitely a coupe. At least an enthusiast, possibly a track.

Originally Posted by JasonZ-YA
What trim are you looking for? are we talking coupe or roadster? is your budget for a base model of fully loaded touring ??
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #4  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

year by year the Z has gotten heavier and comes with more and more bling. Ultimately the car has generally had the same performance, but handling has gotten maybe slightly worse.

Even the 300hp engines that come with manuals isn't really a definite improvement over the 287hp engine. The engine internals seem to be stronger, but mainly it's powerband shifted to have more power up high and less down low. It's ability to rev higher is countered by the added weight in the rest of the car

IMO the 2004 Z's are the ideal model to get
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 01:24 PM
  #5  
aggietsi's Avatar
aggietsi
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Royse City, TX
Default

2004 is kinda what I was thinking. Not as heavy as the newer, but they (hopefully) fixed some of the problems with the first year.

What were the problems with the 2003? I am hoping to also pick up a 90 or 91 Z32TT (where my heart truly lies). I thought it might be cool to have the initial years of both cars.

Originally Posted by sentry65
year by year the Z has gotten heavier and comes with more and more bling. Ultimately the car has generally had the same performance, but handling has gotten maybe slightly worse.

Even the 300hp engines that come with manuals isn't really a definite improvement over the 287hp engine. The engine internals seem to be stronger, but mainly it's powerband shifted to have more power up high and less down low. It's ability to rev higher is countered by the added weight in the rest of the car

IMO the 2004 Z's are the ideal model to get
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lapham3
Maintenance & Repair
8
Oct 7, 2022 03:15 PM
Uriyo_
Exterior & Interior
22
Sep 8, 2021 08:46 AM
Mattg350z
Buying/Leasing
4
Oct 2, 2015 06:51 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 PM.