Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Intake, MREV2, Spacer & More... no perf

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2007 | 08:06 AM
  #1  
pcressey's Avatar
pcressey
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: California
Angry Intake, MREV2, Spacer & More... no perf

I purchased a few bolt on mods for my 350Z over the course of the last month... you can see the list in my sig. I wasn't expecting a huge gain, but nothing at all?

My friend/roommate owns an '03 350Z Track model and we have raced numerous times. His car is bone stock other than Injen intake. Before and after my mods... there is NO difference when we race.

I ran a 9.1 @ 77 MPH in the 1/8 last night with a 2.1 60'... I don't know what that means since that is the first time I have ever ran the 1/8. The car ran a 14.4 @ 95 in the 1/4 at 4,600ft above sea level bone stock.

I don't know what to do now... should I flash the ECU? I have put $2000 into mods and installs, and have gained nothing.

Any ideas would be appreciated...

Thanks,
Paul
Old 04-27-2007 | 08:24 AM
  #2  
HondaKiller's Avatar
HondaKiller
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

at 4600 ft your kinda screwed. the HP/TQ loss at that level is extreme, and gaining HP with mods is even more extreme. We see little to no gains at sea level let alone being up that high. Sorry bro, getting a turbo or SC will be your only solution to solid HP gains at high altitudes.
Old 04-27-2007 | 08:28 AM
  #3  
ldawg32's Avatar
ldawg32
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Long Island Ny
Default

Originally Posted by HondaKiller
at 4600 ft your kinda screwed. the HP/TQ loss at that level is extreme, and gaining HP with mods is even more extreme. We see little to no gains at sea level let alone being up that high. Sorry bro, getting a turbo or SC will be your only solution to solid HP gains at high altitudes.

very well put. +1 on that
Old 04-27-2007 | 08:29 AM
  #4  
Audible Mayhem's Avatar
Audible Mayhem
My350z
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 3
From: United States
Default

get rid of the injen intake and get a Kn N drop in filter, the cold airs lose power all day on my dyno...

plus when i had one on my car a long time ago at the track, i took it off and put the stock air box and picked up 1.5 mph and over a 1/10th in the 1/4
Old 04-27-2007 | 08:42 AM
  #5  
kourosH's Avatar
kourosH
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Default

Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
get rid of the injen intake and get a Kn N drop in filter, the cold airs lose power all day on my dyno...

plus when i had one on my car a long time ago at the track, i took it off and put the stock air box and picked up 1.5 mph and over a 1/10th in the 1/4
POPCHARGER!
Old 04-27-2007 | 08:44 AM
  #6  
pcressey's Avatar
pcressey
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Thanks for the replies... I should clarify just a bit.

The only time I ran the car at high elevation was for the 1/4 mile runs. The 1/8 mile was pretty close to sea level, and when I race my friend we are on the coast.

I would think with the UO Crank Pulley and the Intake Manifold alone I should at least walk a bit on my buddies stock '03.

I guess you have to drop close to $8k on forced induction to gain that valuable second or two.
Old 04-27-2007 | 08:49 AM
  #7  
davidf's Avatar
davidf
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,668
Likes: 0
From: Beaumont, Texas
Default

If you have to purchase a stock airbox try to find an 06.
Old 04-27-2007 | 09:04 AM
  #8  
z2envy's Avatar
z2envy
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, FL
Default

You can turn the injen CAI into a short ram can't you?
Old 04-27-2007 | 09:06 AM
  #9  
pcressey's Avatar
pcressey
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by z2envy
You can turn the injen CAI into a short ram can't you?
Yes. Would it really make much of a difference?
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:14 AM
  #10  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

sucking air through a short straw is easier than sucking air through a long straw.
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:16 AM
  #11  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

:sighs:

I can't say how many times I've recommended other members not using a cold air yet they swear that I'm wrong
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:18 AM
  #12  
MustGoFastR's Avatar
MustGoFastR
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Default

Do a reflash to tune what you have and raise the rev limiter, then forget about the bolt-ons and get a 3.9 FD. You won't regret it.
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:20 AM
  #13  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

By the way:

I don't believe Tony @ motordyne ever advertized that the MREV2+spacer will make better 1/4 mile times at the track. Only that it increases torque a lot without sacrificing too much peak HP.

I've heard a few accounts of people running stock rev-up plenum at the track, and consistently trapping higher MPH than any non-revups with mrev2+spacer.

The revup definitely has more power in the top end (in stock form). My impression is that adding the MREV2+spacer to a revup will add a lot of midrange torque but will not really help the top end.

Mrev2+spacer is more about improving the driving feel. If you don't like what they have done to your top end, then I will remind you that Tony has a money back guarantee.

Last edited by Wired 24/7; 05-01-2007 at 04:22 AM.
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:22 AM
  #14  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by blasian
:sighs:

I can't say how many times I've recommended other members not using a cold air yet they swear that I'm wrong
+1 ... I guess people don't realize the stock intake is CAI already, only it has a shorter tube, and less heat soak than most other intakes.
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:23 AM
  #15  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

If you ran 9.1 seconds, then 9.0 seconds, then 9.2 seconds, what would that tell you? I’m afraid the one days testing at the dragstrip is a poor tool.
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:33 AM
  #16  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

Originally Posted by blasian
:sighs:

I can't say how many times I've recommended other members not using a cold air yet they swear that I'm wrong
wrong again my friend LOL
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:35 AM
  #17  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
wrong again my friend LOL
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:35 AM
  #18  
timmywick's Avatar
timmywick
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: anaheim, ca.
Default

Seems $ to bolt on = not really worth it>xcept self satisfy... Save cash and go big............fi
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:37 AM
  #19  
pcressey's Avatar
pcressey
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Wired 24/7
By the way:

I don't believe Tony @ motordyne ever advertized that the MREV2+spacer will make better 1/4 mile times at the track. Only that it increases torque a lot without sacrificing too much peak HP.

I've heard a few accounts of people running stock rev-up plenum at the track, and consistently trapping higher MPH than with mrev2+spacer.

Mrev2+spacer is more about improving the driving feel. If you don't like what they have done to your top end, then I will remind you that Tony has a money back guarantee.
Really? Directly off www.motordyneengineering.com:

"This stealth modification adds 11HP-13HP and reduces the effect of power robbing heat soak. The 5/16" plenum spacer is fully compatible with all stock and aftermarket strut bars."

"Multiple independent test show when used with a 5/16" spacer on the REVUP engine, the combination will add a "minimum" of 15+ HP and 18+ TQ in the upper midrange. Many independent MREV 2 Manifold REVUP tests have dynod in excess of 20HP and 30 TQ in the upper midrange and with high RPM peak power increased by 3-5 HP."

The car does feel more responsive and better, but the actually HP is not there. I am taking it to the SoCal Dyno Day in May... so I will see the actually RWHP.
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:37 AM
  #20  
timmywick's Avatar
timmywick
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: anaheim, ca.
Default

Originally Posted by blasian
:sighs:

I can't say how many times I've recommended other members not using a cold air yet they swear that I'm wrong
K&N and stock air box..............works as good as 200plus intakes. (if not better) Smart man



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:18 AM.