HKS DLI II ??? does ti make a diffrence?
Originally Posted by duckypower
i would like to know if it makes any NA power difference?
or should i use 500 dollars somewere else!
or should i use 500 dollars somewere else!
Originally Posted by duckypower
i would like to know if it makes any NA power difference?
or should i use 500 dollars somewere else!
or should i use 500 dollars somewere else!
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by duckypower
i would like to know if it makes any NA power difference?
or should i use 500 dollars somewere else!
or should i use 500 dollars somewere else!
Originally Posted by Zivman
NOTHING makes any N/A power difference. Haven't people learned this by now? Nitrous or FI are your options for power
The advantage to the DLI II is it lets you run a larger gap on your plugs because it improves spark. When you're NA, its not that big a deal since we have a fairly wide gap. When you're FI, you need to run a smaller gap plug which is more prone to being fouled. This lets you run a larger gap for FI which is basically insurance on your motor, not a performance adder.
Originally Posted by Zivman
NOTHING makes any N/A power difference. Haven't people learned this by now? Nitrous or FI are your options for power
I know, I thought it was weird too.
I mean, one dynojet dyno said 281whp, another said 285whp and later a dyno dynamics said 272whp. I could swear the car was quite a bit faster but like you said, NA mods don't do anything at all
Originally Posted by sentry65
strange, when I was NA I gained 40-50whp with cams, headers, plenum, HF cats, exhaust, intake, pulley, and tune along with tilton clutch/flywheel and 3.9 final drive
I know, I thought it was weird too.
I mean, one dynojet dyno said 281whp, another said 285whp and later a dyno dynamics said 272whp. I could swear the car was quite a bit faster but like you said, NA mods don't do anything at all
I know, I thought it was weird too.
I mean, one dynojet dyno said 281whp, another said 285whp and later a dyno dynamics said 272whp. I could swear the car was quite a bit faster but like you said, NA mods don't do anything at all

Pully, tilton, 3.9??? They dont add power. The key word in that is TUNE!

And yes, with the 3.9 the car does feel quite a bit faster.
OP: be patient and wait, there realy isnt too many mods that you can do NA that will benifit you in FI. So be patient, save up, and get ready for a long bumpy road to FI.
Originally Posted by sentry65
strange, when I was NA I gained 40-50whp with cams, headers, plenum, HF cats, exhaust, intake, pulley, and tune along with tilton clutch/flywheel and 3.9 final drive
I know, I thought it was weird too.
I mean, one dynojet dyno said 281whp, another said 285whp and later a dyno dynamics said 272whp. I could swear the car was quite a bit faster but like you said, NA mods don't do anything at all
I know, I thought it was weird too.
I mean, one dynojet dyno said 281whp, another said 285whp and later a dyno dynamics said 272whp. I could swear the car was quite a bit faster but like you said, NA mods don't do anything at all

that's too bad your car wasn't any faster. Mine was unquestionably faster than stock. My dad had just bought an auto C6 vette and I could almost hold my own with him until around 60-70mph
I had different goals for my car then than I do now and I was mainly focused on improving everything, not just the power, so I was more inclined to spend 10k on making well rounded improvements
the car dropped 100 lbs (almost 1/4 of it being rotational mass), gained 40-50whp, handled better, had better cooling capacity, and was still reliable (or at least more reliable than going FI was known for at that time) My Z was my only car at the time so reliability was the #1 issue
Back then there were greddy's and ATI's blowing up engines everywhere and the APS TT had just been announced to be coming out and was unproven. ST's didn't exist yet so it was either greddy, PE, stillen, ATI, vortech, nitrous, or NA.
I had different goals for my car then than I do now and I was mainly focused on improving everything, not just the power, so I was more inclined to spend 10k on making well rounded improvements
the car dropped 100 lbs (almost 1/4 of it being rotational mass), gained 40-50whp, handled better, had better cooling capacity, and was still reliable (or at least more reliable than going FI was known for at that time) My Z was my only car at the time so reliability was the #1 issue
Back then there were greddy's and ATI's blowing up engines everywhere and the APS TT had just been announced to be coming out and was unproven. ST's didn't exist yet so it was either greddy, PE, stillen, ATI, vortech, nitrous, or NA.
Last edited by sentry65; Oct 29, 2007 at 01:03 PM.
Originally Posted by sentry65
that's too bad your car wasn't any faster. Mine was unquestionably faster than stock. My dad had just bought an auto C6 vette and I could almost hold my own with him until around 60-70mph
I had different goals for my car then than I do now and I was mainly focused on improving everything, not just the power, so I was more inclined to spend 10k on making well rounded improvements
the car dropped 100 lbs (almost 1/4 of it being rotational mass), gained 40-50whp, handled better, had better cooling capacity, and was still reliable (or at least more reliable than going FI was known for at that time) My Z was my only car at the time so reliability was the #1 issue
Back then there were greddy's and ATI's blowing up engines everywhere and the APS TT had just been announced to be coming out and was unproven. ST's didn't exist yet so it was either greddy, PE, stillen, ATI, vortech, nitrous, or NA.
I had different goals for my car then than I do now and I was mainly focused on improving everything, not just the power, so I was more inclined to spend 10k on making well rounded improvements
the car dropped 100 lbs (almost 1/4 of it being rotational mass), gained 40-50whp, handled better, had better cooling capacity, and was still reliable (or at least more reliable than going FI was known for at that time) My Z was my only car at the time so reliability was the #1 issue
Back then there were greddy's and ATI's blowing up engines everywhere and the APS TT had just been announced to be coming out and was unproven. ST's didn't exist yet so it was either greddy, PE, stillen, ATI, vortech, nitrous, or NA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM
Tochigi_236
Feedback & Suggestions for Our Forum
8
Sep 27, 2015 03:40 PM





