Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Lsx 03 350z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2010 | 11:26 AM
  #141  
Royal_T's Avatar
Royal_T
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 14
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

^^ you are talking about Snyper, which is the one that all started this and is the man for his build.. If you don't know he has already add a T88 to his LS2 and is crazy.. Check out his build here.. http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conver...8mm-turbo.html

As far as weight goes and space.. The LS ways less then the VQ and there is more space, bottom line..
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 11:34 AM
  #142  
03threefiftyz's Avatar
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 118
From: Frederick, MD
Default

Havoks swap is uber clean.....got a chance to see it this weekend....


It's amazing how low the ls motors sit in comparison to VQ...
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 11:46 AM
  #143  
Royal_T's Avatar
Royal_T
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 14
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

^^ soooo sick... I can't wait to start mine, I have some surprises for you guys..
Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #144  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by Royal_T
^^ you are talking about Snyper, which is the one that all started this and is the man for his build.. If you don't know he has already add a T88 to his LS2 and is crazy.. Check out his build here.. http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conver...8mm-turbo.html

As far as weight goes and space.. The LS ways less then the VQ and there is more space, bottom line..
The LS is not lighter than the VQ. It is a bit heavier but not a significant amount in my opinion. It is a bit longer but is narrower and shorter than the VQ by quite a bit. I was able to fit my LS1 with Vette oil pan and intake manifold under a tonneau cover in a Nissan Titan. That is how much shorter it is than the VQ.
Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 06:03 PM
  #145  
Royal_T's Avatar
Royal_T
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 14
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

^^ well I know that when Snyper put in the LS2 motor he was 265lbs lighter than a stock 350z.. Now he added all the turbo, plus turbo piping and FMI and he weighs 3320(+/- 20lbs scale resolution) which is Better than stock. Stock is 3365, and the engine sits about 4" lower than the stock engine...so its lighter with a better center of gravity. This is his findings after weighing his car, not mine.. I plan on doing a before and after weight to see the differences
Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 03:32 AM
  #146  
Havok_RLS2's Avatar
Havok_RLS2
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Royal_T
^^ well I know that when Snyper put in the LS2 motor he was 265lbs lighter than a stock 350z.. Now he added all the turbo, plus turbo piping and FMI and he weighs 3320(+/- 20lbs scale resolution) which is Better than stock. Stock is 3365, and the engine sits about 4" lower than the stock engine...so its lighter with a better center of gravity. This is his findings after weighing his car, not mine.. I plan on doing a before and after weight to see the differences
Snyper musta lied to you then because the LS is in no way lighter than the VQ. The LS have been found to the between 80 to 100 lbs heavier than the VQ and it make the Z more nose heavy because more weight is sitting in front of the front wheels instead of behind it like on the VQ. But look.... You don't have to take my word for it. You don't have to listen to anything I have to say on the matter. It's not like I know anything right?
I might as well stop posting to this thread since it's such a waste of time.

Quamen you can PM me if you have any questions I can help answer. The rest of you can go kick rocks for all I care.
Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 06:27 AM
  #147  
Royal_T's Avatar
Royal_T
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 14
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

^^ Wooow,, you don't have to get all defensive over the matter. I was just stating what another member found out when he went to weigh his car. Never said he was right or I was right...
Reply
Old May 11, 2010 | 07:28 PM
  #148  
UCIgrad's Avatar
UCIgrad
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Newport Beach, CA
Default

Has anyone seen this: http://paceperformance.com/index.asp...&ProdID=282653

These EROD engines apparently are CARB certified implementations of the LS3. The site has links to the mating transmission as well. The package comes with everything needed to be CARB compliant. Pricing is a little steep at $8200 for the engine and the CARB required components. Another $2900 for the tranny. That's getting close to $12k without all the labor, welds, mounts, tuning, and other customization to make it work. So the $20k number Havok mentioned is probably spot on.

Nevertheless, with this you get a brand new CARB approved LS3 620Z. I plan on waiting until my motor flatlines in another 5 years before I take on this endeavor. Just thought if anyone in Cali was attempting this monstrosity the above link might be something to consider.
Reply
Old May 11, 2010 | 08:02 PM
  #149  
UCIgrad's Avatar
UCIgrad
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Newport Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Royal_T
^^ well I know that when Snyper put in the LS2 motor he was 265lbs lighter than a stock 350z.. Now he added all the turbo, plus turbo piping and FMI and he weighs 3320(+/- 20lbs scale resolution) which is Better than stock. Stock is 3365, and the engine sits about 4" lower than the stock engine...so its lighter with a better center of gravity. This is his findings after weighing his car, not mine.. I plan on doing a before and after weight to see the differences
The GMPP Catalog lists the weight of the LS3 crate engine at 415 pounds. Our VQ weighs 313. So that's about 1.04 1bs per horsepower for our VQ versus 1.08 lbs per horsepower for the LS3. Similar efficiencies.

When comparing total weight:
2005 Enthusiast stock curb weight: 3221 (10.7 lbs / horsepower)
2005 Enthusiast LS3 curb weight: 3323 (7.7 lbs / horsepower)
Reply
Old May 12, 2010 | 04:15 AM
  #150  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by UCIgrad
Has anyone seen this: http://paceperformance.com/index.asp...&ProdID=282653

These EROD engines apparently are CARB certified implementations of the LS3. The site has links to the mating transmission as well. The package comes with everything needed to be CARB compliant. Pricing is a little steep at $8200 for the engine and the CARB required components. Another $2900 for the tranny. That's getting close to $12k without all the labor, welds, mounts, tuning, and other customization to make it work. So the $20k number Havok mentioned is probably spot on.

Nevertheless, with this you get a brand new CARB approved LS3 620Z. I plan on waiting until my motor flatlines in another 5 years before I take on this endeavor. Just thought if anyone in Cali was attempting this monstrosity the above link might be something to consider.
Other than the fact that you can't pass emissions with a motor from a different make than the car. It's not to say you couldn't pass the test itself but it is still not technically legal.
Reply
Old May 12, 2010 | 05:48 AM
  #151  
Highway Riding's Avatar
Highway Riding
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 95
From: Out on the Highway!
Default

I remember Snyper before he was banned. He spoke of this build like last year.. Nice to see it came to fruition... Makes me wanna replicate his build in my s14...
Reply
Old May 12, 2010 | 07:43 AM
  #152  
UCIgrad's Avatar
UCIgrad
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Newport Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Quamen
Other than the fact that you can't pass emissions with a motor from a different make than the car. It's not to say you couldn't pass the test itself but it is still not technically legal.
I don't believe that to true anymore. I once thought it was, but someone here in the GTM VK56 thread corrected me by citing proof of the actual CARB legislation. From what I have read:

- Engine & tranny can't be from a heavy duty vehicle.
- Engine & tranny need to be newer than your model car.
- Engine & tranny need to go together. (Can't mix and match.)
- All emissions equipment from the donor model must be installed and working by producing the proper codes.

It seems that this kit will do that.
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 04:06 AM
  #153  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by UCIgrad
I don't believe that to true anymore. I once thought it was, but someone here in the GTM VK56 thread corrected me by citing proof of the actual CARB legislation. From what I have read:

- Engine & tranny can't be from a heavy duty vehicle.
- Engine & tranny need to be newer than your model car.
- Engine & tranny need to go together. (Can't mix and match.)
- All emissions equipment from the donor model must be installed and working by producing the proper codes.

It seems that this kit will do that.
I may stand corrected then. Either way, I don't think I would want this swap in Cali. I hear horror stories of people with all CARB approved components getting their car inspected all the time when they get pulled over. I could only imagine what it would be like when the cop saw an LS motor in there.
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #154  
Highway Riding's Avatar
Highway Riding
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 95
From: Out on the Highway!
Default

Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz
Havoks swap is uber clean.....got a chance to see it this weekend....


It's amazing how low the ls motors sit in comparison to VQ...
The welds on that intake remind of something out of top secret or bee racing.. nice..
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2010 | 05:52 AM
  #155  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

LS1 in the engine bay:





Engine mounts are made and tacked together. Just sent them out to the welder to be finished. Oil pan is complete and installed. 60-2 timing ring is being put on the crank pulley and I am going to start making the mounts for the TH400. Hoping to be 75-90% done by the end of June.

Last edited by Quamen; Jun 4, 2010 at 05:54 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2010 | 06:40 AM
  #156  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by UCIgrad
I don't believe that to true anymore. I once thought it was, but someone here in the GTM VK56 thread corrected me by citing proof of the actual CARB legislation. From what I have read:

- Engine & tranny can't be from a heavy duty vehicle.
- Engine & tranny need to be newer than your model car.
- Engine & tranny need to go together. (Can't mix and match.)
- All emissions equipment from the donor model must be installed and working by producing the proper codes.

It seems that this kit will do that.
i'm not from cali but i could have sworn that the "engine and tranny has to be from a newer model" also has a statement that it has to be from THE SAME MODEL.

unless they changed it in the last month i'm almost certain that the engine is required to come from the same make and model vehicle. could have changed though

that was one of the reasons that the vk56 swap gtm was doing would be for "track use only" or cars registered out of state (from california). I think they have the exact laws with statue codes in their thread.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2010 | 07:41 AM
  #157  
UCIgrad's Avatar
UCIgrad
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Newport Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by binder
i'm not from cali but i could have sworn that the "engine and tranny has to be from a newer model" also has a statement that it has to be from THE SAME MODEL.

unless they changed it in the last month i'm almost certain that the engine is required to come from the same make and model vehicle. could have changed though

that was one of the reasons that the vk56 swap gtm was doing would be for "track use only" or cars registered out of state (from california). I think they have the exact laws with statue codes in their thread.
The reason why the GTM VK56 wasn't going to work is because the manifold wouldn't fit without significant modifcation thus violating CARB. Also, the mated tranny would have to be one of the TITAN's automatic transmissions. Having a manual tranny mated to the VK56 wouldn't pass CARB either. In that same thread one our premier members corrected me and pointed out several cars that have had transplants done from other makes. It's more popular than we may think. Especially in the Mazda crowd. Lots of LS motors on the RX-7 scene.

It's really the only way to significantly increase power legally. The only legal FI route is Vortech.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2010 | 09:06 AM
  #158  
350z006's Avatar
350z006
New Member
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 15
From: Long Beach, CA
Default

I believe the HKS supercharger is CARB legal as well...

And Stillen, too...but its arguable how much of a power upgrade that actually is...

As a Cali guy, I really wonder if the potential hassle of an LS engine swap is worth it; the CARB guys can be really **** if you get referreed...I'm running a Vortech but with the mods I've made to it its definitely not Carb legal, even though to the standard cop they may not notice the mods...if I ever do get referred I just have to make some changes to my setup to make it CARB legal again...it's not quite so simple with an LS engine...

Originally Posted by UCIgrad

It's really the only way to significantly increase power legally. The only legal FI route is Vortech.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 08:10 PM
  #159  
Havok_RLS2's Avatar
Havok_RLS2
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Quamen
LS1 in the engine bay:





Engine mounts are made and tacked together. Just sent them out to the welder to be finished. Oil pan is complete and installed. 60-2 timing ring is being put on the crank pulley and I am going to start making the mounts for the TH400. Hoping to be 75-90% done by the end of June.

Looking good!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 08:15 PM
  #160  
Havok_RLS2's Avatar
Havok_RLS2
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
Default

Originally Posted by UCIgrad
The reason why the GTM VK56 wasn't going to work is because the manifold wouldn't fit without significant modifcation thus violating CARB. Also, the mated tranny would have to be one of the TITAN's automatic transmissions. Having a manual tranny mated to the VK56 wouldn't pass CARB either. In that same thread one our premier members corrected me and pointed out several cars that have had transplants done from other makes. It's more popular than we may think. Especially in the Mazda crowd. Lots of LS motors on the RX-7 scene.

It's really the only way to significantly increase power legally. The only legal FI route is Vortech.
True. The engine must be from the same model year or newer which is the reason I went with the LS2 vs the LS1 or LS6. VK56 is also like 60+lbs heavier I think than the LS motors not including whatever the trans weight is.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:16 PM.