What actually makes the cd009 better than the others besides being newer? I searched and couldn't find a good answer. And is it worth the swap from a cd003?

 

More synchronizers with better tolerance to boneheaded shifts.

Big diff between CD001 and 009.

 

Would the swap to a cd009 be worth the Labor and cost? Or is it more of a minimal difference?

 

That really depends on two factors: the condition of your current tranny and your skill in operating it. If you grind on most downshifts and have no idea how to heel/toe downshift, a new CD009 might really help.

 

My current transmission is pretty good. And im pretty decent at shifting. I didnt know if a cd009 is considered an upgrade or if its just kind of pointless. Especially since im saving up to go F/I i didnt know if thats when it would really help. I know the more hp you make, you need to upgrade clutch, flywheel, etc. I didnt know if this would help with that or no. Thanks guys for the help so far.

 

As dkmura said,it's all about the condition of current. If it needs replacing, it can be seen as a worthwhile endeavor. "Pretty good" condition means an 009 swap is pretty useless. No performance gain, as all gearing is exactly the same year to year.

 

Thats what i was thinking. Now come to think of it i do get a grind downshifting from 4th to 3rd if i dont change gears a little slower. So i dont know if thats a sign i need to change transmissions all together or wait.

 

Common/known problem in early transmission '03-'05 (or so). Synchronizers on third (and sometimes other gears) are soft and just-don't-work. I've nursed mine for 4+ years just being careful with double clutch and/or heel toe and no issues but a grind now and again reminding me I'm not as dextrous or speedy as I think I am.

 

Haha i know the feeling. Thank you for the help and advice guys.