Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Engine HP and rear wheel HP ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2004, 04:49 AM
  #1  
sparky3Z
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
sparky3Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Engine HP and rear wheel HP ratio?

For the 350Z, is there a rough rule of the ratio of engine HP to rear wheel HP? In other words, if your engine creates 287 HP, how much rear wheel HP would there likely be?
Old 03-25-2004, 05:10 AM
  #2  
Audito350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Audito350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yep... you are talking about "drivetrain loss" and in our cars it's roughly 15%. So, if you have 287 hp at the crank, you are about 243 hp at the rear wheels.

Likewise, when you makes mods and go dyno the car, the same 15% applies... so if you make 255 rwhp, that is about 293 crank hp.

Cheers,

PeteH
Old 03-25-2004, 05:12 AM
  #3  
jak
Registered User
 
jak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Everyone has been using around 17% drive train loss. So 287HP minus 17% equals 238 rwhp. This has been the average of what most people are getting on the dyno stock. Some have dynoed as low as the 220's and a few have dynoed 240's so 17% is IMO a more inclusive percentage.

Jeff

Last edited by jak; 03-25-2004 at 05:16 AM.
Old 03-25-2004, 05:42 AM
  #4  
sparky3Z
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
sparky3Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Audito350Z and jak! Very clear.
Old 03-25-2004, 06:39 AM
  #5  
Duflacci
Registered User
 
Duflacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: On top of your wife
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I concur with 17% loss
Old 03-25-2004, 07:45 AM
  #6  
JawKnee
Registered User
 
JawKnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I too would use 17%. Assuming the 17% drivetrain loss, you do NOT multiply the RWHP * 1.17 to get back to crank HP!

You would divide RWHP by 0.83.
Old 03-25-2004, 09:26 AM
  #7  
Lateapex
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Lateapex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think 17% is likely, given the persistent effort by manufacturers to improve efficiency, and because the rule-of-thumb for a 'front-engine-rear-drive' layout is 15% drivetrain loss. I suspect 15% is more accurate, and our cars actually have about 280hp.
Old 03-25-2004, 09:45 AM
  #8  
FLY BY Z
Registered User
 
FLY BY Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The fact of the matter is you have no idea how much HP we have at the motor because you have never put a VQ35DE on an engine dyno. You can't calculate drivetrain loss as a percentage over a span of more than one vehicle. Sorry. You just have what you have. None of us have the same thing and none of us have the same drivetrain loss either.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MAsSIVrOOM
Engine & Drivetrain
2
10-20-2023 10:50 AM
etkms
Engine & Drivetrain
29
06-19-2022 06:30 PM
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
01-02-2022 12:58 PM
hulkout
370Z Brakes & Suspension
7
04-28-2017 09:00 PM
bcoffee20
Zs & Gs For Sale
5
11-19-2015 06:39 PM



Quick Reply: Engine HP and rear wheel HP ratio?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 AM.