Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Adding Racing Fuel???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2004, 12:17 PM
  #21  
phile
Registered User
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central ny
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by jesseenglish
It's because you get more power when you raise the compression ratio. If you're running low octane fuel on a high compression motor the fuel will pre-ignite just from the pressures applied to it. You need fuel that won't burn prematurely to handle the higher pressure.
Ohh, that makes sense. So what about using low octane fuel in a low compression motor? Some people thought about lowering the compression of their engine before adding a turbo. I'm assuming they would benefit from low octane right?
Old 03-29-2004, 12:59 PM
  #22  
FLY BY Z
Registered User
 
FLY BY Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by phile
Ohh, that makes sense. So what about using low octane fuel in a low compression motor? Some people thought about lowering the compression of their engine before adding a turbo. I'm assuming they would benefit from low octane right?
Their pocketbook would certainly benefit as higher octane (ie more expensive) fuel is not needed with low compression as octane is only resistance to detonation. Less compression, less chance of premature detonation.
Old 03-29-2004, 01:11 PM
  #23  
jesseenglish
New Member
 
jesseenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you boost a low compression motor however, your effective compression ratio goes up.

Here's a formula for figuring CR at sea level.

E = C (( B / 14.7 ) + 1)

E = Effective CR
C = Static CR
B = Boost
14.7 = Atmospheric Air pressure


I actually wrote an editorial about this very thing for 350Zfrenzy last week. I'm assuming Jeremy is going to publish it for April. Haven't heard back from him though. I included a lot of good formulas in it. Such as figuring out altitude corrected HP, Atmospheric pressure loss etc.

I'll post about it when it's published.
Old 03-29-2004, 02:28 PM
  #24  
teh215
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
teh215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Posts: 5,753
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Wow, that equates to 15.9/1 with 8 psi of boost!!
Old 03-29-2004, 02:36 PM
  #25  
jesseenglish
New Member
 
jesseenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yep, it's 15.2:1 at 7 PSI. That's why you've got to pull timing.
Old 03-29-2004, 02:48 PM
  #26  
phile
Registered User
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central ny
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok, now how does timing factor in now. Oh, in case you havn't noticed, I know nothing about engines Maybe I should just go to howstuffworks.com
Old 03-29-2004, 04:40 PM
  #27  
jesseenglish
New Member
 
jesseenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Timing is all about getting the most power out of each stroke without detonation. The spark plug fires a certain number of degrees before the top dead center position of each cylinder's compression stroke. If it fires too early you'll get detonation, fire too late and you lose power and burn up exhaust valves. It takes a some time for the flame to fully start burning all the fuel after your spark plug fires. So your car's timing is set up to fire the spark plug a certain number of degrees before top dead center(BTDC). It has these degrees preprogrammed into the ECU. At 1000 RPM it might be 20 degrees BTDC at 2000 RPM it might be 22 degrees BTDC. The reason your cars timing advances as RPM's go up is because the engine is spinning faster giving it less time to burn the fuel. It must fire the plug earlier to allow enough time.

The ECU preprogramming is figuring timing for 91 octane fuel. Nissan engineers know approximately how long it takes for that to happen with our compression ratio using 91 octane. If you are using a lower grade octane the fuel burns faster so there is a collision/detonation between the flame and the cylinder. The cylinder will be trying to go up while the combustion is pushing down. That is detonation and can destroy engines very quickly.

Raising your compression ratio or boosting does the exact same thing as running octane that is too low. The higher compression causes the fuel to burn faster, so your spark plug will be firing too early. That is why you retard timing when you go FI.

Hopefully it cleared things up.
Old 03-29-2004, 05:08 PM
  #28  
zillinois
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
zillinois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So running 93 octane here in the Midwest does nothing?
Old 03-29-2004, 05:34 PM
  #29  
jesseenglish
New Member
 
jesseenglish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by zillinois
So running 93 octane here in the Midwest does nothing?
No, not really sorry. Unless you're below sea level, or have raised your compression a bit. It's unecessary to run anything higher than 91. In fact, I could probably go to 89 if I didn't have a supercharger because I'm at such a high elevation.
Old 03-29-2004, 06:03 PM
  #30  
phile
Registered User
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central ny
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That was a great explanation. Thanks for taking the time to help me understand
Old 03-29-2004, 06:36 PM
  #31  
12SecZ
Registered User
 
12SecZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NOR - CAL
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Real World Experience"

I bought a 5 gallon tank of 100 octane (over the 91 here) and it ruined my track day.

All trap speeds were actually lower, we figured after ruling everything else out the the ECU just didn't like it.

It did not help any , it actually cost me in lower traps.

Here is a pick of the 5 gallon can by my car. If it adds horse power I am sure I have probably tried it lol!

It's never fast emough!

Even some octane boost turns my 02 sensors a wierd red speckled color. I just run my 91. If I had decent 93 that would be great but we don't here just 91 which is currently about three hundred and fourty two dollars an ounce.
Attached Thumbnails Adding Racing Fuel???-gasatrack640.jpg  
Old 03-29-2004, 06:53 PM
  #32  
phile
Registered User
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central ny
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 12SecZ
If I had decent 93 that would be great but we don't here just 91 which is currently about three hundred and fourty two dollars an ounce.

Gas prices suck.

I was talking to a guy at school today. We were talking about the future of cars, alternative fuel, etc. He asked me, "what about the Harley guys? I don't want to be buzzing down the highway, barely audible, sounding like an electric golf cart"

Imagine an electric Harley with a complex speaker system that makes it sound like it's an internal combustion engine
Old 03-30-2004, 02:57 PM
  #33  
zxsaint
Fairlady Stalker
 
zxsaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Informative thread!

Being that the ECU is tuned for 91, would a timing advancement (+2) on an NA VQ benefit those with access to 93 more (or at all)?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
apex locator
Autocross/Road
10
07-23-2021 02:27 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
04-22-2021 09:42 PM



Quick Reply: Adding Racing Fuel???



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:04 AM.