Notices
Exterior & Interior 350Z Body modification, interior styling and lighting
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Less weight = more power; Have you lightened your Z?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2004, 08:50 AM
  #41  
rodH
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
rodH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: coto de caza, ca
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

there is a thread on an M3 forum on a step by step to lose about 300 pounds in that car or so. Some of it is extreme, some isn't.

I do happen to notice a difference when my gas is low (the rear ends breaks lose very easily too). I have added a sub and an amp and better speakers to my car, but I took out ALL the stereo junk which was pretty light wt, except the stock head unit was waaaaay heavier than my alpine. I can remove my sub, it is on rails similar to a car seat and slides right out when I want to save wt or need more room. I also saved wt with test pipes, will be gettting the nismo exhaust and UR pulley. My wheels and tires are 9 pounds lighter than stock total, but I bet than is negated by the wt being further out to the parameter.

for guys that take out the spare tire and tools, what do you do, bring a can of that tire patch stuff with you just in case???
Old 03-30-2004, 09:34 AM
  #42  
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the stock re040s are run flat...so why bother with a spare. i just dont care if i get a flat. ill call up my buddy and pick up my spare from my garage.
Old 03-30-2004, 09:38 AM
  #43  
jng1226
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jng1226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

AAA gets $50 a year to pick me up wherever I am - on a flatbed too.

What the hell do you do with your $1600 (retail replacement) Track Rays rim if you do put on the spare? I sure as hell am not going to leave it and come back for it, and I'm pretty sure it's not going to fit at all under the hatch, even with it wide open...
Old 03-30-2004, 11:38 AM
  #44  
phatshiet
Registered User
 
phatshiet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: far from you
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by S12 driver
Didn't someone swapped a SR20DET in their Z, and it weighs only 2700lbs? If you're serious about weight reduction, that may be a good choice.


Can anyone shed anymore info on this swap? It seems like a nice alternative to the vq35 in terms of rebuild and parts availability.
Old 03-30-2004, 12:29 PM
  #45  
phile
Registered User
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central ny
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What car uses the SR20DET btw?
Old 03-30-2004, 03:22 PM
  #46  
Mr B
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Mr B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Just another guy...
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Silvia in Japan used the SR20DET. I thought you were a know it all Phile. j/k
If you have lots of funds, you can do this swap. It's not easy Chris said and took him about 5 weeks.
Old 03-30-2004, 05:11 PM
  #47  
Drag Limited
Registered User
 
Drag Limited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

remember when you remove weight in front of the tires its more of an advantage, but in a 350z its a lil bit harder.
Old 03-30-2004, 05:13 PM
  #48  
Drag Limited
Registered User
 
Drag Limited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by phile
What car uses the SR20DET btw?
MY CAR!!! whoooo, it has a redtop sr20det but a blacktop is in the mail, should be extra fun!... check my site for more info
Old 03-30-2004, 07:49 PM
  #49  
phile
Registered User
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central ny
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Mr B
The Silvia in Japan used the SR20DET. I thought you were a know it all Phile. j/k
HEY! I'm glad you brought that up. I didn't type "know it all". Matter of fact, I didn't type anything for that. Is it possible a moderator put that there? The only other thing I can think of is that my GF put it there...put that's a looooooooooooooong shot.


Anyone have an idea?
Old 03-31-2004, 06:04 AM
  #50  
Lateapex
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Lateapex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMO, swapping-out the VQ35 for a 4-banger qualifies for the ridiculous-idea-of-the-week award. (Although, it's better than a small-block-swap, which some neandertal will no doubt attempt one day.)
Old 03-31-2004, 08:45 AM
  #51  
snolden
Registered User
 
snolden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Holbrook, AZ
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

somebody has already tried to swap the stock battery for an optima gel battery. Saving was about 9 lbs. I say moving it to the rear axle is the way to go. then you can have extra weight (traction) on the rear wheels yet still maintain less weight by taking out your spare/jack.

windshield wiper fluid is 8 lbs of extra (1 gallon) weight. That is an easy one and is in front of the front wheels.

remember by dropping all this weight you do play with the weight balance. in stock form the Z/G's already have too little traction. I stripped my trunk, yet ran worse quarter times (14.6 vs a 14.4) when I was stock on stock rubber. So unless you gots better tires than stock, leave the isht in your trunk.

if you lighten your exhaust you can put lowering springs or coilovers to make up for the higher center of gravity.
Old 03-31-2004, 09:02 AM
  #52  
Drag Limited
Registered User
 
Drag Limited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Lateapex
IMO, swapping-out the VQ35 for a 4-banger qualifies for the ridiculous-idea-of-the-week award. (Although, it's better than a small-block-swap, which some neandertal will no doubt attempt one day.)
I wouldent be so sure of that, they put a toyo 4 banger in a supra in Top Speed's car if I remember correctly and it was faster and less powerful than the I6 2jz thats cause its lighter and lower center of gravity helped it acheive a higher top speed than the extra power of the heavier and less centerd I6 could achieve.
Old 03-31-2004, 09:54 AM
  #53  
Lateapex
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Lateapex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Drag Limited
I wouldent be so sure of that, they put a toyo 4 banger in a supra in Top Speed's car if I remember correctly and it was faster and less powerful than the I6 2jz thats cause its lighter and lower center of gravity helped it acheive a higher top speed than the extra power of the heavier and less centerd I6 could achieve.
Oh, I'm not saying a person can't engineer a car that is ultimately faster w/such a swap -- I just consider it nothing more than a technical exercise, and a deliberate defacement of beauty. It violates Lateapex Axiom #1: always opt for more, smaller cylinders.
Old 03-31-2004, 09:58 AM
  #54  
Mr B
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Mr B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Just another guy...
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Lateapex
IMO, swapping-out the VQ35 for a 4-banger qualifies for the ridiculous-idea-of-the-week award. (Although, it's better than a small-block-swap, which some neandertal will no doubt attempt one day.)
Drag Limited is right. Even in the JGTC, Supra's were running the 3S-GTE cuz it was a lighter engine than the 2JZ-GTE and you can still make lots of power from them. So unless you're just drag racing, I would be amused to see how you fair against TopicsII on a road course.
Old 03-31-2004, 11:00 AM
  #55  
NOZ4U
Registered User
 
NOZ4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by DruDragzOn
I took out my spare tire and that heavy mat at the back. That's the only weight reduction I've done.

I was under the assumption that the spare tire added weight in the rear for traction and weight distribution. When the engineers design cars, don't they consider the weight of everything....even passengers, spare tire, jack, and gas for optimal performance? Kinda like how plane manufacturers have to consider the weight of wiring and screws for safety. I understand the ideology of reducing weight but when is it doing more harm than good. If I spend $5000 to get lightweight wheels and tires to save 40lbs, wouldn't that $5000 go a lot farther in adding FI to add 100hp so that 40 addtional pounds don't mean a thing ? Will removing the spare put less weight in the rear creating less force on the rear tires thus create less traction? With the removal of the spare, will the weight distribution change thus changing the center of gravity? This is the only reason why I haven't removed my spare yet.
Old 03-31-2004, 11:15 AM
  #56  
GY-Z
Registered User
 
GY-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Canada B.C.
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by NOZ4U
I If I spend $5000 to get lightweight wheels and tires to save 40lbs, wouldn't that $5000 go a lot farther in adding FI to add 100hp so that 40 addtional pounds don't mean a thing ?
u have to also keep in mind that straight acceleration isn't every thing.
when a car is lighter, the braking and cornering will also improve while ur accelration improves!
Old 03-31-2004, 11:25 AM
  #57  
NOZ4U
Registered User
 
NOZ4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by GY-Z
u have to also keep in mind that straight acceleration isn't every thing.
when a car is lighter, the braking and cornering will also improve while ur accelration improves!
But without the right amount of weight distribution (especially in the rear) your rear end would tend to kick out more around corners without the right weight pushing down on the tires. Unless or course you put softer springs in the rear to compensate.
Old 03-31-2004, 04:42 PM
  #58  
JPizzle
Registered User
 
JPizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: So Fla
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How heavy is a 2jz?
Old 03-31-2004, 11:24 PM
  #59  
Mr B
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Mr B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Just another guy...
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn heavy.
Old 04-01-2004, 12:04 AM
  #60  
shimz350z
Registered User
 
shimz350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: City of Lost Angels
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by phatshiet
Can anyone shed anymore info on this swap? It seems like a nice alternative to the vq35 in terms of rebuild and parts availability.
in japan aren't they swapping the skyline engines with the vq in the racing circuit? ...opposite of here.

ps. was the gtr ever rear wheel drive?....i'm not too familiar with the skylines but i thought they were awd ...or both in different versions


Quick Reply: Less weight = more power; Have you lightened your Z?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:27 PM.