better upgrade your base model headlights now(possible rumor)
this is the rumor, and the petition, take the information however you want.
*note the petition is to KEEP HID kits. not ban them, on the other forum a few people signed it thinking they were getting rid of the kits.
basicily they are making it illegal to sell HID kits because their thought is that cars without them do not have the proper optic properties to have them. obviously the Z kinda blows this one away, but I doubt little exceptions will be made.
*note the petition is to KEEP HID kits. not ban them, on the other forum a few people signed it thinking they were getting rid of the kits.
Petition : http://www.petitiononline.com/hidforum/petition.html
Info: http://hidforum.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=613
On or about 7/22/03, I was notified by Catz, along with some other vendors that they received a cease and desist order for the sale of HIDs starting 8/15/03. After that, there was a potential fine of $5k per day.
NHTSA stated that HID retrofit kits are non-compliant because they do not have a filament.
Whether or not this is true, I do not know. I do know however that the folks over at Catz are really worried and scared.
This might not be a "ban on sales" per say, but it might just be NHTSA enforcing non-compliance rules which can carry fines for the sale of non-compliant goods.
Info: http://hidforum.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=613
On or about 7/22/03, I was notified by Catz, along with some other vendors that they received a cease and desist order for the sale of HIDs starting 8/15/03. After that, there was a potential fine of $5k per day.
NHTSA stated that HID retrofit kits are non-compliant because they do not have a filament.
Whether or not this is true, I do not know. I do know however that the folks over at Catz are really worried and scared.
This might not be a "ban on sales" per say, but it might just be NHTSA enforcing non-compliance rules which can carry fines for the sale of non-compliant goods.
Originally posted by ares
this is the rumor, and the petition, take the information however you want.
*note the petition is to KEEP HID kits. not ban them, on the other forum a few people signed it thinking they were getting rid of the kits.
basicily they are making it illegal to sell HID kits because their thought is that cars without them do not have the proper optic properties to have them. obviously the Z kinda blows this one away, but I doubt little exceptions will be made.
this is the rumor, and the petition, take the information however you want.
*note the petition is to KEEP HID kits. not ban them, on the other forum a few people signed it thinking they were getting rid of the kits.
basicily they are making it illegal to sell HID kits because their thought is that cars without them do not have the proper optic properties to have them. obviously the Z kinda blows this one away, but I doubt little exceptions will be made.
Is this a bad thing? No. I have always been against HID "kits" which are falsely advertised. IMO, its never been okay to take a halogen headlight and simply change the bulb to HID equivelent (rebased) without making further changes. There are only a FEW headlamps capable of using both xenon and halogen bulbs, but its a very rare thing.
As for the Z headlamp, I dont think a retrofitted halogen headlamp is on the same level as the OEM HID headlamp. Even though I have worked with both the HID and Halogen lighting assemblies, I have not analyzed them enough to say for sure -- but I have good faith in saying that retrofits on the halogen headlamp is not an "ideal" choice. Good to hear the NHTSA is stepping in to mandate better lighting, its about time. Now all they need to do is go after certain factory HID headlamps -- S2000, Range Rover, and Escalades.
- Mike / ClearCorners.Com
Unless the info is highly incomplete, it just doesn't make sense.
First, the NHSTA wouldn't ban an HID bulb merely because it doesn't have a filament...NO bulbs used in HID systems have filaments, it's an arc system. Maybe the guy just read the report wrong, so I'd like to read the report myself.
Second, a true HID bulb would not work if it was merely re-based and plugged into a standard halogen socket. There's no high-voltage ballast to give it that initial "kick", so the bulb would never fire.
Based upon what few facts that can be gleaned here, I would say the NHSTA is trying to ban the faux-HID bulbs, the ones that have a blue look to them, but are merely painted/tinted for the blue look.
First, the NHSTA wouldn't ban an HID bulb merely because it doesn't have a filament...NO bulbs used in HID systems have filaments, it's an arc system. Maybe the guy just read the report wrong, so I'd like to read the report myself.
Second, a true HID bulb would not work if it was merely re-based and plugged into a standard halogen socket. There's no high-voltage ballast to give it that initial "kick", so the bulb would never fire.
Based upon what few facts that can be gleaned here, I would say the NHSTA is trying to ban the faux-HID bulbs, the ones that have a blue look to them, but are merely painted/tinted for the blue look.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by old_s13
Basically, the NHTSA is stepping in to remove all HID KITS from the aftermarket. This will include all kits consisting of HID bulbs re-based to fit halogen light housings -- thank god, its about time. This has always been illegal, its just that the NHTSA is starting to step in and enforce this law, finally. The good news is, this will not effect products like the Sylvania XenArc HID upgrades, which replace standard halogen sealed-beam light assemblies with DOT-compliant HID equivelents.
Is this a bad thing? No. I have always been against HID "kits" which are falsely advertised. IMO, its never been okay to take a halogen headlight and simply change the bulb to HID equivelent (rebased) without making further changes. There are only a FEW headlamps capable of using both xenon and halogen bulbs, but its a very rare thing.
As for the Z headlamp, I dont think a retrofitted halogen headlamp is on the same level as the OEM HID headlamp. Even though I have worked with both the HID and Halogen lighting assemblies, I have not analyzed them enough to say for sure -- but I have good faith in saying that retrofits on the halogen headlamp is not an "ideal" choice. Good to hear the NHTSA is stepping in to mandate better lighting, its about time. Now all they need to do is go after certain factory HID headlamps -- S2000, Range Rover, and Escalades.
- Mike / ClearCorners.Com
Basically, the NHTSA is stepping in to remove all HID KITS from the aftermarket. This will include all kits consisting of HID bulbs re-based to fit halogen light housings -- thank god, its about time. This has always been illegal, its just that the NHTSA is starting to step in and enforce this law, finally. The good news is, this will not effect products like the Sylvania XenArc HID upgrades, which replace standard halogen sealed-beam light assemblies with DOT-compliant HID equivelents.
Is this a bad thing? No. I have always been against HID "kits" which are falsely advertised. IMO, its never been okay to take a halogen headlight and simply change the bulb to HID equivelent (rebased) without making further changes. There are only a FEW headlamps capable of using both xenon and halogen bulbs, but its a very rare thing.
As for the Z headlamp, I dont think a retrofitted halogen headlamp is on the same level as the OEM HID headlamp. Even though I have worked with both the HID and Halogen lighting assemblies, I have not analyzed them enough to say for sure -- but I have good faith in saying that retrofits on the halogen headlamp is not an "ideal" choice. Good to hear the NHTSA is stepping in to mandate better lighting, its about time. Now all they need to do is go after certain factory HID headlamps -- S2000, Range Rover, and Escalades.
- Mike / ClearCorners.Com
macgyver what they are enforcing is the ban on hid retrofits into halogen housings. this means any hid bulb that isnt a d2r or d2s base. there are many kits like this that include a rebased bulb to fit a stock housing AND the ballast to make it work.
unfortunately i dont think those blue tinted halogens are illegal.
unfortunately i dont think those blue tinted halogens are illegal.
Originally posted by Mr B
The ban is already in effect and a lot of companies have closed their doors cuz they can't sell their kits anymore.
The ban is already in effect and a lot of companies have closed their doors cuz they can't sell their kits anymore.
When you take a product which is flawed by design, then take into account all the complaints the NHTSA has gotten regarding these lamps .. its easy to understand why the NHTSA has stepped up the rate of enforcement regarding these "kits."
Notice how NO MAJOR lighting manufacturer sells an " HID retrofit kit" in the US, and advertise it as "DOT compliant," this does not exist. If there was a way for a product like this to exist, large companies like Sylvania and Philips would be selling retrofit products geared to converted halogen headlight assemblies to use HID capsules. IF it was possible and legal.
What has happened, is that many smaller companies have compiled kits using Philips (or other brand) ballasts, and then created their own bulb which consists of an HID capsule which has been rebased in a halogen base. This allows any and everyone to take a HID bulb and insert it into a halogen assembly.
Of course, each headlamp is different. In most cases, these conversions result in a bright headlamp with flawed optics. As many people know, HID in general is very powerful technology and requires a good headlamp assembly.
A 35W HID bulb can emit just about the same light as a 120W halogen bulb. Problem is, the way it creates light is different than a halogen bulb.. so you need different headlamp assembly (or projector assembly). Some headlights take better than others, the Z is a fairly acceptable crossover headlamp but still, the bottom line is that its not legal.
So.. any vendor that sells such products should be careful, especially with the increased amount of enforcement from the NHTSA.
- Mike / ClearCorners.Com
That sounds odd. From my undertstanding you can sell or buy anything in this country and the only catch is that you have an intended use. For example, I currently have a 9000K Set of Hanabi HID's on my Toyota Tundra, hehe, but on the box it says that they are intended for off road use only. Maybe they can get away with selling them as long as they are not for cars that are being driven on the road. Either way, I already got mine...I am sure people will still be able to buy them from ebay.
Abel
Abel
SoCal350Z> That sounds odd. From my undertstanding you can sell or buy anything in this country and the only catch is that you have an intended use.
Incorrect. As far as the NHTSA is concerned, if a product has been manufactured to REPLACE or FIT a certain vehicle, then it must comply with the lighting standards. If it does not, then it is not legal for sale. As we all know, its REAL easy for a product NOT intended for street use to be on a street car. I can easily say that my car does not comply in MANY ways! hehe
SomeGuywitha-Z> yeah they can still sell it from another country through internet
Correct, but these items must also go through customs. I am sure if complaints get high enough, they can cap off which products are allowed to enter the US.
Incorrect. As far as the NHTSA is concerned, if a product has been manufactured to REPLACE or FIT a certain vehicle, then it must comply with the lighting standards. If it does not, then it is not legal for sale. As we all know, its REAL easy for a product NOT intended for street use to be on a street car. I can easily say that my car does not comply in MANY ways! hehe

SomeGuywitha-Z> yeah they can still sell it from another country through internet
Correct, but these items must also go through customs. I am sure if complaints get high enough, they can cap off which products are allowed to enter the US.
Yet another situation where if they don't like it they should enforce it at the bottom of the chain instead of the top. That's ALMOST (almost, not quite) as ridiculous as these yuppy mom's who want to ban any video game with a gun instead of getting of their fat minivan loving asses and being parents.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM




