Any kits to reduce C. of drag
Racing parts are more for down force than low drag.
Low drag is about disturbing the air as little as possible and hopefully not introducing any lift.
For an interesting taste of what could go wrong, the first year Audi TTs had all kinds of aerodynamic features, turns out in the right conditions they get air up under them and the whole car goes out from under you. They had a recall after some famous race driver lost his life on the back roads in the uk. They added stiffer springs and that little lip spoiler.
Chris
Low drag is about disturbing the air as little as possible and hopefully not introducing any lift.
For an interesting taste of what could go wrong, the first year Audi TTs had all kinds of aerodynamic features, turns out in the right conditions they get air up under them and the whole car goes out from under you. They had a recall after some famous race driver lost his life on the back roads in the uk. They added stiffer springs and that little lip spoiler.
Chris
performance nissan sponsors a few grand am racing cars.
as for hondas, the first company i ever heard of that wind tunnel tested their kits was mugen. from what i know about aerodynamics though C-West seems like it would be a good piece.
as for hondas, the first company i ever heard of that wind tunnel tested their kits was mugen. from what i know about aerodynamics though C-West seems like it would be a good piece.
Sponsor
Bulletproof Automotive
Bulletproof Automotive
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA / Chiba, Japan
Originally posted by Vlad
Smells like BS to me. You can add whatever you want to the car, run in around track and call it circuit tested. Unless they use a wind tunnel, it most probably will be bad aerodynamics/bad downforce combination.
It's time to admit that all kits are made for looks only. To proove it I'll mention the fact that no kit producer (except probably Nismo) offer any real aerodynamic data on their kits. So if you buying those kits for aerodynamics it's like looking for a safe car without checking safety tests ratings
Smells like BS to me. You can add whatever you want to the car, run in around track and call it circuit tested. Unless they use a wind tunnel, it most probably will be bad aerodynamics/bad downforce combination.
It's time to admit that all kits are made for looks only. To proove it I'll mention the fact that no kit producer (except probably Nismo) offer any real aerodynamic data on their kits. So if you buying those kits for aerodynamics it's like looking for a safe car without checking safety tests ratings
http://www.c-west.co.jp/labs/evo212.html
I guess you never been in the business of selling something...
If it's heavely sponsored team it'll run any bodykit sponsor tells it to run. After all it can't screw aerodynamics too badly. Good driver can win in any car.
All both racing teams in Grand Am series use Nismo kit. I'm not sure what racing teams you reffering to. Where they compete?
Gran AM series are small potatoes when compare to above metioned. JGTC are coming to US at Dec 18, and 19 this year in California speedway, I suggest you should go check it out.
And yeah smell the website that post by Topsecret2001.
http://www.c-west.co.jp/labs/fudo_rx7.html
There is some windtunnel data from C-West for the FD N1 kit.
Other than Mugen, I am not aware of any other Japanese Aftermarket manufacturer that actively uses wind tunnel testing in its designs, but most use track times (circuit testing)
There is some windtunnel data from C-West for the FD N1 kit.
Other than Mugen, I am not aware of any other Japanese Aftermarket manufacturer that actively uses wind tunnel testing in its designs, but most use track times (circuit testing)
Originally posted by Vlad
Smells like BS to me. You can add whatever you want to the car, run in around track and call it circuit tested. Unless they use a wind tunnel, it most probably will be bad aerodynamics/bad downforce combination.
It's time to admit that all kits are made for looks only. To proove it I'll mention the fact that no kit producer (except probably Nismo) offer any real aerodynamic data on their kits. So if you buying those kits for aerodynamics it's like looking for a safe car without checking safety tests ratings
Smells like BS to me. You can add whatever you want to the car, run in around track and call it circuit tested. Unless they use a wind tunnel, it most probably will be bad aerodynamics/bad downforce combination.
It's time to admit that all kits are made for looks only. To proove it I'll mention the fact that no kit producer (except probably Nismo) offer any real aerodynamic data on their kits. So if you buying those kits for aerodynamics it's like looking for a safe car without checking safety tests ratings
Originally posted by kzshin
I guess you never deal with serious racing team before, or pay attention to real professional racing. If your statment is true, how come we never see Wing west kit, or Kamnari kits on JGTC, BTCC, DTM, Le Man or WRC race cars.
I was exactly talking about serious racing when mentioned Nismo in Grand Am cup. I was there I saw it, I touched it. I saw Z getting 1,2,7,10 out of 48 cars in Ohio.I'm not aware of JGTC, Super Taikyu, and time attack. What channel I can see it on?
My statement still stands that most kits probably not screwing things too badly, so good driver doesn't care what front bumper is on the car as long as team got sponsor money. And no, it wan't go in serious races like LeMans, that's why you won't see that custom-import-tuning ugly kits in LeMans. Not that Z is in LeMans anyway. Did you watched LeMans this year by the way? I did, all 24 hours.
And yeah smell the website that post by Topsecret2001.
I was hoping it suppose to contain C-West aerodynamic data... Like downforce data etc... It has speed instead. Which can be greatly manipulated. Especially coming from manufacturers website. But okay, let's believe it's true data. Great. That makes 2 kits out of 100 worthy. Why do people buy the rest of the kits?
I guess you never deal with serious racing team before, or pay attention to real professional racing. If your statment is true, how come we never see Wing west kit, or Kamnari kits on JGTC, BTCC, DTM, Le Man or WRC race cars.
I was exactly talking about serious racing when mentioned Nismo in Grand Am cup. I was there I saw it, I touched it. I saw Z getting 1,2,7,10 out of 48 cars in Ohio.I'm not aware of JGTC, Super Taikyu, and time attack. What channel I can see it on?
My statement still stands that most kits probably not screwing things too badly, so good driver doesn't care what front bumper is on the car as long as team got sponsor money. And no, it wan't go in serious races like LeMans, that's why you won't see that custom-import-tuning ugly kits in LeMans. Not that Z is in LeMans anyway. Did you watched LeMans this year by the way? I did, all 24 hours.
And yeah smell the website that post by Topsecret2001.
I was hoping it suppose to contain C-West aerodynamic data... Like downforce data etc... It has speed instead. Which can be greatly manipulated. Especially coming from manufacturers website. But okay, let's believe it's true data. Great. That makes 2 kits out of 100 worthy. Why do people buy the rest of the kits?
Last edited by Vlad; Sep 14, 2004 at 06:21 AM.
Why "air temp-intake" is different? did they do tests on different days? You can't lower temp 10C by adding fancy bumper. At speed it'll be close to outside temp, no matter what bumber is there.
And once you mentioned it...
After close look to the kit you reffer too, I think it's a perfect example of my point. I.e. kits are about looks.
Look at the scoops I circled in red. What exactly are they function. As we can see from the other pictures from that link, they just open to water tank and some other internals in Evo's front.
They are TERRIBLE for aerodynamics. I don't have a degree in aerodynamics, but fallowing F1 for many years, I can say that things like that create huge turbulence = increase coefficient of drag tremendously.
And they don't create any downforce, since for part to create downforce, air should flow around it. So they don't have function, bad for aerodynamics, and innesential for downforce. But they look cool.
Perfect example of look-is-our-goal approach. If they'd care to get maximum performance, the'd smooth the area but leave those huge lips on the corners. But then it won't sell so good.
Thanks for providing example.
After close look to the kit you reffer too, I think it's a perfect example of my point. I.e. kits are about looks.
Look at the scoops I circled in red. What exactly are they function. As we can see from the other pictures from that link, they just open to water tank and some other internals in Evo's front.
They are TERRIBLE for aerodynamics. I don't have a degree in aerodynamics, but fallowing F1 for many years, I can say that things like that create huge turbulence = increase coefficient of drag tremendously.
And they don't create any downforce, since for part to create downforce, air should flow around it. So they don't have function, bad for aerodynamics, and innesential for downforce. But they look cool.
Perfect example of look-is-our-goal approach. If they'd care to get maximum performance, the'd smooth the area but leave those huge lips on the corners. But then it won't sell so good.
Thanks for providing example.
Sponsor
Bulletproof Automotive
Bulletproof Automotive
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA / Chiba, Japan
Originally posted by ihatethatbobbarker
nothing to say about the wind tunnel tested RX-7?
and i cant believe you think aerodynamics dont matter much in racing? they are one of the most important things...
nothing to say about the wind tunnel tested RX-7?
and i cant believe you think aerodynamics dont matter much in racing? they are one of the most important things...
Vlad, that link i posted has plenty of info to show that body kits can be functional performance enhancements. Besides adding downforce and smoothing air-flow, they may contain air ducts to help reduce engine bay temps. Your arguement that "You can't lower temp 10C by adding fancy bumper. At speed it'll be close to outside temp, no matter what bumber is there." is defunct. The data is there. Attack it how you will but it's more information than you've provided. Your arguements are mostly baseless accusations with nothing to back them up.
Originally posted by Vlad
Originally posted by kzshin
I guess you never deal with serious racing team before, or pay attention to real professional racing. If your statment is true, how come we never see Wing west kit, or Kamnari kits on JGTC, BTCC, DTM, Le Man or WRC race cars.
I was exactly talking about serious racing when mentioned Nismo in Grand Am cup. I was there I saw it, I touched it. I saw Z getting 1,2,7,10 out of 48 cars in Ohio.I'm not aware of JGTC, Super Taikyu, and time attack. What channel I can see it on?
Originally posted by kzshin
I guess you never deal with serious racing team before, or pay attention to real professional racing. If your statment is true, how come we never see Wing west kit, or Kamnari kits on JGTC, BTCC, DTM, Le Man or WRC race cars.
I was exactly talking about serious racing when mentioned Nismo in Grand Am cup. I was there I saw it, I touched it. I saw Z getting 1,2,7,10 out of 48 cars in Ohio.I'm not aware of JGTC, Super Taikyu, and time attack. What channel I can see it on?
american tv doesn't air alot of the big racing series in europe and japan, it's a shame because they're so much more entertaining that the nascar, cart, and irl crap we have in the states.
Sponsor
Bulletproof Automotive
Bulletproof Automotive
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA / Chiba, Japan
I know for a fact that Varis does the same testing as C-West and focuses more on performance than looks with their Aero Parts.
Just some more info to back it up.....
VARIS - Mitsubishi Lancer EVO Side Diffusers
Varis has developed a new concept aero part downforce It is simple, yet very effective air channeling technique. The undersides of each side diffuser channel air from directly behind the front wheels all the way back to a point before the rear wheels were it exits to each side of the vehicle. This technique not only gives the vehicle some much needed downforce, it also reduces drag by smoothing the airflow underneath the vehicle.

Just some more info to back it up.....
VARIS - Mitsubishi Lancer EVO Side Diffusers
Varis has developed a new concept aero part downforce It is simple, yet very effective air channeling technique. The undersides of each side diffuser channel air from directly behind the front wheels all the way back to a point before the rear wheels were it exits to each side of the vehicle. This technique not only gives the vehicle some much needed downforce, it also reduces drag by smoothing the airflow underneath the vehicle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
J Ritt
Brakes & Suspension
5
May 28, 2004 06:47 AM





