Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Started NA..wanting ~330rwhp..will I need internals for F/I?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:08 AM
  #1  
C5DEMON's Avatar
C5DEMON
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default Started NA..wanting ~330rwhp..will I need internals for F/I?

It seems there are more threads about building up the engine than actual F/I systems now. Is this because of the constant need for more power?

All I want is around 330rwhp.

What are my best options? I started NA, but it looks like I wouldn't be able to do much better than 270-280rwhp. I was considering stillen or vortech... also turbonetics single turbo.

What would be safest option? Besides the initial system, which will cost the most for extras to make it reliable? Will I need an internal build up with less than 350rwhp?

I read this section daily, but I'm still a little confused on the best route.

Thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:23 AM
  #2  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

Safest option = forged internals, which ironically equates out to the most expensive.

Drop the CR down to 9.5:1 and that would probably put you around 350'ish wheel hp.

But alteast with the Vortech and stock boost, with a good custom tune for 91 octane you should be a lil north of your 330 goal daily driven without having to worry about your VQ spilling it's oil.

Last edited by Juztin; Dec 22, 2004 at 08:26 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #3  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

And now thinking about it. For the best performance for your buck between the T and Vortech, becuase of our altitude I'd say you should probably consider the T. You'd have a funner power band with it, and the power output would be more equal to sea level than the vortech were it's "8" psi, but relatively it's actually ~6 here.

Least with the T you'd definately be pushing 8. Only thing I dont like about them is the ECU reflash, you'd have to revert to stock to competently run their tune. UR crank pulley excluded. But if you have some more open exhaust mods (cats, dual exhaust, etc...) it's something that you'd wanna tune for. Which case you dont have many options there, other than fedex best guess tuning, or taking the car out of state.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:49 AM
  #4  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default Re: Started NA..wanting ~330rwhp..will I need internals for F/I?

Originally posted by C5DEMON
It seems there are more threads about building up the engine than actual F/I systems now. Is this because of the constant need for more power?

All I want is around 330rwhp.

What are my best options? I started NA, but it looks like I wouldn't be able to do much better than 270-280rwhp. I was considering stillen or vortech... also turbonetics single turbo.

What would be safest option? Besides the initial system, which will cost the most for extras to make it reliable? Will I need an internal build up with less than 350rwhp?

I read this section daily, but I'm still a little confused on the best route.

Thanks!
The reason for the rebuilds and build-ups is primarly reliability. The stock Z internals have proven a bit weak for F/I applications is some peoples cars. Of course, so many variables could be at play in regards to why the engines failed. But after seeing 20 or so blow-ups from TT's, many of us decided to get forged internals and do the build-up correctly.

You could certainly go forged and leave the power around 350whp. But it's nice to have the safety and ability to push the engine much further if you so desire.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:51 AM
  #5  
C5DEMON's Avatar
C5DEMON
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

I will be moving south in a year or so. I'm not too worried about altitude!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 09:16 AM
  #6  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

c5demon:
go turbo! i've talked to several guys who went s/c and they regretted it!...turbo, in my opinion, is the way to go!
you might change your mind in your power desire in a year or two, you can just retune the car and tuen up the boost via a boost controller (e-01)...s/c doesnt allow you that luxary...if you are gonna do this f/i thing...do a rebuild, enough people have done it and are soon gonna be doing it (me) that is should be a "smooth enough" process....then you can run 330rwhp if you want (you won't)..or turn it up to 500rwhp! or more! with much more peace of mind!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 09:25 AM
  #7  
DLin05's Avatar
DLin05
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

I am at 330rwhp with my HKS SC
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 09:39 AM
  #8  
C5DEMON's Avatar
C5DEMON
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

My C5 had right over 300 and I was pretty pleased. I've ridden in a 500+whp skyline and it was just too much. (Is there such a thing?)

I want a 12 sec. car on street tires (12.8-12.9@sea level). But most importantly, I just want to be able to beat a stock C5.

Again, I was content with around 300- I do not want to spend $8k-10K on this

320-340rwhp would be great! Just looking for the best way to get it! Best less than $8000!!!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 09:47 AM
  #9  
C5DEMON's Avatar
C5DEMON
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

DLin05.. Auburn AL?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 09:52 AM
  #10  
DLin05's Avatar
DLin05
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

correct and WAR EAGLE...let me know if you have any question about the HKS and Ill do my best to answer.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 10:12 AM
  #11  
C5DEMON's Avatar
C5DEMON
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

Hell yea! War Eagle! Graduated in 02. Where did you go to install and how is the power band?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 10:15 AM
  #12  
royce so's Avatar
royce so
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: asdf
Default

you don't really NEED forged internals, but the 320-340rwhp would be about the max power you'll be safe at with stock bottom end. anything more would be pushing it.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 11:41 AM
  #13  
DLin05's Avatar
DLin05
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

I got my kit installed at Z1 Motorsports in Carrollton, Ga. Pulls all the way to redline and the response is crisp.

Here is the link for my dyno along with test pipes and plenum. The lean AFR is due to the latter 2 mods.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #14  
chops's Avatar
chops
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

I got my Vortech installed at Z1 motorsports also.

1800 miles later with 8lb pully, I'm still on the stock belt, with stock ECU and hit 9.2lbs boost the other day when it was cold as a witches tit!

I usually can hit about 7.7-8.4 when she's warmed up all the way.

Oh yeah, she will take a stock C5!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 06:07 PM
  #15  
webcarconnection's Avatar
webcarconnection
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Hmm I have several friends that have F/I with stock boost and some other mods and haven't blow any engines or anything... what is the basis to say that 340 rwhp is the top to stock botton end... even in this forum are people pushing almoust 400 rwhp with stock internals for a year now and have NO blown engines at all. ???
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #16  
MMC Racing's Avatar
MMC Racing
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: Chula Vista, CA
Default

Originally posted by C5DEMON


Again, I was content with around 300- I do not want to spend $8k-10K on this

320-340rwhp would be great! Just looking for the best way to get it! Best less than $8000!!!
Spray it.. 50 shot with a progressive controller.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 06:48 PM
  #17  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally posted by webcarconnection
Hmm I have several friends that have F/I with stock boost and some other mods and haven't blow any engines or anything... what is the basis to say that 340 rwhp is the top to stock botton end... even in this forum are people pushing almoust 400 rwhp with stock internals for a year now and have NO blown engines at all. ???
you hit it on the head...there is no basis...or threshold that results in blown motors. I've seen VERY well tuned cars with full return fuel system..blablabla...J&S Safeguard...etc...and they still blew. There are just too many variables to have a PERFECT car..and so sometimes...they break. Anyware from stock whp to 430whp. Remember the posts about the N/A's that were burning tons of oil and the motor had to be replaced??

Any time you add F/I...you increase risk...that is an indisputable fact of nature...no free lunches.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 05:13 AM
  #18  
redline tt's Avatar
redline tt
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

very true
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #19  
Speedracer's Avatar
Speedracer
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 1
From: West Springfield, MA
Default Re: Started NA..wanting ~330rwhp..will I need internals for F/I?

Originally posted by C5DEMON
It seems there are more threads about building up the engine than actual F/I systems now. Is this because of the constant need for more power?

All I want is around 330rwhp.

What are my best options? I started NA, but it looks like I wouldn't be able to do much better than 270-280rwhp. I was considering stillen or vortech... also turbonetics single turbo.

What would be safest option? Besides the initial system, which will cost the most for extras to make it reliable? Will I need an internal build up with less than 350rwhp?

I read this section daily, but I'm still a little confused on the best route.

Thanks!
Go with the HKS supercharger. 327rwhp. Very safe on stock internals.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
sherm
Engine & Drivetrain
15
Apr 11, 2020 05:21 PM
3vilbunny
Exterior & Interior
24
Jul 18, 2017 05:10 PM
Dymsi
Exterior & Interior
14
Sep 29, 2015 11:32 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 PM.