Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Headers & S/C's Power Loss?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 12:03 AM
  #1  
Znitro's Avatar
Znitro
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default Headers & S/C's Power Loss?

I have been doing my homework on this one,

It seems that we SC'ers may lose power with the addition of headers due to the loss of back pressure and overlap of our stock cam design.

I have my stock headers off and they are very restrictive, 1.6-1.7in
collector!! Can you say tiny?

I bought DC headers and the collector is 2.25 plus a clean shot right out of the head instead of the stock "welded" header exhaust port.

Does anyone have any #'s for me on this or first hand experence?

Thanks,
ZNitro
Attached Thumbnails Headers & S/C's  Power Loss?-img_0447.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 04:41 AM
  #2  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 2
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

You will have to retune after install . You may lose boost but after retuning you may gain more power . I had my RT cats and headers on when I had the SC installed . And could only get 7lb's of boost . The RT's went bad , went to test pipes , then went to Crawford cats and gained back 1 1/2 lb's of boost . I lost power to . I then retuned and gained the power back that I had lost . Less boost always doesnt mean you lose power when you free up the air flow

Last edited by booger; Jan 10, 2005 at 04:43 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 06:38 AM
  #3  
jpc350z's Avatar
jpc350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: columbia md.
Default

Had the vortech installed last week at AAM and I have D.C. Headers on. It dynoe'd at 356HP after tuning the R4 S/W.The boost gauge jumps up to about 6psi but I'm not sure it is working properly. O'h also had the ECU Reflash.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #4  
JeffesonM's Avatar
JeffesonM
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Here is a before/after header dyno of a VQ30 with vortech blower at 12 psi on a maxima. The red line is before the headers, the blue line after. Only other changes were going from 2.25" exhaust to 2.5" exhaust.

Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 09:19 AM
  #5  
Znitro's Avatar
Znitro
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Thanks.

Your results are somewhat what I expected.

lower boost although gained power overall ...... Great!
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #6  
axxizzer's Avatar
axxizzer
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From: you'd Like to know
Default

I installed crawford headers and a TS reflash and gained 21WHP with my Stage3 Z, even though Stillen suggests against it, I made power!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 09:37 AM
  #7  
weslutes's Avatar
weslutes
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 539
Likes: 1
From: huntington beach CA
Default

Lower boost is less stress inside right?
I wonder why Stillen is against the headers.Same power, lower boost sounds good to me.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 12:42 PM
  #8  
zbicklin's Avatar
zbicklin
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore,MD
Default

Originally posted by jpc350z
Had the vortech installed last week at AAM and I have D.C. Headers on. It dynoe'd at 356HP after tuning the R4 S/W.The boost gauge jumps up to about 6psi but I'm not sure it is working properly. O'h also had the ECU Reflash.
Hey John,

I thought you dynoed at 396whp from your PM last week? I was really psyched for you. I got 357whp with the stock pulley so 356whp is pretty darn good for 6psi. I've seen 10.2lb on my boost gauge a couple times with my 9lb pulley. I'd like to get headers to free up some back pressure ans keep my boost down...

Steve
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 02:25 PM
  #9  
teh215's Avatar
teh215
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,753
Likes: 4
From: Charlottesville, Virginia
Default

Originally posted by axxizzer
I installed crawford headers and a TS reflash and gained 21WHP with my Stage3 Z, even though Stillen suggests against it, I made power!
What did the A/F ratios look like?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #10  
teh215's Avatar
teh215
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,753
Likes: 4
From: Charlottesville, Virginia
Default

Originally posted by weslutes
Lower boost is less stress inside right?
Interesting question. I am going to make a guess to say no, it does not. While the pressure in the intake tract may be lower as read by the boost gauge, I would think that cylinder pressure would be just as high. The more open exhaust just allows all of the burnt A/F mixture to escape more easily and makes it easier for the SC/Turbo to refill the cylinders thus, a lower boost pressure. The same volume of air, I would think, is still being compressed in the cylinder. The cylinder should contain a cleaner, unburnt AF charge though.

Thoughts?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 07:58 PM
  #11  
JeffesonM's Avatar
JeffesonM
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally posted by weslutes
Lower boost is less stress inside right?
I wonder why Stillen is against the headers.Same power, lower boost sounds good to me.
what do they use for fuel/timing? maybe headers would cause it to run lean?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 04:06 AM
  #12  
jpc350z's Avatar
jpc350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: columbia md.
Default

Correction. Sorry Steve the car did Dyno at 396HP don't know where the 356 came from..Although I would of also of been happy with 356..The question about less boost equating to less stress on the engine seems straight forward. Additional boost is multiplied by the compression ratio and amplified again in the combustion cycle.The end result is less compressive force on the piston/rod with lower boost..
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 04:15 AM
  #13  
zbicklin's Avatar
zbicklin
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore,MD
Default

Originally posted by jpc350z
Correction. Sorry Steve the car did Dyno at 396HP don't know where the 356 came from..Although I would of also of been happy with 356..The question about less boost equating to less stress on the engine seems straight forward. Additional boost is multiplied by the compression ratio and amplified again in the combustion cycle.The end result is less compressive force on the piston/rod with lower boost..
I agree... Lower backpressure with headers and exhaust simply allows exhaust gases to exit the engine easier and to an exstent on N/A applications allows for additional air to get sucked in the intake stroke. But the additional air coming in due to the loss of backpressure certainly wouldn't create the same cylinder pressure as a couple more pounds of boost.
Once I get my JWT clutch and Nismo Flywheel installed I'll be looking into headers.
Hope your enjoying you new found speed John!
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 06:10 AM
  #14  
2003z's Avatar
2003z
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally posted by JeffesonM
what do they use for fuel/timing? maybe headers would cause it to run lean?
test pipes made my stillen run lean.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
apex locator
Autocross/Road
10
Jul 23, 2021 02:27 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:17 AM.