Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Are stock rods suitable for FI VQ engines?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:18 AM
  #21  
jeffw's Avatar
jeffw
New Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

I've always wondered, is a "spun bearing" the same thing as a failed bearing, or is it a more specialized case of bearing failure?

And why is it called a spun bearing? If a bearing spins, then isn't it working correctly? Seems like seized bearing would be a better term.

--
Jeff
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:35 AM
  #22  
JCat's Avatar
JCat
---------------
Premier Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,996
Likes: 76
From: JC in Atlanta Georgia
Default

I have come across this very same problem on the Ford 351m and 400m engines.

The fix (in the Ford engine case) is to install an oil restrictor so that the heads and valve train do not get "all" the oil .... thereby insuring that the main bearings get enough.

Most racing engines do have baffling in their oil pans to insure against starvation. This is just common sense.


.........I think I'll go top-off my oil level now.......

Last edited by JCat; Mar 4, 2005 at 05:51 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:52 AM
  #23  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Peter,

The bearing in the picture had 36,000 miles on it. 13,000 of those miles were boosted.

Detonation is definatly a possibility in the wear of my upper bearing shells... but I have been somewhat ruling it out for 2 reasons... I thought the length of the wear looked more like a friction problem (I could be wrong), and I also thought that if I was experiencing enough detonation to hurt my bearings... I surely would have broken something in all that beating? On my spark plugs and pistons I have not seen any other signs to make me think it was detonation, but its always a possibility.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:54 AM
  #24  
palmerwmd's Avatar
palmerwmd
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
From: Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland
Default

Why dont we see more failures of Stock engines in autoX then?

Fred...??
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:56 AM
  #25  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

i suspect that at least half the engine failures are tuning related before any engineering "flaw" comes into play.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:59 AM
  #26  
westpak's Avatar
westpak
SFZCC
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2
From: Lake Worth, FL
Default

Originally posted by palmerwmd
Why dont we see more failures of Stock engines in autoX then?

Fred...??
Autox is not an extend operation, you get a run of one minute and then wait for a while so not a regular prolonged time. Although I did hear of one but it was probably due to over revving.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 06:17 AM
  #27  
xxlbeerZ's Avatar
xxlbeerZ
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

So if I end up going Vortech or something, should I still invest in an upgraded oil pan or pan spacer??
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 06:19 AM
  #28  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

This is a great discussion...couple additional things to keep in mind.

I drove my car hard for 14000 FI miles and my bearings were in virtually new condition. Second, if you look at most of the engine failures, they were NOT a result of high RPM operation, or even sustained boosted operation. People were snapping rods at 3500rpm just cruising around on the street. Going Deep's engine let go when he was just cruising along under normal loads.

Some time ago, Cheston went from a stock oil pan to aftermarket PE oilpan, and noticed a slighly drop in oil temps..roughly 10-15 degrees IIRC. And many of us have do repeated pulls on the freeway with oil temp gauges and dont notice a significant increase in oil temp.

Although oil starvation may have something to do with it, I am not conviced is is the sole cause of the failures. Almost always, a spun bearing is the result of sustained high g loads (such as on a road course), or excessive high RPM operation, or other oil starvation issues.

I am still leaning towards catastrophic timing (CAS shielded wire issue), and poor tuning as the main culprits. The stock rods, high compression, and high boost, are all very tough on the engine.

At the end of the day, there are several possible causes of engine failure, but its nearly impossible to nail down just one as the CAUSE of the failure.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 06:26 AM
  #29  
JonathanG35's Avatar
JonathanG35
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

subscribing
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 07:20 AM
  #30  
t32gzz's Avatar
t32gzz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally posted by gq_626
This is a great discussion...couple additional things to keep in mind.

I drove my car hard for 14000 FI miles and my bearings were in virtually new condition. Second, if you look at most of the engine failures, they were NOT a result of high RPM operation, or even sustained boosted operation. People were snapping rods at 3500rpm just cruising around on the street. Going Deep's engine let go when he was just cruising along under normal loads.

Some time ago, Cheston went from a stock oil pan to aftermarket PE oilpan, and noticed a slighly drop in oil temps..roughly 10-15 degrees IIRC. And many of us have do repeated pulls on the freeway with oil temp gauges and dont notice a significant increase in oil temp.

Although oil starvation may have something to do with it, I am not conviced is is the sole cause of the failures. Almost always, a spun bearing is the result of sustained high g loads (such as on a road course), or excessive high RPM operation, or other oil starvation issues.

I am still leaning towards catastrophic timing (CAS shielded wire issue), and poor tuning as the main culprits. The stock rods, high compression, and high boost, are all very tough on the engine.

At the end of the day, there are several possible causes of engine failure, but its nearly impossible to nail down just one as the CAUSE of the failure.
Sharif,
I know you added the APS oil pan to your Greddy. My question is, where are the pickup lines if you do this? Are they in a spacer? Are they in the very bottom of the pan like the Greddy? I already use the JWT oil pan spacer for the extra quart, but does the APS pan actually raise the level of the pickup lines?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 07:32 AM
  #31  
JCat's Avatar
JCat
---------------
Premier Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,996
Likes: 76
From: JC in Atlanta Georgia
Default

< Somebody start a group buy on the APS oil pan >
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 07:53 AM
  #32  
BrianLG35C's Avatar
BrianLG35C
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
From: NW Ohio
Default

Man, this really has me questioning forged internals. I'm thinking I'll wait until this becomes a little more clear.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:01 AM
  #33  
AdamDC's Avatar
AdamDC
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC
Default

Subscribing
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:33 AM
  #34  
foochdawg's Avatar
foochdawg
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

I am very interested in going single turbo and now moreso if I am POSITIVE that the stock internals can hold up to STOCK single turbo boost from either the Turbonetics kit or the APS kit. As of now I am leaning towards the APS just because of the things that they have found that could be issue with the car inm the long run. I like the way they manage fuel, cam and crank angle sensor, and now their oil pan.

I do have a question though. Will this oil pan be included in the single turbo setup? I see that there are two holes in the pan for the turbo return lines on the TT. But when you only have one return line... what happens with the other hole? Or will seperate pans be made or what?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:40 AM
  #35  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

You can easily plug the other hole with a bolt and washer....just like the oil drain.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:57 AM
  #36  
foochdawg's Avatar
foochdawg
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Is it threaded? Or am I going to have to pull out the ole tap and die kit lol
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #37  
BrianLG35C's Avatar
BrianLG35C
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
From: NW Ohio
Default

I understand from many other posts on other forums/threads from Peter/APS the oil pan will be included with the ST kit.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 09:12 AM
  #38  
going deep's Avatar
going deep
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 1
From: Nuclear Power
Default

Originally posted by foochdawg
Is it threaded? Or am I going to have to pull out the ole tap and die kit lol
Here some close up pics of the APS oil pan and the return oil line connections.







Here you can see the oil return line installed.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 09:13 AM
  #39  
foochdawg's Avatar
foochdawg
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Judging by the brass fitting I would assume that the holes ARE threaded?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 09:17 AM
  #40  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally posted by foochdawg
Judging by the brass fitting I would assume that the holes ARE threaded?
yes, they are threaded
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 AM.