Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Why is everyone with forged internals jumping to such low compression?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2005, 12:40 PM
  #1  
Speedracer
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Springfield, MA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Why is everyone with forged internals jumping to such low compression?

If there is some degree of safety even on the stock internals, why not just go with forged internals but maintain stock or near stock compression? Why has 8.5-8.6 become so popular instead of 9.5-9.6? You would certainly maintain much better off-boost response with the higher CR as well as less boosted power loss compared to stock on a given level of boost.
Old 05-19-2005, 12:52 PM
  #2  
1 2 NV
Registered User
 
1 2 NV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So they can run higher BOOOOOST!!
Old 05-19-2005, 12:52 PM
  #3  
Lorca@Z1
Registered User
 
Lorca@Z1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As much as I have been enjoying our car with APS and stock bottom end, I have considered the same thing although the biggest issue is room to grow. With lower compression pistons like 8.5/6 there is more headroom to make big power safely and a larger safety margin at lower power levels.

It sure is fun to drive at stock compression though ;-)
Old 05-19-2005, 12:56 PM
  #4  
azrael
Registered User
 
azrael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: austin
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They lower compression so they can run higher boost on pump gas.

Personally, 9:1 CR (maybe even 9.5:1) seems like an ideal combo, allowing you to hit ~600+ RWHP on pump gas with good off-boost power. I can't imagine running higher than 600 RWHP anyway. No matter what everyone thinks, there IS such a thing as too much power. Surface streets are NOT drag strips, and maintaining traction with that much power on tap is a tricky endeavor. Driving a car that can spin the rear wheels in every gear is not that much fun in the long run.

Just because you CAN doesn't mean you SHOULD.
Old 05-19-2005, 12:58 PM
  #5  
sentry65
the burninator
iTrader: (11)
 
sentry65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

just how much difference is there in driving experience between 8.5 and 10.3?

8.5 is supposed to be like less than 3% loss in power over 10.3

the main issue is there's more lag?

how much lag is there on a 8.5 CR setup?

is it huge are just barely noticably more than stock CR?



EDIT: just read phunk's post here:
https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/123407-rods-or-pistons.html

just as I thought, not a massive difference in lag

having 3.5 liters I think is really helping us to not have so much lag regardless of CR

Last edited by sentry65; 05-19-2005 at 01:20 PM.
Old 05-19-2005, 01:27 PM
  #6  
barthelb
Master
 
barthelb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anything over 500rwhp in our car might be just too much. But I don't know, im not there yet. Maybe if the torque curve is moved 500 might be as manageable as 450?
Old 05-19-2005, 02:40 PM
  #7  
Speedracer
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Springfield, MA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So.....where might I get forged pistons in the 9.3-9.6 CR range? How much?
Old 05-19-2005, 03:10 PM
  #8  
weslutes
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
weslutes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: huntington beach CA
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I dont plan on running 600+ hp, maybe 350-400 + a 75 shot should be plenty but not near 600. I just received my CP 10:1 pistons the other day. They should be good enough for what I'm doing.
I believe smogging the car may be an issue if you lower the compression drastically but the law(CA) was moved to 6 years for the first check. Still...
I guess everybody else all ready accepted the risk of driving a car that is illegal(smog) by installing their SC/TT/ST, so who cares about compression. When/if you sell your car, you may have to take all the stuff off if you can't find a shop that will make you pass for a few extra bucks.
I plan on having my car for a long time and being able to smog no problem.
Old 05-19-2005, 03:22 PM
  #9  
GurgenPB
UltimateSleeper
iTrader: (2)
 
GurgenPB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by azrael
They lower compression so they can run higher boost on pump gas.

Personally, 9:1 CR (maybe even 9.5:1) seems like an ideal combo, allowing you to hit ~600+ RWHP on pump gas with good off-boost power. I can't imagine running higher than 600 RWHP anyway. No matter what everyone thinks, there IS such a thing as too much power. Surface streets are NOT drag strips, and maintaining traction with that much power on tap is a tricky endeavor. Driving a car that can spin the rear wheels in every gear is not that much fun in the long run.

Just because you CAN doesn't mean you SHOULD.
My sentiments exactly, that's why I went with a "calculated" (lol) CR ration of 9.3:1.
Old 05-19-2005, 03:39 PM
  #10  
Speedracer
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Springfield, MA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by weslutes
I dont plan on running 600+ hp, maybe 350-400 + a 75 shot should be plenty but not near 600. I just received my CP 10:1 pistons the other day. They should be good enough for what I'm doing.
I believe smogging the car may be an issue if you lower the compression drastically but the law(CA) was moved to 6 years for the first check. Still...
I guess everybody else all ready accepted the risk of driving a car that is illegal(smog) by installing their SC/TT/ST, so who cares about compression. When/if you sell your car, you may have to take all the stuff off if you can't find a shop that will make you pass for a few extra bucks.
I plan on having my car for a long time and being able to smog no problem.
Passing emissions is one of my biggest hesitancies in going this route. Of course here in Massachusetts, it is now a simple OBD check test, so as long as the OBD system checks out I'm good to go.
Old 05-19-2005, 04:35 PM
  #11  
35ounces
03 CS Track 6MT
iTrader: (5)
 
35ounces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

speedracer you are considering going FI again?
Old 05-19-2005, 05:52 PM
  #12  
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
G3po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nor Cal.
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GurgenPB
My sentiments exactly, that's why I went with a "calculated" (lol) CR ration of 9.3:1.
Hmm I calculated 9.003:1 as the optimum on 91 octane.
Old 05-19-2005, 05:54 PM
  #13  
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
G3po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nor Cal.
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedracer
So.....where might I get forged pistons in the 9.3-9.6 CR range? How much?
For example , Arias will make any custom CR you want.I had them make me 9:1 with a custom spec crown design.
Check out forgedinternals.com.
Old 05-19-2005, 06:34 PM
  #14  
Dirty Dave
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Dirty Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: B - low
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After blowing my motor the other day i wouldnt even hesitate to go with real lo compression just to stay on the safe side. I've heard that there isnt a real noticable difference from 8.5 to 9 anyways.
Old 05-19-2005, 06:57 PM
  #15  
Speedracer
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Springfield, MA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE=35ounces]speedracer you are considering going FI again?[/QUOTE

Yeah, I am considering it again......this week. After owning a high power vehicle, no matter how much I try to convince myself that my Z is fine the way it is, or that I could just do a nice moderate NA build-up, I just can't get over the fact there are many faster cars out there. The Z just looks faster than it actually is and I just want it to have all the "go" to match the "show". That acceleration is SOOOOOOO addicting. I try to convince myself that I really shouldn't do this, but it keeps haunting me and haunting me. It's not even an issue of can I afford it. It is a question of should I spend the money. In fact, I wish I couldn't afford it because then it would be an easy decision. I'm so confused, and that is why I keep jumping from one idea and philosophy to another. Even my wife gave me the go ahead, and that makes it even harder. I wish she had just said no!!!!!!!

Last edited by Speedracer; 05-19-2005 at 07:00 PM.
Old 05-19-2005, 07:37 PM
  #16  
captj3
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
captj3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boynton Bch FL
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Go for it.She may never give you the opportunity again...lol
[QUOTE=Speedracer]
Originally Posted by 35ounces
speedracer you are considering going FI again?[/QUOTE

Yeah, I am considering it again......this week. After owning a high power vehicle, no matter how much I try to convince myself that my Z is fine the way it is, or that I could just do a nice moderate NA build-up, I just can't get over the fact there are many faster cars out there. The Z just looks faster than it actually is and I just want it to have all the "go" to match the "show". That acceleration is SOOOOOOO addicting. I try to convince myself that I really shouldn't do this, but it keeps haunting me and haunting me. It's not even an issue of can I afford it. It is a question of should I spend the money. In fact, I wish I couldn't afford it because then it would be an easy decision. I'm so confused, and that is why I keep jumping from one idea and philosophy to another. Even my wife gave me the go ahead, and that makes it even harder. I wish she had just said no!!!!!!!
Old 05-19-2005, 08:43 PM
  #17  
GurgenPB
UltimateSleeper
iTrader: (2)
 
GurgenPB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by G3po
Hmm I calculated 9.003:1 as the optimum on 91 octane.
Can you tell me how exactly did you do this? I am pretty curious. When I said I calculated, I really did not calculate per se, only took a very educated guess. I am planning to be runnign more than 91 octane when I push the engine to the max (over 550whp if I ever get there)... so effectively, 9.3 or even 9.5:1 is not a bad idea if you plan to run high octane gas at the track...which many many do.
Old 05-19-2005, 11:20 PM
  #18  
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Lower compression ratio lowers the detonation threshold, allowing you to run more boost.

Given a certain situation, two exact same cars, same turbo kit on each car, one with a 10:1 CR and one with a 8.0:1 CR, both are running the same PSI. The one with the higher CR will make more power. The higher the compression the more detonation threshold (less boost to achieve the same power, however, cannot boost past a certain PSI that a lower CR piston could allow you to boost to), the lower the compression ratio, the less detonation threshold (more boost to achieve the same power or more).
Old 05-19-2005, 11:24 PM
  #19  
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
G3po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nor Cal.
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GurgenPB
Can you tell me how exactly did you do this? I am pretty curious. When I said I calculated, I really did not calculate per se, only took a very educated guess. I am planning to be runnign more than 91 octane when I push the engine to the max (over 550whp if I ever get there)... so effectively, 9.3 or even 9.5:1 is not a bad idea if you plan to run high octane gas at the track...which many many do.
I was yoking, I just went with 9:1 , not too low , not too high. The actual crown design has more to do with anti-detonation characteristics than the actual static CR +- .5 point. You could make a flat top 8.5 piston with less knock tolerance than a well designed 9.5. Ideally you need to pay attention to the combustion chamber design just as a modern OEM FI would. A simple dish is "OK" but not usually optimized. The reason a simple dish is often used is because it takes less time on the CNC machine, not because it is optimally matched to the combustion chamber of choice. The crown and chamber ideally act together to raise the knock tolerance, which is basically the main concern in addition to light weight and strength. Also lowering the top ring does alot to improve land strength; however , at a slight penalty of higher emissions.

Last edited by G3po; 05-19-2005 at 11:26 PM.
Old 05-20-2005, 04:14 AM
  #20  
35ounces
03 CS Track 6MT
iTrader: (5)
 
35ounces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Speedracer]
Originally Posted by 35ounces
speedracer you are considering going FI again?[/QUOTE

Yeah, I am considering it again......this week. After owning a high power vehicle, no matter how much I try to convince myself that my Z is fine the way it is, or that I could just do a nice moderate NA build-up, I just can't get over the fact there are many faster cars out there. The Z just looks faster than it actually is and I just want it to have all the "go" to match the "show". That acceleration is SOOOOOOO addicting. I try to convince myself that I really shouldn't do this, but it keeps haunting me and haunting me. It's not even an issue of can I afford it. It is a question of should I spend the money. In fact, I wish I couldn't afford it because then it would be an easy decision. I'm so confused, and that is why I keep jumping from one idea and philosophy to another. Even my wife gave me the go ahead, and that makes it even harder. I wish she had just said no!!!!!!!
LOL, I wasnt buying that thread of yours about the car being more fun stock than boosted.
I hear ya though. I'm trying to decide what to do too.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350Z_Al
Exterior & Interior
133
10-29-2020 07:44 PM
MicVelo
NorCal Marketplace
9
10-04-2015 07:55 PM
Detailed Image
Cleaning & Detailing
0
09-28-2015 03:03 AM



Quick Reply: Why is everyone with forged internals jumping to such low compression?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:54 AM.