Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

before and after thoughts on turbos installed please!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 10:49 PM
  #1  
xxbetafrabaxx's Avatar
xxbetafrabaxx
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: deleted
Default before and after thoughts on turbos installed please!

can anyone hear please tell me what u think of the power and acceleration difference in the twin turbos. i mean stock to turbo. how much faster does the car feel? thanks
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #2  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

before------- woo hoooooo

after-------- holy sh********************T

Last edited by Mike Wazowski; Jan 6, 2006 at 10:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 11:05 PM
  #3  
calimarc's Avatar
calimarc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default

I really do have a new car. My car's performance now matchs my car's looks. I always thought my car looked faster than it was stock Hope that makes sense.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 11:09 PM
  #4  
xxbetafrabaxx's Avatar
xxbetafrabaxx
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: deleted
Default

so do u guys recommend aps tt or greddy tt???
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 11:11 PM
  #5  
Zilvia's Avatar
Zilvia
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 0
From: Lima, Ohio
Default

aps TT
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 11:18 PM
  #6  
xxbetafrabaxx's Avatar
xxbetafrabaxx
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: deleted
Default

why the aps tt????
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 12:30 AM
  #7  
Ant830's Avatar
Ant830
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: walnut
Default

Kuz it's more complete.......but if you want to eventually bulid the bottom end and run a lot more boost I'd suggest the Greddy. I personally have the Greddy b/c it was 1. cheaper and 2. Runs less boost, which = less stress...Everyone is deffinately going to recommend the APS because it puts down more power stock than the greddy (but runs more boost) With the greddy you need at least a fuel pump and a BOV to run it decently safe.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 12:43 AM
  #8  
Zilvia's Avatar
Zilvia
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 0
From: Lima, Ohio
Default

Its more complete out of box...but you can build up a greddy to the same completion specs for about the same price.......i say APS because ihave rode in a APS TTz but no Greddy zs......

i dont think it matters...both of the kick *** both show great gains.........but i just like APS better.........
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 01:01 AM
  #9  
FatBoy1's Avatar
FatBoy1
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

I'm watching the JWT...
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #10  
Fairlady_z33's Avatar
Fairlady_z33
Registered User
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

Well i have a greddy from stock to now its a diffeence no doubt and i only have it on out of the box no tuning and no other mods which the turbo's are at 5 pounds.

Now both kits are great

If you want to put it on and forget about it go with APS if you want to build more power go with greddy.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 05:14 AM
  #11  
roncfpz's Avatar
roncfpz
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 1
From: Orlando
Default

+1......really no other way to describe.

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
before------- woo hoooooo

after-------- holy sh********************T
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 05:27 AM
  #12  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

Originally Posted by xxbetafrabaxx
so do u guys recommend aps tt or greddy tt???
Originally Posted by FatBoy1
I'm watching the JWT...
The JWT TT was my weapon of Choice as you can see by my sig lines. I have not looked back since.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 05:34 AM
  #13  
captj3's Avatar
captj3
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Bch FL
Default

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
before------- woo hoooooo

after-------- holy sh********************T
Perfect way to describe it. Fairlady don't you have a j&s safeguard as well? 2 things drive your car for a while and first get use to it (I read you other thread). Get aps tt kit it's complete out of the box. If your worried about to much boost you can have it tuned to the level the greddy is stock. But it's not necessary it is still very safe at 8.5 lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 05:46 AM
  #14  
captj3's Avatar
captj3
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Bch FL
Default

Originally Posted by Fairlady_z33
Well i have a greddy from stock to now its a diffeence no doubt and i only have it on out of the box no tuning and no other mods which the turbo's are at 5 pounds.

Now both kits are great

If you want to put it on and forget about it go with APS if you want to build more power go with greddy.
Do you think the aps isn't cabable of building power? Why? My kit with 9.5 lbs of boost and a very conservetive tune 11.0 - 10.7 a/f = 440 rwhp. Everyone on the forums talks alot s**t about power until you drive and realise what it really is. I gained 35 -40 hp with the tune my car now is a tire shreading machine. I wonder how all these 500 + hp cars are daily driven? And in the wrong hands will kill someone.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 06:39 AM
  #15  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

Originally Posted by captj3
Do you think the aps isn't cabable of building power? Why? My kit with 9.5 lbs of boost and a very conservetive tune 11.0 - 10.7 a/f = 440 rwhp. Everyone on the forums talks alot s**t about power until you drive and realise what it really is. I gained 35 -40 hp with the tune my car now is a tire shreading machine. I wonder how all these 500 + hp cars are daily driven? And in the wrong hands will kill someone.
Exactly my thought.

Here is a quote I found interesting
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
The company might say it can provide 800 hp worth, but trust me, it cannot

All the kits are actually using turbos with approximately the same overal efficiency range
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #16  
Fairlady_z33's Avatar
Fairlady_z33
Registered User
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

Originally Posted by captj3
Do you think the aps isn't cabable of building power? Why? My kit with 9.5 lbs of boost and a very conservetive tune 11.0 - 10.7 a/f = 440 rwhp. Everyone on the forums talks alot s**t about power until you drive and realise what it really is. I gained 35 -40 hp with the tune my car now is a tire shreading machine. I wonder how all these 500 + hp cars are daily driven? And in the wrong hands will kill someone.
Hi i know that the APS can make power i have no doubt in that but i have seen both turbo's and the greddy is slightly bigger and has the option of later on upgrading the housing to a 20g which will create more power.

I have always thought the APS is a wonderful and very complete kit. I didnt get it becouse the fact that i was going to have to get a valve body so the tranny can take it. So it would have caused more money. And the fact that i was advised that later on it would make more power down the line.

Hey the APS has better turbo's becouse they are water cooled and arent they ballbearing. My original Plans was to get the SFR kit but too much money.

I have nothing against the APS or any kit out their but thtas what i have heard.

O captj what was that you added to your car now to make it to that much power
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 07:05 AM
  #17  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by captj3
Do you think the aps isn't cabable of building power? Why?
Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
Exactly my thought.
please explain what you think hp is? out of box on a stock compression motor, you can acheive upwards of 550 whp with a tune. with upgrading the actuators, full system and ems I don't see why another 100 -150 whp is out of the question (obviously on a built block with cams)


Originally Posted by captj3
Everyone on the forums talks alot s**t about power until you drive and realise what it really is. I gained 35 -40 hp with the tune my car now is a tire shreading machine. I wonder how all these 500 + hp cars are daily driven? And in the wrong hands will kill someone.
you said it! people have NOOOOO idea the reality of these power levels. if you are 400+ whp, you have a car that is borderline unsafe for the road IMO.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 07:19 AM
  #18  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by Fairlady_z33
Hi i know that the APS can make power i have no doubt in that but i have seen both turbo's and the greddy is slightly bigger and has the option of later on upgrading the housing to a 20g which will create more power.

I have always thought the APS is a wonderful and very complete kit. I didnt get it becouse the fact that i was going to have to get a valve body so the tranny can take it. So it would have caused more money. And the fact that i was advised that later on it would make more power down the line.

Hey the APS has better turbo's becouse they are water cooled and arent they ballbearing. My original Plans was to get the SFR kit but too much money.
you do realize that the APS kit can be ran at 5-6 pounds of boost. Spring pressure is about 5 pounds or so. The tune just has out of box boost at about 8 pounds. You could have just not ran power to the boost solenoid and been at 5 pounds. Nothing on the APS kit warrants a valve body upgrade anymore than the greddy kit would.

on top of this, the APS would have been more complete out of box, has water cooling on top of the oil 'cooled' turbos are very good reasons to select the APS kit.

your're quote:
And the fact that i was advised that later on it would make more power down the line.
this point is null. APS has as much potential as you will need. You didn't want to spend money on a valve body, and you use the MAX hp potential as a reason to buy the greddy

I think the greddy is a fine kit, but those of us that actually buy a TT setup, there are maybe 1 out of 1000 of us that will be maxing out ANY kit. Be it the JWT, greddy, or APS.

You all want big HP. I think in terms of a drivable car, marluci7 is basically leading the pack:
Originally Posted by marluci7
I have been driving the car on 20 psi and dyno'd 636 rwhp... A few weeks ago i brought the car back at the shop for some more work to be done... Some other internal work will be done to the engine and the boost will be going to 25 psi.... should be over 700 rwhp...
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 07:23 AM
  #19  
StarcraftBW's Avatar
StarcraftBW
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Default

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
before------- woo hoooooo

after-------- holy sh********************T
OMG hilarious pix hahaha
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 07:30 AM
  #20  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by xxbetafrabaxx
can anyone hear please tell me what u think of the power and acceleration difference in the twin turbos. i mean stock to turbo. how much faster does the car feel? thanks
I have driven both the TT and ST setups. Either one you go with will be well beyond what you expect.

That one thing is a given, regardless of what kit you choose.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:37 PM.