Turbonator?
06-23-2006, 02:56 PM
#21
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bradenton/Sarasota
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it would simply amaze me if some newbie actually thought to read around for info on these pieces of crap before posting....especially when a car has been on the market for 3+ years.
06-23-2006, 03:42 PM
#23
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bradenton/Sarasota
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i guess everyone thinks horsepower is super cheap. Hence why a 500hp viper costs 85 grand, or a 500hp vette is 65 grand. Oh, let's buy a 280hp Z and spend $50 on a turbonator for 100hp!
06-23-2006, 03:46 PM
#24
one time I shoved a dead bird all the way into the intake and dynoed. I gained 38whp but the power gradually started going down over time as the feathers were sucked into the engine and vaporized. People would always comment that my car smelled like cooked chicken. That was pretty sweet. Don't ask what else I've shoved up my intake or how I did it. That's personal.
But really I'd like to shove that piece of plastic called the turbonator into my intake and experience the VORTEX OF POWA. I'm sure it's just as awesome as the time I converted my RWD car to a NWD (none wheel drive) and told people I'd just sit there and instead of driving to places I'd just let the world come to me because the awesomeness was too much to ignore
But really I'd like to shove that piece of plastic called the turbonator into my intake and experience the VORTEX OF POWA. I'm sure it's just as awesome as the time I converted my RWD car to a NWD (none wheel drive) and told people I'd just sit there and instead of driving to places I'd just let the world come to me because the awesomeness was too much to ignore
06-23-2006, 03:51 PM
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sentry65
one time I shoved a dead bird all the way into the intake and dynoed. I gained 38whp but the power gradually started going down over time as the feathers were sucked into the engine and vaporized. People would always comment that my car smelled like cooked chicken. That was pretty sweet. Don't ask what else I've shoved up my intake or how I did it. That's personal.
But really I'd like to shove that piece of plastic called the turbonator into my intake and experience the VORTEX OF POWA. I'm sure it's just as awesome as the time I converted my RWD car to a NWD (none wheel drive) and told people I'd just sit there and instead of driving to places I'd just let the world come to me because the awesomeness was too much to ignore
But really I'd like to shove that piece of plastic called the turbonator into my intake and experience the VORTEX OF POWA. I'm sure it's just as awesome as the time I converted my RWD car to a NWD (none wheel drive) and told people I'd just sit there and instead of driving to places I'd just let the world come to me because the awesomeness was too much to ignore
Satire never gets old.
inbeforeHraesvelg:
06-24-2006, 03:17 AM
#27
guys i really dont know what kinda dynos you are getting all these horsepower figures on.
in all seriousness, dont listen to these guys, they are only good for 10 hp for each one you buy and you can only run up to 3 in one car.
50 hp, 100 hp, 150+ those guys are just picking on you...
in all seriousness, dont listen to these guys, they are only good for 10 hp for each one you buy and you can only run up to 3 in one car.
50 hp, 100 hp, 150+ those guys are just picking on you...
Last edited by Audible Mayhem; 06-24-2006 at 03:31 AM.
06-24-2006, 08:38 AM
#28
Originally Posted by sentry65
one time I shoved a dead bird all the way into the intake and dynoed. I gained 38whp but the power gradually started going down over time as the feathers were sucked into the engine and vaporized. People would always comment that my car smelled like cooked chicken. That was pretty sweet. Don't ask what else I've shoved up my intake or how I did it. That's personal.
But really I'd like to shove that piece of plastic called the turbonator into my intake and experience the VORTEX OF POWA. I'm sure it's just as awesome as the time I converted my RWD car to a NWD (none wheel drive) and told people I'd just sit there and instead of driving to places I'd just let the world come to me because the awesomeness was too much to ignore
But really I'd like to shove that piece of plastic called the turbonator into my intake and experience the VORTEX OF POWA. I'm sure it's just as awesome as the time I converted my RWD car to a NWD (none wheel drive) and told people I'd just sit there and instead of driving to places I'd just let the world come to me because the awesomeness was too much to ignore
thats great!!
06-25-2006, 08:32 AM
#29
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
these turbonator guys have got to be kidding... in their website, they have a HP calculator, and from adding 3 turbonators i can get up to 395 HP!!! Count me in!!! lol
07-01-2006, 02:06 AM
#30
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When you disrupt laminar airflow, the flow profile becomes turbulent (Reynolds number exceeds 2000). Turbulent flow causes a higher pressure drop (read LOSS) than laminar flow. Holding a garden hose vertically with low water pressure (like when getting a drink), the water profile is conical. That is because the velocities are greater at the center of the flow with decreasing layers of shear as you go from the center to the wall (where there is a theoretical zero velocity). That is an efficient profile. The same thing happens with air in a conduit. It flows faster and more efficiently around bends when it is laminar. Selling the concept of adding restrictions for the purpose of inducing turbulence (confused, inefficient state of flow)makes as much engineering sense as trying to nail jello to a wall.
07-01-2006, 03:57 AM
#31
Originally Posted by Omsin
When you disrupt laminar airflow, the flow profile becomes turbulent (Reynolds number exceeds 2000). Turbulent flow causes a higher pressure drop (read LOSS) than laminar flow. Holding a garden hose vertically with low water pressure (like when getting a drink), the water profile is conical. That is because the velocities are greater at the center of the flow with decreasing layers of shear as you go from the center to the wall (where there is a theoretical zero velocity). That is an efficient profile. The same thing happens with air in a conduit. It flows faster and more efficiently around bends when it is laminar. Selling the concept of adding restrictions for the purpose of inducing turbulence (confused, inefficient state of flow)makes as much engineering sense as trying to nail jello to a wall.
07-02-2006, 03:20 PM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Omsin
adding restrictions for the purpose of inducing turbulence (confused, inefficient state of flow)makes as much engineering sense as trying to nail jello to a wall.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JETPILOT
Forced Induction
16
01-25-2006 06:02 AM
