Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Recommended max boost on greddy tt w/out fuel sys

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 02:28 PM
  #1  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default Recommended max boost on greddy tt w/out fuel sys

I'm toying with the thought of upping the boost 2psi. I'm currently seeing 6.6, but am considering upping it to 8.5psi. With just the OEM fuel sys w/ the RC440's and a Walboro 255 lph fp, can I run 8.5psi with a relative margin of fuel system safety in terms of not having a return fuel system w/ a fpr??
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #2  
G352NV's Avatar
G352NV
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 0
From: Sac
Default

What EM do you have? If its the one that comes with the kit I wouldnt touch it!
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 09:04 PM
  #3  
Fairlady_z33's Avatar
Fairlady_z33
Registered User
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

8 no more i say to be on the safe side
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 09:38 PM
  #4  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

you WILL go lean as hell.

heres the process i went thru a few years ago. mods were just greddy kit, borla duals, kinetix test pipes. thats it. Oh yea, a JWT Clutch and flywheel.

i only ran the car on 100 octane. It ran clean and perfect (aside from rich in boost). Honestly the stock ignition timing is a tad aggressive for 93, but perfect for 100 octane and like 5.5psi or so. it was great, and withstood abuse. The car ran rich off the scale and made 347rwhp. i tried 6 - 6.5 psi... but it would get way too lean on top. This is still with base greddy map, didnt change a thing.

Then I added just the walbro. I was able to run 6.5psi and it would JUST start to go lean at redline. It would hit 12:1 A/F just at redline, which I was ok with since I was on 100 octane. The car made 398rwhp like that. It climbed a ton because the A/F wasnt rich off the scale anymore, so the extra boost SOMEWHAT evened out the tune. Any more boost at all (even .5psi), and it would go too lean and a lot sooner.

Next, I added JUST the return fuel system. I cranked up the fuel pressure a little. STILL on NO timing harness, but still 100 octane. I did a little tuning in the E-Manage on the top end. MINOR adjustment, didnt even touch the midrange where it was rich as hell, just added some fuel on the top end. i was able to run 7-7.3 or some crap psi, and the car made 416 rwhp. When it pulled out of rich off the scale at 5500rpm, it would hit 11.5:1 by redline (6500rpm).

Thats how it was when I raced those Supras in that old *** video that made it allllll over the web. The car also ran a 12.1 in the 1/4 like this, and im a pretty crummy drag racer. I am sure if Alberto or Brian drove it, it would have been 11's already. I was trapping 116 IIRC.

Thats how the car stayed, until I added the FCON, swapped out to CJM return kit, added HKS1000cc injectors, tuned to 467rwhp at 9psi with no other changes until I built the engine.

Last edited by phunk; Oct 17, 2006 at 09:43 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 06:14 AM
  #5  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
you WILL go lean as hell.


Then I added just the walbro. I was able to run 6.5psi and it would JUST start to go lean at redline. It would hit 12:1 A/F just at redline,

.
+1

Personally, I would not attempt to raise the boost at all on the Greddy TT kit...even with a Walbro. enjoy it as is...then get a return fuel system, something better for tuning (UTEC or FCON), and they you can safely raise your boost and power levels.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 07:03 AM
  #6  
dutchboy's Avatar
dutchboy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Holland,MI
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
+1

Personally, I would not attempt to raise the boost at all on the Greddy TT kit...even with a Walbro. enjoy it as is...then get a return fuel system, something better for tuning (UTEC or FCON), and they you can safely raise your boost and power levels.
Sharif- Is the Emanage very safe for the stock boost levels? I've heard alot of negatives about it lately.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 07:39 AM
  #7  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

I've got the UTEC, thanks for the advice guys! Looks like it's wiser to end up getting the return fuel sys and picking up some 550's before bothering upping the boost.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 05:03 PM
  #8  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by dutchboy
Sharif- Is the Emanage very safe for the stock boost levels? I've heard alot of negatives about it lately.
I dont like the eManage blue at all, and the EU is a little bit better. But best bet is the UTEC for stock'ish boost levels.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #9  
IslandZavage's Avatar
IslandZavage
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: South FLA
Default

what about with UTEC/ Walbro pump/440 injectors/ CJmotorsport fuel return?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #10  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

just a quick update - we ended up running the car to around 9.5psi, and that's when the injector duty cycle got a lil too much. so it was dialed back to around 9psi, it's now putting out 452whp and 428wtq. Car is running really strong! Eventually the next mods will be getting away from the stock exhuast and going w/ 3" TD, bigger injectors and a return fuel system Car has the 440cc injectors and walboro 255 lph fp for now & UTEC for the brains.

Last edited by Juztin; Oct 28, 2006 at 08:36 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2006 | 08:48 PM
  #11  
tig488's Avatar
tig488
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 0
From: bama
Default

i can see into the future, your next thread isnt gonna be good.

JK, be careful with that setup!
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 01:25 AM
  #12  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

lol thanks tig, that's part of playing the game. if it goes it goes, if it doesn't its getting rebuilt anyway I'd definitely recommend going return fuel sys and bigger injectors anyway but its interesting to see what it can do with just a relatively stock fuel sys. the afr at 6600 rpm was 11.9 so I don't intend on upping the boost anymore. car was tuned and dyno'd on 91 octane.

Last edited by Juztin; Oct 29, 2006 at 01:29 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 03:13 AM
  #13  
silver nismo's Avatar
silver nismo
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: jeddah
Default

waw u r probably the strongest in this set up congrats but as u said u r playing the game and a verey dangi dong 1 hope ur engin last u long.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 08:45 AM
  #14  
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Mr_pharmD
Registered User
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 1
From: KaLi
Default

Originally Posted by IslandZavage
what about with UTEC/ Walbro pump/440 injectors/ CJmotorsport fuel return?

how much hp is this setup good for?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #15  
Nic@CiNcity's Avatar
Nic@CiNcity
Banned
iTrader: (93)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
From: Bis-Man, ND
Default

Originally Posted by IslandZavage
what about with UTEC/ Walbro pump/440 injectors/ CJmotorsport fuel return?
I'm installing these right now. Plus my tuner pro and oil/plen spacers.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #16  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
how much hp is this setup good for?

About 440whp at 90% duty cycle...depending on your fuel pressure.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #17  
IslandZavage's Avatar
IslandZavage
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: South FLA
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
About 440whp at 90% duty cycle...depending on your fuel pressure.

Is 90% duty cycle pushin it though?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #18  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by IslandZavage
Is 90% duty cycle pushin it though?
It is the max envelope I would push on a customer car. The newer RC injectors use a diferent orifice style, and are engineered to be safe at 90% duty cycle, vs. 80% for most others.

These are just general guidlines for the sake of this discussion. You can run slightly higher fuel pressure, which will result in even lower duty cycles.

Selected a proper injector size, involves some compromises, for a street driven car.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #19  
Juztin's Avatar
Juztin
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 29
From: Los Lunas, NM
Default

Next mods, CJM stage 1, RC 550's, 3" turbo back dump tubes dumping right by the SVRT wastegate dumps to eliminate the exhaust and provide no back pressure and tune to 10psi! Should be fun >:-)

Has anybody had any issues with startup/idle w/ 550cc injectors or will they scale fine w/ the UTEC?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #20  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Juztin, when you install the CJM fuel system, and hook up the vacuum line to the regulator, you will have a 1:1 fuel pressure ratio. So even if you set your base fuel pressure the same, at idle it will drop a lot due to engine vacuum. This will make it so little to no scaling is needed to idle the 550 over the 440 @ static pressure. However your fuel tuning curve will mostly likely need some reshaping overall.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:43 AM.