Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

out of the box...zero tuning...and safer... ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 07:11 AM
  #81  
gringott's Avatar
gringott
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 18
From: Kentucky
Default

Personally, I got a laugh out of the writeup on Turbonetics website for their 350Z kit, perhaps it needs updating? I thought APS was the king of hype, but Turbonetics is trying hard, see if you can spot the incorrect or disputable items. Check APS's website for a great description too, several paragraphs of saying nothing but hype, even the parts section uses words like huge. Maybe both companies need to take a deep breath and offer facts.

Turbonetics' Nissan 350Z turbo system is the first and only production single turbo system available. Utilizing our proprietary ceramic ball bearing turbocharger, this system outperforms all twin turbocharger kits currently on the market. The unique engineering design of this system retains factory exhaust manifolds, therefore reducing overall installation time significantly. Installation of the kit can be done easily with basic hand tools by a qualified auto mechanic.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 07:47 AM
  #82  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman

TN is bolting a turbo on your car. APS is a true conversion to FI.
so the skimmed on a few areas on their kit... APS is no angel either...

but that statment you made.. its kinda out there.. the quality is really not that much of a HUGE difference
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 07:58 AM
  #83  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
true statement

def
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #84  
JCstart's Avatar
JCstart
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Quebec, Canada
Default

Hey ! thanks to all for your great comments and feedback !

it is getting more clear for me now...

for what I'm looking for, I think APS will be a good choice...out of the box...

not because TN is not a good kit, but just because the APS out of the box kit is more reliable... no need to buy supplementary parts... take it out of the box, install it and pay your tickets...

like I said, both are great kit for sure !!! but for what I'm looking for, I think APS will be a good choice... with the APS ST exhaust system...

thanks to all again... I appreciated your patience..
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 08:21 AM
  #85  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

personally.. as i stated before.. i would go with the APS TT system.. and if you want an ST system go with TN ... i don't like the APS ST ... the boost drop.. the fact it needs an APS Exhaust to work properly...
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #86  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

yah...
i woudl take the JIC single anytime over the aps exahust
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #87  
azula's Avatar
azula
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Default

i have the aps st and the aps exhaust and i must say that i am completely satisfied, of course i cannot bash turbonetics because i have never had any experience with them. all i can say is that i have not experienced any problems, boost drop, noises....anything, i've put about 4k miles on it....however i don't drive hard, i only stomp on it when i feel the opponent is worthy.....lol. anyways, good luck on ur decision and i hope i helped. lata man...
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 09:29 AM
  #88  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by doug
so the skimmed on a few areas on their kit... APS is no angel either...

but that statment you made.. its kinda out there.. the quality is really not that much of a HUGE difference


IMO, the quality difference is noticable, but that was not what I was getting at. APS addresses all aspects of converting a N/A car to FI. They properly address the EMS, boost control, Fuel system, etc. They did not simply look at bolting on a turbo and getting by with the bare minimums and hoping for the best (done so IMO to hit a certain price point and mass market the heck out of it). If nothing more than looking at the dump pipe on the TN setup, you can see that APS is superior by design alone.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #89  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by doug
personally.. as i stated before.. i would go with the APS TT system.. and if you want an ST system go with TN ... i don't like the APS ST ... the boost drop.. the fact it needs an APS Exhaust to work properly...

I agree I would run the TT setup vs the single, but to say that because you wouldn't want to run a proper FI designed exhaust is just comical to me. You wouldn't want to buy a properly designed exhaust, but see no issue running a joke of reflash, no fuel return, having to tap your oil return, or running a space limited dump pipe due to, what I consider poor, design???
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 09:39 AM
  #90  
maximumsportZ's Avatar
maximumsportZ
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by doug
personally.. as i stated before.. i would go with the APS TT system.. and if you want an ST system go with TN ... i don't like the APS ST ... the boost drop.. the fact it needs an APS Exhaust to work properly...
You envy me thats all.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #91  
zman1910's Avatar
zman1910
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by doug
personally.. as i stated before.. i would go with the APS TT system.. and if you want an ST system go with TN ... i don't like the APS ST ... the boost drop.. the fact it needs an APS Exhaust to work properly...

The exhaust is what it is. It mates up properly, resolves any boost drop issues, and still sounds pretty nice. I don't see any real downside unless you just hate the sound of it. IMO its not terribly expensive either...right around where other exhaust prices are..

Either way a free flowing exhaust is encouraged in any FI kit
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 02:39 PM
  #92  
M3to350z's Avatar
M3to350z
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: los angeles
Default

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Nissa...QQcmdZViewItem

What do you guys think of this kit. I'm thinking of bidding but I don't want to purchase anything that will give me problems or have to purchase additional items.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 02:45 PM
  #93  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 2
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

there are several kit for sale in the classifieds here also . Just be careful and do some checking before buying a used kit
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 03:54 PM
  #94  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by zman1910
The exhaust is what it is. It mates up properly, resolves any boost drop issues, and still sounds pretty nice. I don't see any real downside unless you just hate the sound of it. IMO its not terribly expensive either...right around where other exhaust prices are..

Either way a free flowing exhaust is encouraged in any FI kit
I don't think the exhaust has anything to do with most people's tapering boost issues, but that's just me...
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #95  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by gringott
Personally, I got a laugh out of the writeup on Turbonetics website for their 350Z kit, perhaps it needs updating? I thought APS was the king of hype, but Turbonetics is trying hard, see if you can spot the incorrect or disputable items. Check APS's website for a great description too, several paragraphs of saying nothing but hype, even the parts section uses words like huge. Maybe both companies need to take a deep breath and offer facts.

Turbonetics' Nissan 350Z turbo system is the first and only production single turbo system available. Utilizing our proprietary ceramic ball bearing turbocharger, this system outperforms all twin turbocharger kits currently on the market. The unique engineering design of this system retains factory exhaust manifolds, therefore reducing overall installation time significantly. Installation of the kit can be done easily with basic hand tools by a qualified auto mechanic.
That was written 2 years ago when Turbonetics was the only single turbo system and out of box Greddy cars were making 350-360, APS was in the 370-380s as only the first batch had arrived, PE cars were in the 350s-370s. That was all that was out..
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #96  
Oleg's Avatar
Oleg
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
From: Room full of blood
Default

Oy vey...
Here we go again.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 04:28 PM
  #97  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
IMO, the quality difference is noticable, but that was not what I was getting at. APS addresses all aspects of converting a N/A car to FI. They properly address the EMS, boost control, Fuel system, etc. They did not simply look at bolting on a turbo and getting by with the bare minimums and hoping for the best (done so IMO to hit a certain price point and mass market the heck out of it). If nothing more than looking at the dump pipe on the TN setup, you can see that APS is superior by design alone.
Proper EMS? A 15 year old Unichip with DOS based tuning software? The fuel system is adequate at best. The dump pipe? Which pipe is that? The only thing Turbonetics "dumps" is the BOV to the atmosphere. APS design is superior? Turbo at the bottom of the car where even APS owners admit they scrape the housings on speed bumps. Boost drop unless you use their exhaust, faulty check valves, half@ss wastegate system unless you buy at an added cost their external wastegate pipes AND a Tial wastegate. Subpar customer service, an abysmal warranty system, do we need to go on?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 05:02 PM
  #98  
Oleg's Avatar
Oleg
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
From: Room full of blood
Default

This has gone beyond ridiculous at this point... I am not a fanboy of anything, in fact I do not even plan to FI my Z but this last statement is a bit out of line...

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Proper EMS? A 15 year old Unichip with DOS based tuning software??
As opposed to what, a non-tunable reflash?
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
The fuel system is adequate at best.
A rudimentary return system is worse the none at all?
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
The dump pipe? Which pipe is that? The only thing Turbonetics "dumps" is the BOV to the atmosphere. APS design is superior?
Turbo at the bottom of the car where even APS owners admit they scrape the housings on speed bumps.
Lowered cars scrape, I did not hear anything about stock riding height having issues, and as you know, I've considered every kit out there.
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Boost drop unless you use their exhaust, faulty check valves, half@ss wastegate system unless you buy at an added cost their external wastegate pipes AND a Tial wastegate.
The chack valve is replaced, Tial 38mm WG is $225 at SGP, any turbo kit benefits from an exhaust and $995 is competitive with others. Both kits will work out of the box, TN can benefit from third party accessories as well, such as a tunable ECU, fuel system (maybe a full fuel return would be an overkill for stock bottom end power levels), definately an oil pan upgrade...
Both kits have their own ups and down. Working out the inadequacies in either one will probably cost around same $$, so it really comes down to which system you're a fanboy of. Which basically is the source of this banter.
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Subpar customer service, an abysmal warranty system, do we need to go on?
That is the only TRUE advantage that you have mentioned so far.

P.S.
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Turbo at the bottom of the car where even APS owners admit they scrape the housings on speed bumps.
http://www.*ir*ower*ystems.com.au/35...urbo/turbo.htm

Scroll to the middle of the page.
The only owners who'd scrape their housings are the ones who forgot to install the impact sheild.
BTW, if I still do go FI, it will be a custom Greddy TT based setup done by MRC, so I am not biased to either company. And if the motor blows, it blows, I'll buy a built one.

Last edited by Oleg; Jan 6, 2007 at 05:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 05:07 PM
  #99  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Yeah, but really, shut up, especially if you don't own a Z.
Attached Thumbnails out of the box...zero tuning...and safer... ???-not_this_shit_again.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #100  
Oleg's Avatar
Oleg
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
From: Room full of blood
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
Yeah, but really, shut up, especially if you don't own a Z.
Actually I do own a Z. I finally test drove a GTO and was not as overwhelmed as I was by reading the specs in magazine. Too heavy, too much body roll, I didn't like the brakes (I have Brembo GT on my Z), etc.
Anyway, I kept the Z. This spring I am getting a valve body upgrade and a set of Greddy coilovers. After that, who knows...
And as I said, I am very much prepared finacially for a blown motor scenario and will not bother with any of the ST kits.

Last edited by Oleg; Jan 6, 2007 at 05:32 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:20 AM.