Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Best shop for Built Motor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 07:51 AM
  #41  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by 98sr20ve
Yep, but conventional wisdom says they don't last as long either.

ACTUALLY, you will be in much greater danger of oil starvation and spinning a bearing if you are revving higher/more heat/more power with tighter clearances...
notice in my explanation, my LAST point was "they will make a bit more power"... this is NOT the reason to run larger clearances, but engine longevity is...

we have seen several stock engines have spun bearings on several journals when they are finally opened up due to say, a piston failure...

to keep a forced inducted daily driven street car, that is going to be producing 2-3 times more power than intended from the factory, it is foolish to run stock clearances, spinning a bearing is more common than a engine "wearing out" prematurely from larger oil clearances

TODD
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 08:17 AM
  #42  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by 98sr20ve
It's not a fight. Don't try and turn it into one. I am simply asking why you would up the clearances on the engine for a street car.

especially since many are revving these engines higher than intended as well! lack of oil to critical areas due to tihght clearances is MUCH riskier..a worser evil...than larger clearances and risk of premature bearing wear (lesser evil)

Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #43  
Wicked4u2c's Avatar
Wicked4u2c
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: La Mirada
Default

If you want the "BEST" Motor build then go with a GTM Motor. I'm sure they have distributors that are local or close to you, like MRC or so? Sam at GTM has been racing and building engines way before most of us on this forum were even born. He has true racing experience and has millions of dollars of machinery that is precise to the tee. His quality control is hands down the most detailed I have ever seen. I could start a whole thread about this but you said you wanted the best right, nobody comes close.


::END OF THREAD::
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 09:13 AM
  #44  
Changvi's Avatar
Changvi
New Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere
Default

GTM for sure..
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 09:34 AM
  #45  
rocks's Avatar
rocks
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 2
From: hobbs nm
Default

I have over 10,000 miles on my engine from Built Z motors, and its running great. So i suggest built Z motors, i could be a little biased though.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 09:59 AM
  #46  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by rocks
I have over 10,000 miles on my engine from Built Z motors, and its running great. So i suggest built Z motors, i could be a little biased though.
yeah amazing its still alive since you put 87 Octane in it
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #47  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked4u2c
If you want the "BEST" Motor build then go with a GTM Motor. I'm sure they have distributors that are local or close to you, like MRC or so? Sam at GTM has been racing and building engines way before most of us on this forum were even born. He has true racing experience and has millions of dollars of machinery that is precise to the tee. His quality control is hands down the most detailed I have ever seen. I could start a whole thread about this but you said you wanted the best right, nobody comes close.


::END OF THREAD::
This thread was to discuss options across the board, turned into a good technical discussion...

I think most distributers have been using resources that have been in this industry for many many years, no question about it....anyone in or around the California area, without a doubt, go to GTM for the entire package, engine build, install , and tune, would be silly not to!!!

PS: Sam has not been racing before we were born, he was in 2nd grade when I was born , he's still a young vibrant entrepeneur!


-TODD
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:37 AM
  #48  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by doug
yeah amazing its still alive since you put 87 Octane in it

not running forced induction, lower CR pistons, 87 is fine.. the motor was built to remedy a freak stock rev up motor catastrophe, he wanted to be prepared for FI this coming year
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #49  
Wicked4u2c's Avatar
Wicked4u2c
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: La Mirada
Default

Originally Posted by 350zDCalb
Sam has not been racing before we were born, he was in 2nd grade when I was born , he's still a young vibrant entrepeneur!


-TODD
Like I said....

You Obviously haven't seen Sam's ultrasound images when he was in his mom's stomach?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRMYgpWTGic
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #50  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by 350zDCalb
not running forced induction, lower CR pistons, 87 is fine.. the motor was built to remedy a freak stock rev up motor catastrophe, he wanted to be prepared for FI this coming year
no its not fine.. sure it maybe ok for the motor that it won't detonate.. but you are messing with sensors and electronics that shouldn't be compensating for such low octane
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #51  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by doug
no its not fine.. sure it maybe ok for the motor that it won't detonate.. but you are messing with sensors and electronics that shouldn't be compensating for such low octane

it'll be fine...really...he's not running leaded fuel, you are funny...oooooh the sky is falling!!!! oooooh...


...not ideal, but i bet your bullocks to a barndance he'll be fine

Last edited by 350zDCalb; Mar 8, 2007 at 12:29 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #52  
rocks's Avatar
rocks
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 2
From: hobbs nm
Default

If i was in mexico running some 81 octane leaded fuel i would worry. But im not getting in a pissing match about octane vs compression. And doug if you understood and did some research on how the stock ecu works you can run 87 in a stock Z. I used 87 in a 3.5vq altima for 3 years, it never blew up. Your probably one of those people who would run 93 octane in a stock low compression car if you could because its "better for your engine" when all your doing is wasting money.

Last edited by rocks; Mar 8, 2007 at 01:37 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #53  
Wicked4u2c's Avatar
Wicked4u2c
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: La Mirada
Default

Originally Posted by 350zDCalb
not running forced induction, lower CR pistons, 87 is fine.. the motor was built to remedy a freak stock rev up motor catastrophe, he wanted to be prepared for FI this coming year

Even I know that you should never put 87 octane in a 350z (read the label on the fuel door) this is very bad coming from an engine builder (or should iI say Chiropractor)
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #54  
eat rice z33's Avatar
eat rice z33
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 2
From: ct
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
You could just bring it to me and ill do it. Just see how well my engine is coming along....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj-oRae-K6g

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #55  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked4u2c
Even I know that you should never put 87 octane in a 350z (read the label on the fuel door) this is very bad coming from an engine builder (or should iI say Chiropractor)
The reason it says to use premium is due to the high compression of the stock motor.

What happens when you lower the compression? That's right, the risk of detonation decreases.

::edit:: if you were joking or being sarcastic, disregard this post
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 02:06 PM
  #56  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by rocks
If i was in mexico running some 81 octane leaded fuel i would worry. But im not getting in a pissing match about octane vs compression. And doug if you understood and did some research on how the stock ecu works you can run 87 in a stock Z. I used 87 in a 3.5vq altima for 3 years, it never blew up. Your probably one of those people who would run 93 octane in a stock low compression car if you could because its "better for your engine" when all your doing is wasting money.
its not the 350z ECU that does that.. its nissans programming... the 2007 Maxima is recommended to run 87 Octane.. but nissan did that.. not you... anyway.. its your car.. i don't really give a ****
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 02:07 PM
  #57  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by failsafe306
The reason it says to use premium is due to the high compression of the stock motor.

What happens when you lower the compression? That's right, the risk of detonation decreases.

::edit:: if you were joking or being sarcastic, disregard this post
it has nothing to do with compression.. well it does.. but not entirely all about compression..

the 2007 Maxima has high compression.. and the manual/door says 87 octane..
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 02:09 PM
  #58  
rocks's Avatar
rocks
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 2
From: hobbs nm
Default

You do know the stock ECU has fuel and ignition maps for lower octane? Besides the label on my fuel door no longer applys, its not a factory engine, and i have a utec, datalog shows no knock.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #59  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by rocks
You do know the stock ECU has fuel and ignition maps for lower octane?
please tell me you switched your map
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #60  
Wicked4u2c's Avatar
Wicked4u2c
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: La Mirada
Default

Originally Posted by doug
it has nothing to do with compression.. well it does.. but not entirely all about compression..

the 2007 Maxima has high compression.. and the manual/door says 87 octane..

Exactly... to me its about being a "professional" engine builder. To say "Oh its low compression so there is room for error" Its like a dentist saying only brush your teeth once a day, sure you can get away with brushing once a day but the risks of cavity and other mouth diseases may arise. But again, this is what separates true professionals from amateurs.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 PM.