Procharger Supercharger coming out for the 350z!!!
#41
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Z350Maniac
To each their own. You're saying that people who mod the Z for a dragstrip are (basically) "fools"? That they're doing it "wrong"? Cause YOU conceive that the Z is meant ONLY for road course racing? YOU think that your opinion is the ONLY one?
To each their own. You're saying that people who mod the Z for a dragstrip are (basically) "fools"? That they're doing it "wrong"? Cause YOU conceive that the Z is meant ONLY for road course racing? YOU think that your opinion is the ONLY one?
I believe yours is ONE of the MANY opinions available to justify the reasons for modifying a Z. To each their own I say. I personally don't understand those "who spend their money to make their 350 look pretty" (<--- who are YOU to condescend others whose opinions/decisions differ from your own... "pretty"? ) BUT I still respect their decision to do so. I don't tell them they "are completely missing out"
You completely downplay the ENTIRE turbo theory. SURE pressure is directly proportionate to temp (all of us had highschool chemistry if I'm not mistaken) and with rising pressure, so rises temperature. But they still use turbos to make 13 second cars into 9-10 second cars (Lingenfelter, if I am not mistaken (before his tragic accident 8 months ago) piloted a 4 cylinder down the track to the tune of SEVEN SECONDS. Guess what he had under the hood guess how many records were broken that day )
Furthermore, I'd be willing to bet the stress on a turbo motor (even a factory turbo motor) would be less on the 1/4 than on a roadcourse. One 20 minute session on a roadcourse where you're either on full throttle or hard braking is far more stressful than a < 13 second run at the 1/4 given equal motors.
There are reasons why Nissan chose not to up the boost in the VG30DETT (to at least increase 300ZX sales), partly because of emissions, but more importantly Nissan would not be able to guarantee the reliability of the motor (i.e. it's no longer "bulletproof"). The VG30DETT is a de-tuned race engine and for the most part still over-built, but once you increase the power levels, it becomes less "over-built."
I'm not trying to flame ya or diss ya or whatever, I'm trying to open your eyes to the fact that although you may not agree with others opinions, but respect them none-the-less.
Michael.
Last edited by Michael-Dallas; 04-27-2003 at 02:43 PM.
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jason
You have yet to define stress, aside from running the engine in detonation condition.
You have yet to define stress, aside from running the engine in detonation condition.
Huh? Says who? Actually, off the dealership lot it's home is the STREET.
I already said that detonation will kill your engine, and I'm perfectly aware of what causes detonation. That doesn't mean however that a company can not produce a FI kit which does not cause detonation. It's important the company has sound engineering behind their product, and hopefully a good history.
Michael.
#43
SFZCC
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Michael-Dallas, but you just have gone down the frustrating road I mistakingly went down trying to just share some advice, not just from me but from performance guys who do turbo installs, these guys just don't want to listen to the possible realities that would come with FI.
They want proof of what we are saying yet they have no proof of what they are saying either, they say you get a warranty, wow, that will be useless since it only will cover the turbo and not your engine, if they give me a 3 year 36 month warranty on their turbo and the engine I will be the first in line to buy one, these guys don't realize that they will be the R&D, good luck with your 12 month warranty and read the fine print.
If any one them would do an HPDE they will be hooked as you said and will start to think tires/brakes/suspension plus driving skill and the last would be more power.
I hate to keep this going but wanted to acknowledge you.
They want proof of what we are saying yet they have no proof of what they are saying either, they say you get a warranty, wow, that will be useless since it only will cover the turbo and not your engine, if they give me a 3 year 36 month warranty on their turbo and the engine I will be the first in line to buy one, these guys don't realize that they will be the R&D, good luck with your 12 month warranty and read the fine print.
If any one them would do an HPDE they will be hooked as you said and will start to think tires/brakes/suspension plus driving skill and the last would be more power.
I hate to keep this going but wanted to acknowledge you.
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lakeview Point, MS
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Michael-Dallas
Please do not put words in my mouth. You can do whatever floats your boat, but I personally think there are cheaper and better means to go down the 1/4.
Who am I? I am the anti-BLING BLING. If you're going to make your 350 fast w/ mAd pOwAh and make it handle like a go-kart, then come out and play at an HPDE. Just leave the "it's too expensive or I can't afford it" excuses at home.
But, but, but you can't cheat physics, period. I'd hate to use Lingenfelter as an example (especially since I am acquainted w/ John and Kerri Page -- you know, Lingenfelter's daughter and son-in-law who also owns the yellow TT C5 that recently won the C&D Supercar Shootout), but how often do you think that Cavalier motor gets rebuilt? I can slap on a 500-shot of nitrous in the 350, go down the 1/4 fast (might take me a few tries to master the launch), but I guarantee you the VQ will grenade MUCH quicker w/ that abuse.
Furthermore, I'd be willing to bet the stress on a turbo motor (even a factory turbo motor) would be less on the 1/4 than on a roadcourse. One 20 minute session on a roadcourse where you're either on full throttle or hard braking is far more stressful than a < 13 second run at the 1/4 given equal motors.
There are reasons why Nissan chose not to up the boost in the VG30DETT (to at least increase 300ZX sales), partly because of emissions, but more importantly Nissan would not be able to guarantee the reliability of the motor (i.e. it's no longer "bulletproof"). The VG30DETT is a de-tuned race engine and for the most part still over-built, but once you increase the power levels, it becomes less "over-built."
No harm, no foul. I've got a thick skin and I can be the keyboard warrior (I can dish it out and I can take it in). Like I said, I went through the whole phase. I loved my 300, but I never enjoyed it for what it was worth. It's personally frustrating to see others go through the phase I went through.
Michael.
Please do not put words in my mouth. You can do whatever floats your boat, but I personally think there are cheaper and better means to go down the 1/4.
Who am I? I am the anti-BLING BLING. If you're going to make your 350 fast w/ mAd pOwAh and make it handle like a go-kart, then come out and play at an HPDE. Just leave the "it's too expensive or I can't afford it" excuses at home.
But, but, but you can't cheat physics, period. I'd hate to use Lingenfelter as an example (especially since I am acquainted w/ John and Kerri Page -- you know, Lingenfelter's daughter and son-in-law who also owns the yellow TT C5 that recently won the C&D Supercar Shootout), but how often do you think that Cavalier motor gets rebuilt? I can slap on a 500-shot of nitrous in the 350, go down the 1/4 fast (might take me a few tries to master the launch), but I guarantee you the VQ will grenade MUCH quicker w/ that abuse.
Furthermore, I'd be willing to bet the stress on a turbo motor (even a factory turbo motor) would be less on the 1/4 than on a roadcourse. One 20 minute session on a roadcourse where you're either on full throttle or hard braking is far more stressful than a < 13 second run at the 1/4 given equal motors.
There are reasons why Nissan chose not to up the boost in the VG30DETT (to at least increase 300ZX sales), partly because of emissions, but more importantly Nissan would not be able to guarantee the reliability of the motor (i.e. it's no longer "bulletproof"). The VG30DETT is a de-tuned race engine and for the most part still over-built, but once you increase the power levels, it becomes less "over-built."
No harm, no foul. I've got a thick skin and I can be the keyboard warrior (I can dish it out and I can take it in). Like I said, I went through the whole phase. I loved my 300, but I never enjoyed it for what it was worth. It's personally frustrating to see others go through the phase I went through.
Michael.
Furthermore, you and your track comrades seem to think we all want boost to throw it on a road course. Me, personally, I own an autocross vehicle myself and to be honest, it's only cost me about $20K, NO WAY in hell am I throwing my nice BRAND NEW $30K unmodded Z on a track such as a roadcourse to destroy it. Some of us don't make the $85K+/year to take our pride and joy on a track to wreck/ruin it and then spend $k's more fixing it (BTW once wrecked it will NEVER be the same.) BUT if you're able to do so, I say kudos and best of luck, show em what the Z can do. It's not "my bag" I'm a drag strip rat. I get my rocks off charging down a straight strip of pavement listening to a a 3.5l engine just screaming in delight begging for more as I pace towards that finish line. No worries, no cares about the driver next to me, I don't have to think about his driving abilities as he'll be in his lane and I in mine. When it's all said and done I can say I had fun, if I can have the fun all the while going faster (i.e. FI) then I'll leave the track with a smile on my face. Everyday driving to me is like being on a road course, I can't do 140 (legally) down a city street, it's not about beating someone or drifitng around a turn, it's about "going faster and faster until the fear of death is overcome by the thrill of speed." for me.
I see your point about wear and tear on a road track, but there are other applications in the motorsports world besides road course racing, and as such, a turbo would seem a worthy modification to those who agree with that last statement.
#46
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lakeview Point, MS
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
6-10... I wouldn't say... maybe 6-8 tops without digging into the lower end to reinforce. Like it was mentioned, the more you put in FI-wise, the more you're going to break. I wouldn't push the pressure much past 7 psi to be on the safe side. Even then, you're looking at another 60-120 hp (<--- A LOOSE GUESTIMATE)
#47
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
s
I've been reading over a lot of these posts, and I have to agree that adding a supercharger will shorten your engine life if you're going to be autox ing... but on that note, if you're driving around on a track, you're going to shorten your engine life anyway. If you set things up right, and don't go crazy w/ your boost, I don't think that there will be a lot of damage or shortening of your engine life.
I think what some people here are trying to say is that if you're going to be taking your car to the track, you have to have a lot of spare cash to spend on fixing things anyway, so you might as well go for more power for the straight sections of the course. Also, 99 percent of Z owners will never take their cars to the track, thus if you're going for more power on the street and around town, or for the drag strip, this is a worthwhile product for those people.
As others have said, to each their own, all this post was supposed to be showing was a new product coming out that will be an alternative to other superchargers and turbos. This wasn't meant to be a FI or not to FI debate. That being said, if anyone finds new info on this product, please keep everyone updated.
As far as power gains, without getting into too much guessing, it will definitely be more than stealins for sure, and it won't require tapping into the oilpan or removing the anti-roll bar. I would estimate the power gains to put it around 350 rwhp roughly at 7psi. This is a rough estimate, but if you know other people with similar setups from ATI, then this is actually somewhat conservative.
I think what some people here are trying to say is that if you're going to be taking your car to the track, you have to have a lot of spare cash to spend on fixing things anyway, so you might as well go for more power for the straight sections of the course. Also, 99 percent of Z owners will never take their cars to the track, thus if you're going for more power on the street and around town, or for the drag strip, this is a worthwhile product for those people.
As others have said, to each their own, all this post was supposed to be showing was a new product coming out that will be an alternative to other superchargers and turbos. This wasn't meant to be a FI or not to FI debate. That being said, if anyone finds new info on this product, please keep everyone updated.
As far as power gains, without getting into too much guessing, it will definitely be more than stealins for sure, and it won't require tapping into the oilpan or removing the anti-roll bar. I would estimate the power gains to put it around 350 rwhp roughly at 7psi. This is a rough estimate, but if you know other people with similar setups from ATI, then this is actually somewhat conservative.
#48
Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Well i am one of those that likes to have the balance between having a powerful car ( i will be intrested in the superchargers seems like a good company ) i also like it to be able to handle good ( i will probally geting tein EFDC later on ) and i like my car to be pretty too ( 19" GT-Cs comming thats why i need to power )
#49
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by westpak
They want proof of what we are saying yet they have no proof of what they are saying either...QUOTE]
Proof or not, the following companies have been producing reliable supercharger systems for a long long long time...
Toyota/TRD
Jackson Racing
Comptech
Vortech
Many of their applications include high compression N/A engines.
Are you taking a risk? Yes. Is your drivetrain warranty out the window? Yup. Am I going to get one? Maybe a few years down the line if they have been running well on 350Zs for a while.
Look, I'm not saying bolting on a supercharger is something to be taken lightly. I just don't subscribe to the paranoia that if you add reasonable boost your engine is instant toast.
They want proof of what we are saying yet they have no proof of what they are saying either...QUOTE]
Proof or not, the following companies have been producing reliable supercharger systems for a long long long time...
Toyota/TRD
Jackson Racing
Comptech
Vortech
Many of their applications include high compression N/A engines.
Are you taking a risk? Yes. Is your drivetrain warranty out the window? Yup. Am I going to get one? Maybe a few years down the line if they have been running well on 350Zs for a while.
Look, I'm not saying bolting on a supercharger is something to be taken lightly. I just don't subscribe to the paranoia that if you add reasonable boost your engine is instant toast.
#50
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Coeur d'Alene, ID
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back on the subject of ATI...
I've known of ATI for quite some time. They are a big name in the FI arena with Dodge Dakotas (where im originaly from). The ATI kits always proved to be very reliable, have very high outputs, and be cost effective. After reading this post, i'm going to be keeping a close eye on ATI.
My first plan was to get a twin turbo kit. Be it from Greddy, PE, or whoever, i wanted a twin turbo kit. But now that i read about ATI, i'm going to put that plan on hold. Now im not saying im completely ditching turbos because some company is now making a supercharger kit. I'm just going to pay attention because ATI has always been at the top of my book.
From looking at dyno charts, and driving my car, I think a supercharger would best complment the current power output of the Z. Now, i could be totaly off base here, but a I just prefer a flatter curve with low peak numbers than a sharp curve with high numbers.
My advice? Go with what you want. The turbo vs. s/c vs. na war has been going on for along time. Personally i could care less if my engine's life span was shorted because i used a turbo or s/c. There's no way i could buy another one either. Hell, i cant hardly pay for the Z it self. But i'm going to do some sort of FI. Why? Because its fun.
-DrCold
I've known of ATI for quite some time. They are a big name in the FI arena with Dodge Dakotas (where im originaly from). The ATI kits always proved to be very reliable, have very high outputs, and be cost effective. After reading this post, i'm going to be keeping a close eye on ATI.
My first plan was to get a twin turbo kit. Be it from Greddy, PE, or whoever, i wanted a twin turbo kit. But now that i read about ATI, i'm going to put that plan on hold. Now im not saying im completely ditching turbos because some company is now making a supercharger kit. I'm just going to pay attention because ATI has always been at the top of my book.
From looking at dyno charts, and driving my car, I think a supercharger would best complment the current power output of the Z. Now, i could be totaly off base here, but a I just prefer a flatter curve with low peak numbers than a sharp curve with high numbers.
My advice? Go with what you want. The turbo vs. s/c vs. na war has been going on for along time. Personally i could care less if my engine's life span was shorted because i used a turbo or s/c. There's no way i could buy another one either. Hell, i cant hardly pay for the Z it self. But i'm going to do some sort of FI. Why? Because its fun.
-DrCold
#51
I personally don't care about the warranty or extended engine life myself. I bought the car with the intention of modifiying it and as a third vehicle driven in fair weather.
I had a Maxima with close to 200,000 miles on it and it still ran beautifully. If by adding FI to my 350Z shortens my engine life by half to 100,000 who cares. That is more than 14 years of driving!
I have never owned a car 14 years.
If this car was my only mode of transportation then I personally wouldn't be doing any modifications and probably not be on this board.
Jeff
I had a Maxima with close to 200,000 miles on it and it still ran beautifully. If by adding FI to my 350Z shortens my engine life by half to 100,000 who cares. That is more than 14 years of driving!
I have never owned a car 14 years.
If this car was my only mode of transportation then I personally wouldn't be doing any modifications and probably not be on this board.
Jeff
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Coeur d'Alene, ID
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess thats why everyone thinks im crazy. The Z is my only car, and my daily driver. I put about 800-1000 miles a week on the car. But thats mostly because i just enjoy driving it. I will do some sort of FI, and i will probably pay the price for it.
I put almost 50k miles on my supercharged 2001 Dodge Dakota. I used a roots style blower from Kenne Bell at about 6.5 PSI. It ran just as good the day i traded it in as the day i first put the blower on.
After owning a vehical with FI, i dont think i can every own a car (for very long) with out it. Ah, more power! Grunt Grunt Grunt.
-DrCold
I put almost 50k miles on my supercharged 2001 Dodge Dakota. I used a roots style blower from Kenne Bell at about 6.5 PSI. It ran just as good the day i traded it in as the day i first put the blower on.
After owning a vehical with FI, i dont think i can every own a car (for very long) with out it. Ah, more power! Grunt Grunt Grunt.
-DrCold
#53
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DrCold
I guess thats why everyone thinks im crazy. The Z is my only car, and my daily driver. I put about 800-1000 miles a week on the car. But thats mostly because i just enjoy driving it. I will do some sort of FI, and i will probably pay the price for it.
I guess thats why everyone thinks im crazy. The Z is my only car, and my daily driver. I put about 800-1000 miles a week on the car. But thats mostly because i just enjoy driving it. I will do some sort of FI, and i will probably pay the price for it.
#54
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One more thing to add, a lot of people are saying go to an HPDE and you'll be cured of your need for a power fix. Have they been to an HPDE? There you find some of the worst of the worst as far as everything. First it usually starts with suspension and simple things like that, then they start going after power and crazy weight reduction. The BMW CCA guys I've seen will pay mucho money for engine items that add minimal HP for an extra little edge. Things like $1000 headers that literally add less than 5 HP. I don't buy into only drag racers want more power. Everyone wants an edge.
I want my car to be able to stay with just about anything in a straight line, in the twisties, or on a road course, and still be very liveble as a daily driver. For a lot of us adding some extra power is desired and a RESPONSIBLY boosted supercharger or turbocharger will do that. I'd rather keep the motor NA but getting a lot more power would most likely prove HUGELY expensive and still not yield a nice flexible motor. And yes there is a small number of people who will push the limits and\or are too stupid to know they are pushing the limits and will pop motors.
The ATI is looking very good with the intercooling, but I'll probably still wait for the daring few to go out and get them right away and then make my decision.
I want my car to be able to stay with just about anything in a straight line, in the twisties, or on a road course, and still be very liveble as a daily driver. For a lot of us adding some extra power is desired and a RESPONSIBLY boosted supercharger or turbocharger will do that. I'd rather keep the motor NA but getting a lot more power would most likely prove HUGELY expensive and still not yield a nice flexible motor. And yes there is a small number of people who will push the limits and\or are too stupid to know they are pushing the limits and will pop motors.
The ATI is looking very good with the intercooling, but I'll probably still wait for the daring few to go out and get them right away and then make my decision.
#55
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to clarify the above, just saying that some people push the limits knowingly, whilst others do so with no knowledge of what they are doing. "sure crank up another few pounds... it'll be fine." People are going to break motors, especially with turbos where you're not boost limited. But such is life, I'll go with an extra dose of power please.
#57
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
Sport Z Magazine
Read this webpage!
I strongly suggest everyone reads the ATI Procharger webpages /www.procharger.com/intercooled.shtml . I learned alot from reading their technical information. Maybe some of you are mechanical engineers and know all of this but for me it helped. If what they are saying is correct, their adding an intercooler to the supercharger reduces heat thus allowing more boost. "It is rarely boost that causes detonation, just unnecessary heat. An intercooler is such a natural solution for forced induction". They claim heat which causes detonation is the real threat to durability to your motor. They feel they can safely run a higher boost because of the intercooler. There is a chart on the webpage showing that their intercooler allows them to run a car at over 12 psi and it is as safe as others superchargers without an intercooler running under 5psi. Hmm, does this make sense to everyone or is there skeptics after reading the webpage?
I know that this is their webpage thus information is leaning towards making their product looking good. Maybe some of you with experience can offer feedback after reading the webpage. Maybe you might question their theory that boost does not effect a motor negatively, but only heat. They claim changing timing, injectors etc is a poor bandaide to tunning a FI car and that the reduction in heat by means of an intercooler is the best method. Again, I am new to this game so don't blast me. If you have additional experience, then help me out as I learn. My goal is to get the most reliable motor with good HP gain and meet smog.
Jeff
I know that this is their webpage thus information is leaning towards making their product looking good. Maybe some of you with experience can offer feedback after reading the webpage. Maybe you might question their theory that boost does not effect a motor negatively, but only heat. They claim changing timing, injectors etc is a poor bandaide to tunning a FI car and that the reduction in heat by means of an intercooler is the best method. Again, I am new to this game so don't blast me. If you have additional experience, then help me out as I learn. My goal is to get the most reliable motor with good HP gain and meet smog.
Jeff
Last edited by zland; 04-30-2003 at 11:51 AM.
#59
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
Sport Z Magazine
Safe boost chart
Here is the ATI Procharger graph on safe boost for intercooled superchargers and without.
Again, read all of webpage www.procharger.com/intercooled.shtml before making comments.
Jeff
Again, read all of webpage www.procharger.com/intercooled.shtml before making comments.
Jeff
Last edited by zland; 06-05-2006 at 03:24 PM.