Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Vortech Dyno Number a little low?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #1  
Blackbird CPV35's Avatar
Blackbird CPV35
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default Vortech Dyno Number a little low?


Stock Block
Vortech w/ 2.87 pulley
CJM stage 1 FR
Utec
660cc injectors
Borla Exhaust
Test Pipes
MD 3/8" plenum spacer

I started with a basline of 361 whp then got up to 400, this was on a dynojet so it seemed pretty low for the mods, I had the AF perfect at ~11.4:1. I stopped because I thought that my timing was getting awfully high (I was at 14.5 at the 100% load site at redline) I was experienceing absolutely no knock on 93 octane.

any advice? do you think I still have room for more timing advance, most people with the 2.87 are putting up alot higher numbers than that on a DJ
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:05 PM
  #2  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

not sure what what numbers you are seeing but 400whp is about right with your mods and a 2.87 pulley. im getting around 370whp with my 3.12. i expect to hit about 400whp with a 2.87 pulley.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #3  
Triji's Avatar
Triji
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
From: The Valley, AZ
Default

looks like you are getting a bit of a belt slip at 6200 rpms to redline...
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:12 PM
  #4  
Blackbird CPV35's Avatar
Blackbird CPV35
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by Triji
looks like you are getting a bit of a belt slip at 6200 rpms to redline...

i got the timrod fix and have the tensioner on pretttty tight, looks like i have to tighten it more.

what kind of timing are you guys running at max boost and redline?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #5  
Triji's Avatar
Triji
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
From: The Valley, AZ
Default

I am still using the SS box and 3.12 pulley... I have no clue on my timing actually although I know it is fairly aggressive as I am running a mix of 91 and 101 oct gas.

I hit 380 rwhp on a dyno dynamics dyno which reads a bit low compared to a dynojet...

Looking at your plot from 6200 up it stays flat with a downward tendancy, this is where I think you might be slipping a bit.

I just got the GTM extra idler pulley and am going to install it tomorrow.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #6  
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Mr_pharmD
Registered User
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 1
From: KaLi
Default

not sure if i got this right. U were on the 3.12 pulley before and on this dyno it was around 340 but once u put the 2.87 pulley on it jumped to 400? Is that correct? If so, that's 60hp increase so what are u complaining about? On average, ppl get only 30 hp increase from 3.12 pulley to 2.87. I would like to see what psi you are at and if it's slipping bc the timrod method is suppose to stop slippage.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #7  
Triji's Avatar
Triji
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
From: The Valley, AZ
Default

Ok, I hope you dont mind, I played a bit... where I circled is where I think you can gain more power... I would tend to think slippage here....

I colored in where your power and TQ looks like where it should go... Kinda like my NVDA stock

Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #8  
Blackbird CPV35's Avatar
Blackbird CPV35
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
not sure if i got this right. U were on the 3.12 pulley before and on this dyno it was around 340 but once u put the 2.87 pulley on it jumped to 400? Is that correct? If so, that's 60hp increase so what are u complaining about? On average, ppl get only 30 hp increase from 3.12 pulley to 2.87. I would like to see what psi you are at and if it's slipping bc the timrod method is suppose to stop slippage.

no this is all 2.87, I went from 360 to 400 just messing with the timing

im hitting about 11.5 psi, not sure what the 2.87 is supposed to top out at
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 10:27 PM
  #9  
Triji's Avatar
Triji
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
From: The Valley, AZ
Default

Is this on a 5AT or a 6MT?

was the 360 "before" tuned at all? As I said I am hitting 380 on a dyno dynamics on a 3.12 at 8.5psi and I am a 5AT... This on stock injectors and the SS box...

My main mods are in my sig....

I have RC 650's and a Utec waiting to go in as well as a Walbro... I am going to run the stock fuel rails.

11.5 sounds about right as far as your PSI... thats 3 more PSI than my 3.12 is giving me.

Once I get my 2.87 and Utec in I will let you know what I get out of it.



P.S. did you have to mill your 2.87 to get it to fit? Or did it just go on without any modification?

thanks.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 10:33 PM
  #10  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbird CPV35
no this is all 2.87, I went from 360 to 400 just messing with the timing

im hitting about 11.5 psi, not sure what the 2.87 is supposed to top out at
11.5 psi is damn good. no belt issues there. i just think you were expecting too much from your vortech setup. dont mind the dyno queens who claim 400whp with 3.12's, thats just not realistic. if you really want mid 400's then go with a cam upgrade.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #11  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

add cams and headers if you want more power - and/or a 34 tooth cog pulley
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 11:22 PM
  #12  
cwestrx7's Avatar
cwestrx7
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

man thats exactly what i am hoping to make. thanks for posting your sheet.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 11:49 PM
  #13  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
add cams and headers if you want more power - and/or a 34 tooth cog pulley
sentry, you really think headers are worth it? cost of installation just turns me off on them.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 11:55 PM
  #14  
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Mr_pharmD
Registered User
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 1
From: KaLi
Default

mill down to fit 2.87??? It fits like every other pulley. Headers and cams make a big difference. With the 2.87 pulley i was making 430hp on my AT on DD dyno.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 12:07 AM
  #15  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

i can't say if any mod is worth the money or not, but headers and cams will add more power - so will water/meth injection, higher octane gas, and more timing
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 04:39 AM
  #16  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 2
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbird CPV35

Stock Block
Vortech w/ 2.87 pulley
CJM stage 1 FR
Utec
660cc injectors
Borla Exhaust
Test Pipes
MD 3/8" plenum spacer

I started with a basline of 361 whp then got up to 400, this was on a dynojet so it seemed pretty low for the mods, I had the AF perfect at ~11.4:1. I stopped because I thought that my timing was getting awfully high (I was at 14.5 at the 100% load site at redline) I was experienceing absolutely no knock on 93 octane.

any advice? do you think I still have room for more timing advance, most people with the 2.87 are putting up alot higher numbers than that on a DJ
Great numbers !!! dont push the timing to much !
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 06:05 AM
  #17  
04treefiddy's Avatar
04treefiddy
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Anniston, Al.
Default

Nexx... Dyno queen huh? I made 395/325 with the 3.12 pulley, aam spacer, test pipes, full exhaust and a walbro. I ran 12.2@115 with that setup. So no dyno queen there bud.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 09:07 AM
  #18  
Blackbird CPV35's Avatar
Blackbird CPV35
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default

i wouldnt be complaining if this was 400 hp on a dyno dynamics, but this was on a dynojet sae corrected with the smoothness on 5

and to answer the pulley question, no i didnt have to mill it it just needed to press it onto the jackshaft
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 10:36 AM
  #19  
Triji's Avatar
Triji
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
From: The Valley, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
mill down to fit 2.87??? It fits like every other pulley. Headers and cams make a big difference. With the 2.87 pulley i was making 430hp on my AT on DD dyno.

I was reading this post by booger:

https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/85752-vortech-2-87-pulley-not-right.html


Here is a pic he posted of what happened when he installed the 2.87.








I just don't want to have these same issues as Booger did...
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #20  
Blackbird CPV35's Avatar
Blackbird CPV35
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by Triji
I was reading this post by booger:

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=85752


Here is a pic he posted of what happened when he installed the 2.87.









I just don't want to have these same issues as Booger did...
that might have been a freak incident, I ordered mine from summit racing and it worked fine
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:21 AM.