Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Tuning With CJM Fuel & Vortech...Pres Drop

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2007 | 07:17 AM
  #21  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 1
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
if a new assembly helped the situation, that is a sign of a clogged internal filter. that is the only thing in the pump assembly that could cause a problem, unless your regulator plug o-ring is not sealing, that would allow pressure to internally leak back into the canister.

supercharger cars will max out the fuel system quite a bit sooner, but i would think that 450rwhp would most likely be no problem for the setup... hard to say, but turbo guys can get mid 500s out of the stage 1.

its only blower guys having this fuel system capacity problem from what i have seen, which makes me tend to believe that its close to maxing out the fuel system if its being picky about fresh filters etc. There is no where to go wrong in the hoses/rails/etc for the setup. The aeromotive regulator is very simple and reliable and i have never had anyone need me to replace one yet.

sounds like the pump itself is close to maxing out, and right about the point where a single walbro is maxed out, i think the stock 5/16 hardline used in stage 1 kits is going to become a setback, and also the stock canisters internal plumbing as well, as its not very open in there, i have taken them apart.

if you need anything from me, feel free to contact me via PM or email and I will do whatever I can.
This does go along with the thread I had about a SCed car needing 20 to 25% more fuel than a turbo car . The artical stated if you needed fuel for 400whp , you need to supply fuel for 500-525whp due to parasitic lose . When I ever get around to getting mine finished , we'll see if I start maxing it out also .
Old 10-02-2007 | 08:46 AM
  #22  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by booger
This does go along with the thread I had about a SCed car needing 20 to 25% more fuel than a turbo car . The artical stated if you needed fuel for 400whp , you need to supply fuel for 500-525whp due to parasitic lose . When I ever get around to getting mine finished , we'll see if I start maxing it out also .
doesn't explain why me and Barzten1 start maxing out and dropping pressure while others with the CJM system and vortech haven't
Old 10-02-2007 | 08:57 AM
  #23  
Barzten1's Avatar
Barzten1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,285
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Default

Sentry, what year fuel assembly did you replace yours with? I think I replaced mine with a 04. Do the 06, 07 Zs use the same fuel assmebly or a compatible one. Id buy one and try it if you think its worth a shot.
Old 10-02-2007 | 09:09 AM
  #24  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Barzten1
Sentry, what year fuel assembly did you replace yours with? I think I replaced mine with a 04. Do the 06, 07 Zs use the same fuel assmebly or a compatible one. Id buy one and try it if you think its worth a shot.

i have never seen any variances that would explain the issues we are seeing..but anyone have anything to add?
Old 10-02-2007 | 09:36 AM
  #25  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

I'm really not sure what year my pump assembly is for. GTM picked one up at the nissan dealership when I was there. I'm not even sure if there is anything different about it from year to year. There might not be any difference at all. It's just a weird coincedence that both of us have aug 02 build dates and have the same sorta problem so it's a little suspicious
Old 10-02-2007 | 03:56 PM
  #26  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 1
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
doesn't explain why me and Barzten1 start maxing out and dropping pressure while others with the CJM system and vortech haven't
What I was saying basicly was you could be maxing out the 550 injectors . Or are you running 650's ? cant remember
Old 10-02-2007 | 05:10 PM
  #27  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

I'm running 750's which didn't make any difference from when I switched from 550's

wouldn't the fuel pressure be high if I was maxing out the injectors anyway?
Old 10-02-2007 | 05:27 PM
  #28  
Barzten1's Avatar
Barzten1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,285
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Default

Im running 550's.
Old 10-02-2007 | 05:48 PM
  #29  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 1
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
I'm running 750's which didn't make any difference from when I switched from 550's

wouldn't the fuel pressure be high if I was maxing out the injectors anyway?
Maxing the injectors is out then .

Fuel presure shouldnt rise because a fuel injector is maxed out...I wouldnt think anyway
Old 10-03-2007 | 01:59 AM
  #30  
Barzten1's Avatar
Barzten1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,285
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Default

Holey crap that 2.87 pully pulls like crazy.
Old 10-03-2007 | 08:27 AM
  #31  
D-tuned's Avatar
D-tuned
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: virginia beach,VA
Default

by your comment, i'm assuming you figured out what the problem was


Originally Posted by Barzten1
Holey crap that 2.87 pully pulls like crazy.
Old 10-03-2007 | 09:05 AM
  #32  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

The injectors would have nothing to do with rising pressure because the pump just supplies a given volume of fuel and the restriction in the return line (FPR) is the only thing that will raise the pressure. What ever given volume won't flow through the injectors when you max them out will simply go out through the FPR and return to tank.

A pressure drop is most likely from not enough fuel being flowed by the pump. or a restriction in the supply line.

I'm hoping that I don't run into to issues with this on my supercharger setup.
Old 10-03-2007 | 09:08 AM
  #33  
Barzten1's Avatar
Barzten1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,285
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Default

No, my fuel pressure takes a dive but my a/f is still in the low to mid 11's. I've always wondered about giving up on Vortech and going with turbos. This is really plenty of usable power for me. Im very happy with it. If you guys have a good tuner and a vortech kit, slap on the 2.87 pulley. Huge difference.
Old 10-03-2007 | 09:47 AM
  #34  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

yeah each pulley step up is a big deal change because it not only increases the overall power, but also makes it come on about 500 rpms sooner than before. After the 2.87 you can get the 34 tooth rear cog pulley and take it up even another step, but belt slip and fuel are going to be the issues to work out

I laugh every time I read about guys running a stock vortech with the 3.33 pulley then say it's just not powerful enough and switch to turbos. They didn't even give the kit a chance to show what it can do.
Old 10-03-2007 | 09:54 AM
  #35  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

yeah each pulley step up is a big deal change because it not only increases the overall power, but also makes it come on about 500 rpms sooner than before. After the 2.87 you can get the 34 tooth rear cog pulley and take it up even another step, but belt slip and fuel are going to be the issues to work out

I laugh every time I read about guys running a stock vortech with the 3.33 pulley then say it's just not powerful enough and switch to turbos. They didn't even give the kit a chance to show what it can do.
Hehe... I'm going to be running a 3.25 pulley to begin with and it will most likely be as much boost as a sub 3" pulley since mine is driven off the factory AC outer diameter which is bigger.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
08-06-2021 06:19 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
04-22-2021 09:42 PM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
11-09-2020 10:27 AM



Quick Reply: Tuning With CJM Fuel & Vortech...Pres Drop



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:12 AM.