Brian Crower Cams..Setting The Bar!!
Originally Posted by Bullitproof
i dont know what your LOW boost map is but this is mine at 15psi( my low boost)probably would have made more power if i had a port and polish on the heads. the low boost is the dotted line. the solid line is 18psi. all on 93 octane.


your comment was those cams make power all the way to redline. looking at your last graph, power starts to drop off after 6400rpm. not significantly but it doesnt rise. you are right, my chart does stop, because i dont have the valvetrain to support 7500rpms. are you trying to say that these cams are drop in and you will see gains past 6500? or do you need the ferrea valvetrain upgrade to see the results you had?
Originally Posted by rcdash
what cams did you put in Bullitproof? GTM?
Last edited by Bullitproof; Oct 4, 2007 at 09:19 AM.
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
This means nothing to me..The dynochart stops at 6500 rpms, mine continues for another 1000rpms with no signifigant drop off.
jules so this are STG2 not STG3 cams then?
thats pretty impressive
Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
where was the thread to check out the pics dynosheetss 

Last edited by Dynosty; Oct 5, 2007 at 08:45 AM. Reason: Stage 2, 264s not stg3 272
Originally Posted by Hal@IP
Here is a screenshot of the dyno of our head package and BC 272's, 92octane pumpgas, 16 and 18psi.

tHANKS!!
lolu are using the STG3 cams though right?
Originally Posted by thawk408
I have the rev up motor.

damm
Julian... sorry if i missed this part but what are you running on this setup for intake manifold...stock? 5/16? 5/16+mrev? tallboy/crawford?
EDIT (sorry, just checked the box): BC Stage2, 262s . Along with our Level3 head, BC +1 valves, etc.
tHANKS!!
lol
u are using the STG3 cams though right?
Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
tHANKS!!
lolu are using the STG3 cams though right?
Last edited by Dynosty; Oct 5, 2007 at 08:45 AM. Reason: Stage 2, 264s not stg3 272
Hal, Julian,
Consistently impressive dynosheets...
From the specs alone they don't seem that different (for stage 2) vs. say the JWT S1 cams as noted above. Can you speculate on other factors or attributes of these cams or supporting mods that are allowing these cars to hold power so well past 6500rpms?
thx
Consistently impressive dynosheets...
From the specs alone they don't seem that different (for stage 2) vs. say the JWT S1 cams as noted above. Can you speculate on other factors or attributes of these cams or supporting mods that are allowing these cars to hold power so well past 6500rpms?
thx
Originally Posted by rcdash
Hal, Julian,
Consistently impressive dynosheets...
From the specs alone they don't seem that different (for stage 2) vs. say the JWT S1 cams as noted above. Can you speculate on other factors or attributes of these cams or supporting mods that are allowing these cars to hold power so well past 6500rpms?
thx
Consistently impressive dynosheets...
From the specs alone they don't seem that different (for stage 2) vs. say the JWT S1 cams as noted above. Can you speculate on other factors or attributes of these cams or supporting mods that are allowing these cars to hold power so well past 6500rpms?
thx



