IntensePower w/ PowerLab Single Turbo Kit Stage 1.5 GT37R / ProEFI ECU Makes 706RWHP
imagine what that yould read on the butt-dyno!!! 
11-09-2007, 04:00 PM
#22
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (64)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 3,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
butt dyno
My butt dyno while stuffed in the trunk area read " HOLY SH*T!!!" then the boost kicked in and my head slammed against the trunk lid.
G35 trunk 1 - My Noggin 0
Hans G35 FTMFW absolute BEAST!
G35 trunk 1 - My Noggin 0
Hans G35 FTMFW absolute BEAST!
11-09-2007, 04:25 PM
#23
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by IntenseAero
My butt dyno while stuffed in the trunk area read " HOLY SH*T!!!" then the boost kicked in and my head slammed against the trunk lid.
G35 trunk 1 - My Noggin 0
Hans G35 FTMFW absolute BEAST!
G35 trunk 1 - My Noggin 0
Hans G35 FTMFW absolute BEAST!
11-09-2007, 04:33 PM
#24
Originally Posted by IntenseAero
My butt dyno while stuffed in the trunk area read " HOLY SH*T!!!" then the boost kicked in and my head slammed against the trunk lid.
G35 trunk 1 - My Noggin 0
Hans G35 FTMFW absolute BEAST!
G35 trunk 1 - My Noggin 0
Hans G35 FTMFW absolute BEAST!
Literally too much junk in the trunk, LOL!!!
J/K
Sorry Pete!!! Had to say it!
11-09-2007, 07:17 PM
#28
Originally Posted by IntenseFab
With the variable cam timing disabled... yes.. With it enabled you'll have alot more midrange.
11-09-2007, 07:25 PM
#29
Sponsor
Intense Motorsports
Intense Motorsports
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In the LAB
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
You keep saying that but I'll believe it when I see the after CT tuning results. I remember reading SaM@GTM saying he had messed with CT on a FI set-up with no real gains to be had given the time to tune. Of course that is only one "opinion" but until we (Z community) see otherwise what else do we have to go by...look forward to updated results, I do think gains can be had but not enough to fill the gap due to lag.
trust me the midrange difference is huge. (Same car, same engine, same turbo system only with the 35R). We haven't been testing the 37R until recently.
Last edited by IntenseFab; 11-09-2007 at 07:29 PM.
11-09-2007, 07:32 PM
#31
Sponsor
Intense Motorsports
Intense Motorsports
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In the LAB
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Awesome, cant wait to see it at high boost...
11-09-2007, 07:53 PM
#33
Sponsor
Intense Motorsports
Intense Motorsports
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In the LAB
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Kit looks sick, I hope somebody with "capable" hands gets it to a track to see what kind of traps it can pull. I can only imagine with a plenum that would make power to 7500rpm's or more would = a longer better powerband!
11-09-2007, 09:30 PM
#34
Sponsor
Intense Motorsports
Intense Motorsports
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In the LAB
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
You keep saying that but I'll believe it when I see the after CT tuning results. I remember reading SaM@GTM saying he had messed with CT on a FI set-up with no real gains to be had given the time to tune. Of course that is only one "opinion" but until we (Z community) see otherwise what else do we have to go by...look forward to updated results, I do think gains can be had but not enough to fill the gap due to lag.
Peak TQ is.. over 1000 RPM Sooner, so i'd say that it makes a difference, when the 37R is roughly 500rpm laggier then the 35R
Last edited by IntenseFab; 11-09-2007 at 09:36 PM.
11-10-2007, 06:06 AM
#36
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by IntenseFab
This is all I could conjure up tonight, but this is a run with the 35R w/ UTEC, same built engine w/ cams , injectors etc. (W/ VTC Enabled). Compared to our 37R run with no VTC
Peak TQ is.. over 1000 RPM Sooner, so i'd say that it makes a difference, when the 37R is roughly 500rpm laggier then the 35R
Peak TQ is.. over 1000 RPM Sooner, so i'd say that it makes a difference, when the 37R is roughly 500rpm laggier then the 35R
Originally Posted by IntenseFab
Also we might be testing out the cosworth plenum as well
as soon as mine gets in you are
Originally Posted by Alberto
Kit looks sick, I hope somebody with "capable" hands gets it to a track to see what kind of traps it can pull.
it will =]..i think they will try to get the G35 at the track for a few test runs..i think you will be pretty impressed
Last edited by IIQuickSilverII; 11-10-2007 at 06:08 AM.
11-10-2007, 03:11 PM
#39
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Kit looks sick, I hope somebody with "capable" hands gets it to a track to see what kind of traps it can pull. I can only imagine with a plenum that would make power to 7500rpm's or more would = a longer better powerband!
Next year is going to be NICE
PM me and we'll chat.
11-10-2007, 04:34 PM
#40
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by TENGAI
'Berto - once I get the kit, I'll be doing the install with Dave and co. followed up by a tuning session on the DD. Although I'm pretty much set on using a Haltech for tuning, the ProEFI has my interest enough that if I get one with the kit I'd be game to see a few pulls with it at a minimum. We'll see.
Next year is going to be NICE
PM me and we'll chat.
Next year is going to be NICE
PM me and we'll chat.
ill let you know how the pro-efi feels
