Can somebody list the fastest spooling twin turbo kit to the slowest twin turbo spool
Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
I hope I am not being bated here ...... but
It wasn't a dyno session to brag about and we were in a hurry to get out of there and loaded up for the Laguna Seca Time Attack the very next day, so I didn't get a copy of it and I am not sure if any of the pulls from that session were even saved. The car actually ended up loseing a bit of peak power compared to the previous sessions, do to these new cams uncovering even more breathing restrictions do to us still running the original JWT FMIC and pipeing that was designed for the standard 530BB kit. This last time the car made 680ish whp at 20 psi. We found that 20 psi is all the standard JWT TT kit pipeing and FMIC wanted to handle eficiently. But the cams did help to reduce the lag by quite a bit and we noticed it even more at Cal. Spdwy. at the last track day we were at.
Our next step will be a bigger FMIC and bigger IC plumbing.
It wasn't a dyno session to brag about and we were in a hurry to get out of there and loaded up for the Laguna Seca Time Attack the very next day, so I didn't get a copy of it and I am not sure if any of the pulls from that session were even saved. The car actually ended up loseing a bit of peak power compared to the previous sessions, do to these new cams uncovering even more breathing restrictions do to us still running the original JWT FMIC and pipeing that was designed for the standard 530BB kit. This last time the car made 680ish whp at 20 psi. We found that 20 psi is all the standard JWT TT kit pipeing and FMIC wanted to handle eficiently. But the cams did help to reduce the lag by quite a bit and we noticed it even more at Cal. Spdwy. at the last track day we were at.
Our next step will be a bigger FMIC and bigger IC plumbing.
Maybe we can race one day.
The new cams that I am refering to are not available anywhere and were an experiment that we were trying out with JWT. I am not sure on the exact specs (I can get them Monday morning), but I can tell you that these cams are HUGE, and I am certain that they are the biggest cams ever attempted in a VQ35. I do know that they had a gross lift of .512" and valve lift of .500". Yes, that is half an inch of valve lift 
. I can also tell you that we had to machine clearance the heads and even the valve covers to even get these monsters to even fit in the head. These cams would be interesting in an NA motor too. We had to seriously raise the idle as there pretty much is no idle below 2200-2300 rpm, not street practicle to say the least.
. I can also tell you that we had to machine clearance the heads and even the valve covers to even get these monsters to even fit in the head. These cams would be interesting in an NA motor too. We had to seriously raise the idle as there pretty much is no idle below 2200-2300 rpm, not street practicle to say the least.
Last edited by WA2GOOD; Dec 16, 2007 at 02:17 PM.
Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
The new cams that I am refering to are not available anywhere and were an experiment that we were trying out with JWT. I am not sure on the exact specs (I can get them Monday morning), but I can tell you that these cams are HUGE, and I am certain that they are the biggest cams ever attempted in a VQ35. I do know that they had a gross lift of .512" and valve lift of .500". Yes, that is half an inch of valve lift . I can also tell you that we had to machine clearance the heads and even the valve covers to even get these monsters to even fot in the head. These cams would be interesting in an NA motor too. We had to seriously raise the idle as there pretty much is no idle below 2200-2300 rpm, not street practicle to say the least.
. I can also tell you that we had to machine clearance the heads and even the valve covers to even get these monsters to even fot in the head. These cams would be interesting in an NA motor too. We had to seriously raise the idle as there pretty much is no idle below 2200-2300 rpm, not street practicle to say the least.We just made 1280whp on a stock motor!!
We just used some magic turbos that spool up to 35psi at idle.Their mad JDM tite YO! We purched them from Paul Walker and had Chuck Norris put a budist monk blessing on them. Were at full boost at 2rpms!!
We also used a top secred MRC stage 37 cam, we call it the K57AREA51.Their made of platonium and titanium and have a 4' lift.We had to put a scoop on the hood to make em fit...
J/K
We also used a top secred MRC stage 37 cam, we call it the K57AREA51.Their made of platonium and titanium and have a 4' lift.We had to put a scoop on the hood to make em fit...
J/K
Last edited by Julian@MRC; Dec 16, 2007 at 02:19 PM.
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
So your saying your making 680whp on a split second box!Pretty impressive.
Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
Yes, SS box, still no fuel return system, single 255 FP, 750cc inj, the OEM head gasket, OEM head studs, and OEM main studs.
Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
Yes, SS box, still no fuel return system, single 255 FP, 750cc inj, the OEM head gasket, OEM head studs, and OEM main studs.
-George
GT Motorsports
Originally Posted by George@GTM
On the 680whp run, with the single Walbro, what kind of fuel was used and what was the A/F like? Just curious.
-George
GT Motorsports
-George
GT Motorsports
Also remember this is a JWT FMU with a power inverted 12 volt system to get the needed voltage to the fuel pump to keep up with the fuel pressure.
Last edited by WA2GOOD; Dec 16, 2007 at 02:32 PM.
Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
C16 only in this car and the A/F as I remember reading it on the straights was in the 11.XX's on the inovate wideband
Also remember this is a JWT FMU with a power inverted 12 volt system to get the needed voltage to the fuel pump to keep up with the fuel pressure.
Also remember this is a JWT FMU with a power inverted 12 volt system to get the needed voltage to the fuel pump to keep up with the fuel pressure.
Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
The new cams that I am refering to are not available anywhere and were an experiment that we were trying out with JWT. I am not sure on the exact specs (I can get them Monday morning), but I can tell you that these cams are HUGE, and I am certain that they are the biggest cams ever attempted in a VQ35. I do know that they had a gross lift of .512" and valve lift of .500". Yes, that is half an inch of valve lift . I can also tell you that we had to machine clearance the heads and even the valve covers to even get these monsters to even fit in the head. These cams would be interesting in an NA motor too. We had to seriously raise the idle as there pretty much is no idle below 2200-2300 rpm, not street practicle to say the least.
. I can also tell you that we had to machine clearance the heads and even the valve covers to even get these monsters to even fit in the head. These cams would be interesting in an NA motor too. We had to seriously raise the idle as there pretty much is no idle below 2200-2300 rpm, not street practicle to say the least.http://www.jimwolftechnology.com/wol...INCL_REVUP.pdf
Originally Posted by thawk408
You said it was the C9 correct? Yes you can buy them cause I called about them last week.
http://www.jimwolftechnology.com/wol...INCL_REVUP.pdf
http://www.jimwolftechnology.com/wol...INCL_REVUP.pdf
Last edited by WA2GOOD; Dec 16, 2007 at 03:01 PM.
Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
Wow, you might be right. These might be for sale now. If these are the same ones that Jim had Mark put in our car than they are very agressive, hope you like them.
Originally Posted by thawk408
Jim told me they are availabe, but they are to big for me. That lift is insane. Ill stick with the little c8r.
From what I understand USUALLY (not always),a bigger cam will give you more top end power, but will have less low/midrange.
At least this appears to be the case in Corvettes and big V8's.
Not sure about a TT VQ. Again I don't know enough to say anything for sure, I'll let Julian or someone else chime in.
At least this appears to be the case in Corvettes and big V8's.
Not sure about a TT VQ. Again I don't know enough to say anything for sure, I'll let Julian or someone else chime in.
Originally Posted by Devil Z
From what I understand USUALLY (not always),a bigger cam will give you more top end power, but will have less low/midrange.
At least this appears to be the case in Corvettes and big V8's.
Not sure about a TT VQ. Again I don't know enough to say anything for sure, I'll let Julian or someone else chime in.
At least this appears to be the case in Corvettes and big V8's.
Not sure about a TT VQ. Again I don't know enough to say anything for sure, I'll let Julian or someone else chime in.
Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
I hope I am not being bated here ...... but
It wasn't a dyno session to brag about and we were in a hurry to get out of there and loaded up for the Laguna Seca Time Attack the very next day, so I didn't get a copy of it and I am not sure if any of the pulls from that session were even saved. The car actually ended up loseing a bit of peak power compared to the previous sessions, do to these new cams uncovering even more breathing restrictions do to us still running the original JWT FMIC and pipeing that was designed for the standard 530BB kit. This last time the car made 680ish whp at 20 psi. We found that 20 psi is all the standard JWT TT kit pipeing and FMIC wanted to handle eficiently. But the cams did help to reduce the lag by quite a bit and we noticed it even more at Cal. Spdwy. at the last track day we were at.
Our next step will be a bigger FMIC and bigger IC plumbing.
It wasn't a dyno session to brag about and we were in a hurry to get out of there and loaded up for the Laguna Seca Time Attack the very next day, so I didn't get a copy of it and I am not sure if any of the pulls from that session were even saved. The car actually ended up loseing a bit of peak power compared to the previous sessions, do to these new cams uncovering even more breathing restrictions do to us still running the original JWT FMIC and pipeing that was designed for the standard 530BB kit. This last time the car made 680ish whp at 20 psi. We found that 20 psi is all the standard JWT TT kit pipeing and FMIC wanted to handle eficiently. But the cams did help to reduce the lag by quite a bit and we noticed it even more at Cal. Spdwy. at the last track day we were at.
Our next step will be a bigger FMIC and bigger IC plumbing.
Dude you HAVE GOT TO STOP! Every time you post this $hit you lose credibility! Personally i think you are full of $hit on just about everything you say, but for your own good JUST SHUT UP!!!