Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Eagletanggreen: CJM Twins "ALA JKenefic"

Old Jan 1, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #21  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Looks good Luie - thanks for posting pics. Any issues putting the electrical relays that close to the opening? I don't imagine that vapors would leak out in that area, but just double checking... I'd be a little worried about the tiny spark across the contacts if there happens to be fuel vapor escaping. I don't know if typical automotive relays are air tight.

Last edited by rcdash; Jan 1, 2008 at 10:00 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #22  
eagletanggreen's Avatar
eagletanggreen
Thread Starter
Got Track!!!!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
Looks good Luie - thanks for posting pics. Any issues putting the electrical relays that close to the opening? I don't imagine that vapors would leak out in that area, but just double checking... I'd be a little worried about the tiny spark across the contacts if there happens to be fuel vapor escaping. I don't know if typical automotive relays are air tight.

I am sure it not issue, or Joe would have not install them there. Heck I have seen people put big stereo amps in that location and those have more chance of electrical spark. If that was the case I think we would have seen a couple Z's up in flames.

Last edited by eagletanggreen; Jan 1, 2008 at 10:34 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #23  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

I would think that if there were enough fumes present to ignite, you'd be smelling it for a while first.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #24  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
Looks great, realy clean install, but may I ask WHY ?

Don't realy see a need for these, at all.
A need for twin pumps? Probably because a single walbro on stock voltage is basicly maxed out over 600wheel DD, or atleast I know mine is. And lou is going for 700+wheel
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #25  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

L's fuel system was pretty much at/beyond the limit when we tuned it last. I start getting a little worried after 600whp with the single walbro, as they were never designed for those type of sustained power levels. Without resorting to some less elegant solutions, such as voltage boosters, or x:1 FMU's, the twin pump is the perfect solution for the ultra high powered setups.

Nice work Joe....can't wait to tune this beast again!
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #26  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
Looks great, realy clean install, but may I ask WHY ?

Don't realy see a need for these, at all.
Your already making the top of the list for stupid comments of 2008

Luie-looks great, Joe like always good work man!
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 02:13 PM
  #27  
Blackbird CPV35's Avatar
Blackbird CPV35
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default

Did you skip doing the CJM stage 2 hardline and just use a SS braided feed line? any reason why
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #28  
MADScientist's Avatar
MADScientist
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
looks good guys, thanks for posting the pics.

the level sensor is facing the opposite way? let me know how it works out like that, never really thought of it! EDIT nevermind, I can see when you put it back together you did it flipped 180 degrees on the top. shouldnt make any difference like that with one exception, the pump with the blue hose clamped on its siphon outlet is supposed to the be the pump that draws from the siphon nipple. it probably wont make a different, but its something to keep in mind.

Honestly... I did not notice that I put the pump assembly back in with the pumps switched... Charles, if you think that will be an issue then I will open it back up and switch them around. Fitting the assembly down in to the opening of the tank was tight, but I got it in there with the level sensor scraping on the way in. Could be interesting getting it back out, but I am sure it can be done. I know you have already addressed this issue in the next production run, but the clearance was not as bad as I thought it would be. Also making sure that the syphon tube did not get tangled up in the level sensor float was tricky, but a long srew driver made it easier.

I had to find a fuse for the 10 gage power wire that was ran to the pumps, I stole the one from my car that was 40 amps, which I will change when I can get the correct amp rating. But the car started right up, did not even have to make an adjustment to the FPR... Gas level is reading properly as far as I can tell.

As for how loud the pumps are... You can def tell you have something going on in the gas tank now!

Only other thing I was thinking of adding was a skid plate where the -6AN to -8AN Y fitting is. It is all tucked up in there pretty well, but maybe a good idea to make a little stainless steel shield to protect that in the event of a impact. Other than that I am happy with the install, the CJM pump assembly is a work of art! Now it is Sharif's turn to work his magic. Dyno is scheduled for the 18th of this month, I am sure the results will be posted shortly after.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #29  
MADScientist's Avatar
MADScientist
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbird CPV35
Did you skip doing the CJM stage 2 hardline and just use a SS braided feed line? any reason why

The rest of the system is an old school version of the AAM system.

The system runs 2 -6AN that Y to an -8AN then back to 2 -6AN to feed each rail. Then I also switched the AAM -4AN return for a -6AN return.

You could run 2 -6AN all the way to the front of the car (one to each rail), but after speaking to Charles on the phone he suggested to run a single -8AN/-10AN with Ys at the ends. Who am I to question the guy who designed the thing? lol
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 05:34 PM
  #30  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
Default

Originally Posted by Philthy
Most likely due to your hp levels and magic vodoo
...


Philthy..... I am applying for "Trade Mark" on the word Voodoo , alot of people are starting to believe in it

Last edited by XKR; Jan 1, 2008 at 05:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #31  
eagletanggreen's Avatar
eagletanggreen
Thread Starter
Got Track!!!!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by jkenefic
Honestly... I did not notice that I put the pump assembly back in with the pumps switched... Charles, if you think that will be an issue then I will open it back up and switch them around. Fitting the assembly down in to the opening of the tank was tight, but I got it in there with the level sensor scraping on the way in. Could be interesting getting it back out, but I am sure it can be done. I know you have already addressed this issue in the next production run, but the clearance was not as bad as I thought it would be. Also making sure that the syphon tube did not get tangled up in the level sensor float was tricky, but a long srew driver made it easier.

I had to find a fuse for the 10 gage power wire that was ran to the pumps, I stole the one from my car that was 40 amps, which I will change when I can get the correct amp rating. But the car started right up, did not even have to make an adjustment to the FPR... Gas level is reading properly as far as I can tell.

As for how loud the pumps are... You can def tell you have something going on in the gas tank now!

Only other thing I was thinking of adding was a skid plate where the -6AN to -8AN Y fitting is. It is all tucked up in there pretty well, but maybe a good idea to make a little stainless steel shield to protect that in the event of a impact. Other than that I am happy with the install, the CJM pump assembly is a work of art! Now it is Sharif's turn to work his magic. Dyno is scheduled for the 18th of this month, I am sure the results will be posted shortly after.

/\
+1
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #32  
JAM3Z's Avatar
JAM3Z
Phenom
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenville SC
Default

Originally Posted by jkenefic
Dyno is scheduled for the 18th of this month, I am sure the results will be posted shortly after.
I definitely plan on stopping by for that, should be interesting.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 07:40 AM
  #33  
oorx7's Avatar
oorx7
Vendor - Former Vendor
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: lombard IL
Default

Originally Posted by jkenefic
The CJM pump assembly is a work of art!
Thanks for that!!!!!

This thing was a pain in the a$$ to design. Once I had the basic concept down I tried my best to make it look good within the confines that I had to deal with.


Brandon
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 08:30 AM
  #34  
stormcrow's Avatar
stormcrow
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Default

kudos to joe and luie for the pics! and kudos to charles for answering / solving a major problem for high HP Z's on pump... nothing but respect for all of you continuing to push the envelope...
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 02:33 PM
  #35  
superchargedg's Avatar
superchargedg
Damn Noobs
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,274
Likes: 2
From: timonium,md.
Default

All i can say is it looks real sweet luie.And great job installing it joe.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #36  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by jkenefic
Honestly... I did not notice that I put the pump assembly back in with the pumps switched... Charles, if you think that will be an issue then I will open it back up and switch them around. Fitting the assembly down in to the opening of the tank was tight, but I got it in there with the level sensor scraping on the way in. Could be interesting getting it back out, but I am sure it can be done. I know you have already addressed this issue in the next production run, but the clearance was not as bad as I thought it would be. Also making sure that the syphon tube did not get tangled up in the level sensor float was tricky, but a long srew driver made it easier.

I had to find a fuse for the 10 gage power wire that was ran to the pumps, I stole the one from my car that was 40 amps, which I will change when I can get the correct amp rating. But the car started right up, did not even have to make an adjustment to the FPR... Gas level is reading properly as far as I can tell.

As for how loud the pumps are... You can def tell you have something going on in the gas tank now!

Only other thing I was thinking of adding was a skid plate where the -6AN to -8AN Y fitting is. It is all tucked up in there pretty well, but maybe a good idea to make a little stainless steel shield to protect that in the event of a impact. Other than that I am happy with the install, the CJM pump assembly is a work of art! Now it is Sharif's turn to work his magic. Dyno is scheduled for the 18th of this month, I am sure the results will be posted shortly after.
i wouldnt say its extremely important without testing evidence. the problem it could potentially cause and to watch for would be: when the tank is around half tank, when the drivers side is empty, it could possibly cause cavitation by injecting some air into the bottom of the canister. listen to the pumps at idle for a difference in sound or fluctuation in fuel pressure when the driver side is empty and the siphon is no longer drawing fuel over the saddle
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #37  
WA2GOOD's Avatar
WA2GOOD
Banned
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
i wouldnt say its extremely important without testing evidence. the problem it could potentially cause and to watch for would be: when the tank is around half tank, when the drivers side is empty, it could possibly cause cavitation by injecting some air into the bottom of the canister. listen to the pumps at idle for a difference in sound or fluctuation in fuel pressure when the driver side is empty and the siphon is no longer drawing fuel over the saddle
This is true, and if this is going to be a roadcourse car I would worrie about high g-force turns (especially sweepers). Hopefully they won't / don't suck air causing a (air pocket) lean spike. Let us know how it all works out.

Good luck and very clean install Joe.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 08:15 PM
  #38  
eagletanggreen's Avatar
eagletanggreen
Thread Starter
Got Track!!!!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Default

I am sure it's not going to be an issue.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 08:15 PM
  #39  
eagletanggreen's Avatar
eagletanggreen
Thread Starter
Got Track!!!!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Jeremy@Forged
kudos to joe and luie for the pics! and kudos to charles for answering / solving a major problem for high HP Z's on pump... nothing but respect for all of you continuing to push the envelope...

You still have your ride, or a new snake?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 08:16 PM
  #40  
WA2GOOD's Avatar
WA2GOOD
Banned
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by eagletanggreen
I am sure it's not going to be an issue.
Cool, that sounds great then. I know on our Time Attack car (and some of the other cars we have ttracked hard) we need to maintain about 1/3 of a tank or more just so we do not experience fuel sloshing away from the pick-up. I guess that's what 4 G's will do to you on a stock pick up point. Hope there isn't any unforseen problems with this route.

Last edited by WA2GOOD; Jan 3, 2008 at 02:46 AM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:09 AM.