Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

what decides optimum exhaust diameter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 04:26 PM
  #1  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default what decides optimum exhaust diameter?

So what are the criteria that determines the diameter exhaust you should use?

Seems there must be some logic behind different downpipe sizes (2 to 3"), so what about exhaust and test pipes?

Im running about 400 DD rwhp. I have a stock manifolds, Injen SES exhaust (2" ID I think??) with Helix test pipes and am seeing 15psi. I wanna go to a FI specific exhaust and reduce my PSI's while hopefully picking up some HP.

Are there some flow guidelines to reference between a 2.5", 2.75", and 3". I think like an american that bigger is better, so I'm leaning towards the 3" (AAM, FI, or APS).

what say yee?

Thanks
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #2  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

I say that bigger is better when dealing with FI, but the minimum size for power output goes up with how much air you're flowing. The motor is a big air pump, and when you're compressing air into it, it needs somewhere to go, and the larger diameter the exhaust the more efficient the system will be at higher RPMS when the turbo/blower flowing to its peak potential.

That being said, I think on our motor most 2.5" true dual exhausts are good for basic builds up to 550-600whp or so. True dual 3" are good for anything beyond 600whp. Anything under 2.5" true dual or 3" single is not an FI exhaust and will only hurt power delivery.

The argument that you make more torque with a smaller exhaust is kind of misleading as well. I say this because when the motor makes a little more low end torque, the top end is suffering to a greater extent. The tradeoff is far from worth it.

Just my take...
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #3  
Ahsmo's Avatar
Ahsmo
Imakecopies
Premier Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default

After the turbo, opened up as far as possible is the best. Back pressure on the turbine reduces the work out of the turbine which as you can imagine hinders the spool rate.


Look at large gas turbines in electric plants or ships.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 04:49 PM
  #4  
iStan's Avatar
iStan
ZR
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas
Default

Please keep in mind, he's Vortech
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 05:02 PM
  #5  
Ahsmo's Avatar
Ahsmo
Imakecopies
Premier Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default

Originally Posted by istan
Please keep in mind, he's Vortech

Missed that.

Nevermind me.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 05:34 PM
  #6  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

you can put the biggest exhaust possible on the car and it'll help some, but you're still going to be bottlenecking at the engine itself with the stock exhaust manifolds/heads/cams. That's the area I'd bet that would be the biggest improvement for hp/psi.

the optimum setup is one that doesn't change diameter all the sudden. You're better off improving the flow evenly all throughout instead of focusing on only one end of it

the intake manifold/engine/exhaust manifolds is where air is going to be the most dense and directly impact your psi reading

Last edited by sentry65; Mar 19, 2008 at 05:44 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 05:40 PM
  #7  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Couple things to keep in mind. Not all exhausts of the same diameter flow the same necessarily. Muffler choices and exhaust design will impact flow. And I agree with sentry65, with the cavaet that the length of the restriction is also important, and the length of the cat-back exhaust outstrips the pre-cat piping in length.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 05:52 PM
  #8  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
you can put the biggest exhaust possible on the car and it'll help some, but you're still going to be bottlenecking at the engine itself with the stock exhaust manifolds/heads/cams. That's the area I'd bet that would be the biggest improvement for hp/psi.

the optimum setup is one that doesn't change diameter all the sudden. You're better off improving the flow evenly all throughout instead of focusing on only one end of it

the intake manifold/engine/exhaust manifolds is where air is going to be the most dense and directly impact your psi reading
I'm gonna have to agree with sentry. No sudden changes in diameter, smooth bends and 2.5 true dual or a single 3'' will serve 98% of the people on this board.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 06:38 AM
  #9  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

Ya i know i definitely have flow issues. Making 15 psi with HP similar to lower PSI blower setups.

Its the heads, manifold or exhaust, or a combo of all 3.

Replacing my exhaust and test pipes with something larger is easiest.

Manifolds, i dont really wanna change bc who keeps a blower forever and doesnt go turbo? Also, headers never show that much improvement on the dyno. So are they actually flowing better then the stock manifolds??

Cams and Head work is outrageously expensive and would only be an option during a motor build.

engineering is alot of math so there seems there would be specific guidelines on diameters, etc to use.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #10  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

With a SC, you will probably be just fine with a good, straight through design, single 3" system or even a straight through dual 2.5" system.

Stay away from anything with chambers or baffles.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #11  
jouvert00's Avatar
jouvert00
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: T&T
Default

For the very least do some headers & hfc, there will be nice gains to be had with a retune.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #12  
350Z400rwhp's Avatar
350Z400rwhp
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
Default

I'm just doing resonated test pipes and keeping the stock exhaust with a Vortech and a 3.12 pulley. I'm hoping this gives me good mid range torque and keeps the sound at somewhat of a reasonable level. I have heard from more than a few that going too big with a supercharger will lower your mid range torque and make it even more boring to drive. You are flowing a lot more air than I will so if I had to make a suggestion I would say go with the Borla and resonated test pipes. Shouldn't have any rasp and should have a nice deep toned exhaust note.

Last edited by 350Z400rwhp; Mar 20, 2008 at 01:36 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sales@czp
Engine
33
Sep 23, 2019 03:30 PM
Justin100
Intake Exhaust
26
Nov 29, 2015 03:58 PM
Li1ag
Exhaust
1
Sep 28, 2015 02:07 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 AM.