JWT 700 Kit Results
03-25-2008 | 07:35 AM
#22
Originally Posted by merlin3
Is this on stock block? If so isn't that a little lean?
https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...&postcount=346
03-25-2008 | 07:49 AM
#23
Originally Posted by taurran
Nice results, but I'm going to be realistic here and say that the 487 number is way overcorrected. I'd be surprised if the car made 400whp on 6.5psi at sea level with correction, or uncorrected for that matter.
398whp at 6.5psi is still impressive. 487whp is just ridiculous and a bit misleading for those that don't understand correction factors.
398whp at 6.5psi is still impressive. 487whp is just ridiculous and a bit misleading for those that don't understand correction factors.
03-25-2008 | 07:52 AM
#24
wow 1.22 is a lot of correction. i have never seen more than 1.01 or maybe 1.02 on a crazy day. 6.5 pounds should net you right under 400 hp with the 700b turbos on a stock motor.
looks like fun !!! i agree with craig on this one though....
looks like fun !!! i agree with craig on this one though....
03-25-2008 | 10:02 AM
#29
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
wow 1.22 is a lot of correction. i have never seen more than 1.01 or maybe 1.02 on a crazy day. 6.5 pounds should net you right under 400 hp with the 700b turbos on a stock motor.looks like fun !!! i agree with craig on this one though....
03-25-2008 | 10:09 AM
#30
im gonna say 350whpish on sharif's heartbreaker. 
all joking aside, congrats on going F/I. im sure you're loving the power. your car is getting better and better, ive enjoyed seeing the the RobertK 350z evolution.
all joking aside, congrats on going F/I. im sure you're loving the power. your car is getting better and better, ive enjoyed seeing the the RobertK 350z evolution.
03-25-2008 | 11:22 AM
#33
Originally Posted by Robert_K
1) There will always be hater
2) Elevation
3) Conservitive tune
4) Fuck you... I'm happy.
2) Elevation
3) Conservitive tune
4) Fuck you... I'm happy.
03-25-2008 | 11:42 AM
#34
Originally Posted by Robert_K
1) There will always be hater
2) Elevation
3) Conservitive tune
4) Fuck you... I'm happy.
2) Elevation
3) Conservitive tune
4) Fuck you... I'm happy.
But, you know what they say... ignorance is bliss...
03-25-2008 | 11:45 AM
#35
We have been over the altitude issue and corrections before, especially with Tim @ SFR. Robert-look up the thread if you wanna know why those numbers are overly inflated. Otherwise have fun quoting impossible numbers. You wouldnt com enear that at sea level SAE corrected. No hating, just educating!
03-25-2008 | 12:36 PM
#36
Originally Posted by Robert_K
1) There will always be hater
2) Elevation
3) Conservitive tune
4) Fuck you... I'm happy.
2) Elevation
3) Conservitive tune
4) Fuck you... I'm happy.
No one is hating..If you wanna say you have 487whp @ 6.5 psi that's fine by me. But let's be honest, that means your car is up there with Alberto's (low boost) @ 6.5 psi Either way, congrats on the newfound power.
Last edited by Tyler4; 03-25-2008 at 12:42 PM.
03-25-2008 | 02:41 PM
#37
Originally Posted by taurran
There's no one "hating" just stating facts based on experience with these motors. 487whp @ 6.5psi is quite frankly impossible on a stock VQ35.
But, you know what they say... ignorance is bliss...
But, you know what they say... ignorance is bliss...
You are 100% right. But I run 12 psi stock block and get 693 rwhp...lol
03-25-2008 | 02:45 PM
#38
Here's the deal, though; 1.22 is the approved dyno correction factor for that dyno, and by approved, I mean it is the one NASA Rocky Mountain uses for all the race classes that require dynos, to include American Iron (a pretty big class here in NASA-RM)
So, yeah, it seems high, and it might very well be high, but there's some sort of method behind it.
So, yeah, it seems high, and it might very well be high, but there's some sort of method behind it.
