Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

JWT 700 Kit Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2008 | 03:02 PM
  #41  
craigo'sznprgrs's Avatar
craigo'sznprgrs
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by vqturbotec
Yes sir
+1

12:1 on a stock block is screaming for trouble, way to lean!
Old 03-25-2008 | 03:06 PM
  #42  
Fluid1's Avatar
Fluid1
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
From: NOPE NOPE NOPE
Default

buh-bye stock motor!

Glad you're happy.
Old 03-25-2008 | 03:06 PM
  #43  
DMK's Avatar
DMK
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
Yeah, the altitude is a ***** here.

As a comparison, mine was 365 uncorrected. Never bothered to see what the corrected number was. So, Rob has the BB700's, and the Cosworth plenum; everything else is more or less the same. Cosworth probably made the biggest difference, considering we were running approx the same boost levels (6.8 on mine, 6.5 on his) I've got the MD spacer and MREV 2, and mine is a revup, whereas his is not.

23 rwhp for the Cosworth is nice! Plus it's all shiny and carbon fibered!
Same boost on different turbo's is the main difference. He has bigger ones which will make more hp at the same boost level.
Old 03-25-2008 | 05:06 PM
  #44  
nomyth46's Avatar
nomyth46
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

what is considered a good a/f on a stock block F/I?.............i was always told11's is optimal on 8:5 to 1 compression F/I's
Old 03-25-2008 | 05:13 PM
  #45  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by nomyth46
what is considered a good a/f on a stock block F/I?.............i was always told11's is optimal on 8:5 to 1 compression F/I's
I'd say 11.3-11.5:1 on a stock motor and 11.5-11.8ish on a built motor.

Each tuner will have their own [reasonable] preference though.
Old 03-25-2008 | 06:26 PM
  #46  
Weqster's Avatar
Weqster
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
Here's the deal, though; 1.22 is the approved dyno correction factor for that dyno, and by approved, I mean it is the one NASA Rocky Mountain uses for all the race classes that require dynos, to include American Iron (a pretty big class here in NASA-RM)

So, yeah, it seems high, and it might very well be high, but there's some sort of method behind it.
Id feel cheated. Dynojets read overinflated as it is, then having a rediculus correction factor added ontop that doesnt even take into account the current climate conditions. All it means is you are competing with more powerful cars. Not cheating anyone but yourself
Old 03-25-2008 | 06:37 PM
  #47  
hr2burn's Avatar
hr2burn
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, Co
Default

For what it's worth Robert, I had a tune on the Dyno-Jet then the Dyna-Pack I think I had like 11 hp difference. Conditions were similar. The corrected thing never goes over well with people that dont live over a mile high, I sort of understand, however it's where we live. Wait til you hit Texas and hit up another dyno...
Congrats!
Sean
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:04 PM
  #48  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Originally Posted by hr2burn
For what it's worth Robert, I had a tune on the Dyno-Jet then the Dyna-Pack I think I had like 11 hp difference. Conditions were similar. The corrected thing never goes over well with people that dont live over a mile high, I sort of understand, however it's where we live. Wait til you hit Texas and hit up another dyno...
Congrats!
Sean
Thanks Sean. Its true those that don't live at elevation don't understand it us that get cheated on HP. Also all car forums are an orgy of idiots. I'm happy and that is all that matters. Maybe if I went to Forged, Performace Factory or other large vendor here it would be different. But I didn't.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:10 PM
  #49  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Thanks Sean. Its true those that don't live at elevation don't understand it us that get cheated on HP. Also all car forums are an orgy of idiots. I'm happy and that is all that matters. Maybe if I went to Forged, Performace Factory or other large vendor here it would be different. But I didn't.
wow, i guess you're still in denial.. ok, i think you might hold the world record for a VQ horsepower per psi record by at least 50whp on a stock motor. great job! also, why is your torque so weak for a turbo? just by looking at the numbers i would have guessed high end vortech setup.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:14 PM
  #50  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Old 03-25-2008 | 07:15 PM
  #51  
Asian Invasian's Avatar
Asian Invasian
Registered User
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Congratz man, sick setup.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:16 PM
  #52  
Abishop's Avatar
Abishop
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Default

congrats man, im glad you go this thing done!
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:23 PM
  #53  
craigo'sznprgrs's Avatar
craigo'sznprgrs
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
I'd say 11.3-11.5:1 on a stock motor and 11.5-11.8ish on a built motor.

Each tuner will have their own [reasonable] preference though.
I agree 100%, some tuners will even run even richer. When I had my turbonetics kit around 9 psi, my tuner had me around 10.5:1 for an added safety net. 11:1 with the twins, and my motor probably owes a big part of its long life to this. 16k miles boosted hard on a stock block.

12:1 is begging for serious issues on a stock block.

On my built engine, I am running 11.7:1 - 11.9:1.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:26 PM
  #54  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Doug:



You know what all you guys are right, I'm full of shit.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:29 PM
  #55  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Doug:

You know what all you guys are right, I'm full of shit.
are you kidding me? what does your car have that i should hate on? please let me know
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:31 PM
  #56  
Abishop's Avatar
Abishop
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Default

Robert, your car is sick, don't worry about what others say mang.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:34 PM
  #57  
craigo'sznprgrs's Avatar
craigo'sznprgrs
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Doug:



You know what all you guys are right, I'm full of shit.

Yes, I am totally confused? I think a fair warning was given, most people who didn't know that 12:1 was WAY to lean for a stock block would probably appreciate this knowledge, before it was too late.

Also, 487 corrected whp, isn't right, it is just wrong even if you were on top of Mount Everest, it's still wrong with the altitude correction! 398 whp is probably about right on. Enjoy your ride, while you can.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:34 PM
  #58  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Thanks Sean. Its true those that don't live at elevation don't understand it us that get cheated on HP. Also all car forums are an orgy of idiots. I'm happy and that is all that matters. Maybe if I went to Forged, Performace Factory or other large vendor here it would be different. But I didn't.
Come on Robert....you are better than that ! You know the rules..."If you post it...they will comment on it". Some will be good and some will be bad, but i have not seen anyone hating on you....not even your buddy Dr Doug Like you said..you are happy with the setup and thats all that matters.

Btw....what up with the A/F in the 12s on your stock motor??
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:43 PM
  #59  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Alright my tuner has tuned hundreds of UTECs. N/A, SC, ST & TT 350Z's. also Evo's, WRX/STi's, and much more in Colorado. I trust him and I'm happy.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:46 PM
  #60  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Alright my tuner has tuned hundreds of UTECs. N/A, SC, ST & TT 350Z's. also Evo's, WRX/STi's, and much more in Colorado. I trust him and I'm happy.
you should ask him to show you the dyno's of all of them with 12.0 AFR


Quick Reply: JWT 700 Kit Results



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:31 AM.