Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Finally 600!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #41  
turismo's Avatar
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
From: curl lookin boy
Default

Originally Posted by doug
maybe on a 3.8 or a 4.2 .. on a 3.5 its questionable
Stroking doesnt give you anymore hp, torque yes. Unless you have the ability to make more torque in the higher rpm, then yes you increase your hp.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 08:52 PM
  #42  
turismo's Avatar
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
From: curl lookin boy
Default

Originally Posted by doug
you always mis-interpret my post.. my post was to others reading the thread, informing that dynopack dyno's read high.. i do that in all dynopack threads not just this one.. and if its a Sharif thread.. i will gladly tell someone that Sharif's dyno reads low..

usually when you have simular mods.. you know boost for boost what the car will put out in a general consensus. Someone else reading this thread may think that all Built Motor Greddy TT's with 3.5's and no meth will do 600 whp with 15 PSI ... which isn't accurate.... again not discreting his numbers.. 600 whp.. is 600 whp.. dyno reads it.. but wanted to clear up that dynopacks read high

Methanol alone does not increase hp. It enables you the ability to.

People have different setups. No two motors or no two tunes are the same. Different altitude, cams, timing, fuel etc... all contribute to the way your motor will perform.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 11:52 PM
  #43  
Cannysage's Avatar
Cannysage
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,374
Likes: 1
From: SO_CAL
Default

Originally Posted by turismo
Stroking doesnt give you anymore hp, torque yes. Unless you have the ability to make more torque in the higher rpm, then yes you increase your hp.
huh? how is that so? bigger liter with lower compression will help you extract more power with much better torque curve I don't see too many 800whp z's on a 3.5.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 12:18 AM
  #44  
mrg1981's Avatar
mrg1981
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 7
From: Mesa, Arizona
Default

Doug- the dyno he used is called a "Dynapack." That's dyn-A-pack. FYI.

Congrats to the OP. Very nice, smooth curve and huge power. Be safe and enjoy. Please post pics and video of your car and also a 1/4 run!
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 05:13 AM
  #45  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by turismo
Stroking doesnt give you anymore hp, torque yes. Unless you have the ability to make more torque in the higher rpm, then yes you increase your hp.
stroking does give more hp.. look at all the 4.2 GTM Dyno's.. cars are putting out close to 100 whp more at the same PSI
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 05:14 AM
  #46  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by turismo
Methanol alone does not increase hp. It enables you the ability to.
I never said Methonal increases HP.. i siad methonal tuned cars can go over 600.. because you can tune more aggresively with methonal


Originally Posted by turismo
People have different setups. No two motors or no two tunes are the same. Different altitude, cams, timing, fuel etc... all contribute to the way your motor will perform.
true.. but all dynopack threads have higher numbers than DJ or DD because Dynopack is measured at the hubs.. not at the wheels
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #47  
turismo's Avatar
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
From: curl lookin boy
Default

Originally Posted by doug
stroking does give more hp.. look at all the 4.2 GTM Dyno's.. cars are putting out close to 100 whp more at the same PSI
Stroking alone will not increase hp. Take an S2K for example. It increase displacement by .2 liters, yet hp remained the same. The reason why it did not increase hp is because of the lower redline.

Increasing displacement increases torque because a greater volume of air (and thus fuel) is combusted per revolution, imparting more force on the crank and thus producing more torque. However, without changing the rest of the setup, you are not actually flowing more total air, so power stays the same. That is why a stroked engine generally pulls the curve to the left and inflates the torque curve (more torque produced accross the RPM band), but doesnt increase HP on a given setup (the ONLY way that would happen would be if the HP curve is still rising at redline, meaning more airflow could be obtained at the same redline by increasing displacement).
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 06:39 AM
  #48  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by turismo
Stroking alone will not increase hp. Take an S2K for example. It increase displacement by .2 liters, yet hp remained the same. The reason why it did not increase hp is because of the lower redline.

Increasing displacement increases torque because a greater volume of air (and thus fuel) is combusted per revolution, imparting more force on the crank and thus producing more torque. However, without changing the rest of the setup, you are not actually flowing more total air, so power stays the same. That is why a stroked engine generally pulls the curve to the left and inflates the torque curve (more torque produced accross the RPM band), but doesnt increase HP on a given setup (the ONLY way that would happen would be if the HP curve is still rising at redline, meaning more airflow could be obtained at the same redline by increasing displacement).
so how do you explain all the 4.2L GTM Dyno's that show drastic HP increase?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 08:18 AM
  #49  
turismo's Avatar
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
From: curl lookin boy
Default

Originally Posted by doug
so how do you explain all the 4.2L GTM Dyno's that show drastic HP increase?

I have not seen a comparison between a stroked 4.2 vs a 3.5 with the same boost levels and turbo kit.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 08:59 AM
  #50  
MMC Racing's Avatar
MMC Racing
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: Chula Vista, CA
Default

Originally Posted by doug
I never said Methonal increases HP.. i siad methonal tuned cars can go over 600.. because you can tune more aggresively with methonal
So can tuning for 105 unleaded race fuel (or higher octane leaded)..
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 09:02 AM
  #51  
MMC Racing's Avatar
MMC Racing
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: Chula Vista, CA
Default

Originally Posted by turismo
I have not seen a comparison between a stroked 4.2 vs a 3.5 with the same boost levels and turbo kit.
Not only that, but what else was done to the car. It could be the same boost level, but the level of head work and exhaust design on the 4.2 could have been superior...

Doug likes to bench race stats instead of pulling from his own experience. He is a true internet master mechanic.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #52  
D350Z10's Avatar
D350Z10
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

Congrats on the power increase, but Doug is right.... Dynopack dynos dont factor in traction and wheel spin.

Go to a dynojet and make a pull.... if you make 600whp then everyone will shut up, but doubt it.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 10:16 AM
  #53  
MMC Racing's Avatar
MMC Racing
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: Chula Vista, CA
Default

Originally Posted by D350Z10
Congrats on the power increase, but Doug is right.... Dynopack dynos dont factor in traction and wheel spin.

Go to a dynojet and make a pull.... if you make 600whp then everyone will shut up, but doubt it.
Doug is right about the other Dynopacks he has read about. He knows zero about the OP's dyno or how it is configured. He had an answer in search of a question.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #54  
mrg1981's Avatar
mrg1981
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 7
From: Mesa, Arizona
Default

I'm almost done with my build and will have it on a Dynapack and a Dynojet. It won't be a perfect comparison, but I'll let you all know what the difference shows on my particular situation.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #55  
MMC Racing's Avatar
MMC Racing
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: Chula Vista, CA
Default

If you read the graph, HP was still climbing. If it was pulled another 250rpm like the compared run, it might have been 610-615.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #56  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Horsepower is a function of torque and engine rpm, so yes if you stroke you will gain torque, and depending on if it holds on the top end, horsepower. That being said, a larger displacement stroked motor will only make more horsepower if the cams, valvetrain, and heads can flow the larger volumes of air and exhaust at higher rpms.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #57  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Congrats Jokestrap..I am happy to hear that you finally have your car back on the road. Enjoy!

Every stroker kit we have ever done...GTM, BC, Evo's...all make plenty more whp AND trq at a given boost level. If you take the stroker to the extreme...then absolutely, you will run out of RPM before you make an increase in whp. But that is not the case with these little strokers.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #58  
Bullitproof's Avatar
Bullitproof
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington De
Default

I took my car to phillydynoworks after getting it tuned at 600whp on a dynapack. i drove the car through center city, strapped the car to the dyno after a 45 minute cool down(which isnt much) and ripped off a 580whp run. thats about a 4 percent loss in power once i bolted up my 19" volks. plus i was running 93 octane and i forgot my tuner had set a 100 octane map which has a slight power increase. bottom line is, dont always believe the hype. this particular dynapack didnt read as low as what people say. congrats on your 600whp number, and if you are looking for some validation on this forum, forget it. no matter how good your intentions are, there are vipers in the FI section ready to **** in your corn flakes.

Last edited by Bullitproof; Jul 27, 2008 at 01:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #59  
tig488's Avatar
tig488
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 0
From: bama
Default

haha^ well put.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #60  
Old School's Avatar
Old School
Shift_Boost
Premier Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,740
Likes: 25
From: On a forum dedicated to Boost
Default

Originally Posted by D350Z10
Congrats on the power increase, but Doug is right.... Dynopack dynos dont factor in traction and wheel spin.

Go to a dynojet and make a pull.... if you make 600whp then everyone will shut up, but doubt it.
Just like anything, dynos require calibration/setup/conditions/etc. These settings dictate readings. You can make a dyno read whatever you want it to by minipulating these settings. So to say one dyno reads lower than the other is incorrect. In a controlled enivornment, all dynos being setup the same, then yes...this would be correct.

So when someone presents a dyno, I take it for what its worth...an instrument in the quest for more power. Whats the use in picking apart the dyno when it could be setup any number of ways.




lol @ internet master mechanic.....doug acts like he's the only that reads the threads around here. lol.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 AM.