Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Impact beam or no over my intercooler?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 04:37 PM
  #1  
specialized5223's Avatar
specialized5223
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 675
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default Impact beam or no over my intercooler?

Just curious. Wondering if you guys kept yours or got rid of it. It looks like it would impede airflow over about 45% of the intercooler.

Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #2  
go-fast's Avatar
go-fast
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: under the hood
Default

Originally Posted by specialized5223
Just curious. Wondering if you guys kept yours or got rid of it. It looks like it would impede airflow over about 45% of the intercooler.

Thanks
it's a matter of preference....do you have kids?wife?will someone miss you?are you lucky?answer these questions and you will have your own personalized answer.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #3  
RandomHer0's Avatar
RandomHer0
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 1
From: Ottawa
Default

I have the Greddy FMIC, no choice in the matter.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #4  
specialized5223's Avatar
specialized5223
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 675
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

So the greddy is too thick i take it?

I was just wondering if you guys thought it did in fact have a noticeable effect on airflow or if it was so negligible that I should keep it on.

I also considered that the part of the intercooler it covered would be covered by the bumper anyway so I'm pretty sure I'll keep it on. Just looking for some logic-based third party input
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

the greddy is not too thick. the intake pipes go in front of the bumper brace mount. you could run a custom 2 in 1 out IC on the greddy and keep the brace. Greddy is the only kit that requires brace removal. APS TT has different routing to keep the brace.

the good aftermarket bumpers dont cover any of the intercooler either.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 06:30 PM
  #6  
350 Rookie's Avatar
350 Rookie
Banned
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire CT
Default

I kept mine. Saftey and towability are your main concerns.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #7  
fstrnldr's Avatar
fstrnldr
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

while i doubt that brace will do much in the average car accident (most 350z's are going to slide right below whatever other vehicle it hits anyway), if you don't have a way to tie the ends of the frame rail together, then i would keep it on. i can see that making a good amount of change in the chassis rigidity. of course i've never tried to measure it w/ and w/out.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 04:56 AM
  #8  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

I notched mine. Still a little bit of support but it allows airflow. I planned on welding a bar over the top of the IC but never got around to it.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 05:20 AM
  #9  
go-fast's Avatar
go-fast
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: under the hood
Default

i know my first post was smart assed,but on a serious note...your cars safety should increase exponentially to your performance mods.the faster you go the more likely you will end up needing every safety feature you have.making power and finding trouble seem to go hand in hand(especially on street tires).
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 06:28 AM
  #10  
specialized5223's Avatar
specialized5223
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 675
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

Thank you everyone. Since I'm on my second stock bumnper t probably is wise to keep the beamn for safety. I also never considered the structural rgidity of the frame. Good call on that one!

And yes I agree safety should be a top factor but I do doubt how much the impact beam would do for me in an accident considering how low my car is and that is usually more often sideways than facing forwards.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 07:12 AM
  #11  
Fluid1's Avatar
Fluid1
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
From: NOPE NOPE NOPE
Default

Don't have mine
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 08:49 AM
  #12  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
Default

I have the Greddy IC....Forged Performance built a custom front brace to replace the stock one. I did not want to lose the structural rigidity up front.

This DOES NOT work like the stock brace to absorb impact....it is only to maintain rigidity.

http://www.cardomain.com/member_page...jpg?013113-265

http://www.cardomain.com/member_page...jpg?441513-265

Last edited by XKR; Oct 7, 2008 at 08:57 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #13  
jining's Avatar
jining
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 1
From: Lynnwood,WA
Default

kept mine, i have my oil cooler and p/s cooler attached to it
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 10:05 AM
  #14  
Old School's Avatar
Old School
Shift_Boost
Premier Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,740
Likes: 25
From: On a forum dedicated to Boost
Default

mines in the garage...
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #15  
terrycs's Avatar
terrycs
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Default

Not using mine (it wouldn't fit anyway).

The impact beam is a thin walled aluminum box beam which I believe is only good for up to 5-10 mph? If mounted correctly, a thick parallel plate FMIC probably is stronger than the stock impact beam when it comes down to a serious accident.

Anything more than 5-10 mph, any FMIC is trashed anyway with or without the stock beam.

As for towing ... don't they tie the car down by the tire(s) these days?

But if the beam doesn't impede performance and can still be used ... why not just install it?

Last edited by terrycs; Oct 7, 2008 at 12:27 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #16  
GTM's Avatar
GTM
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Mine is cut in half, Not worried about it.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #17  
specialized5223's Avatar
specialized5223
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 675
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by terrycs
Not using mine (it wouldn't fit anyway).

But if the beam doesn't impede performance and can still be used ... why not just install it?

I could see it being an effective brace for structural rigidity but if that's not the case, and it doesn't provide any "real" impact protection, then I'd just leave it off for the sake of saving a few pounds up front.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
416blueZ
Wheels & Tires
11
Jun 11, 2024 10:56 AM
aboodi
Forced Induction
8
Oct 28, 2015 02:07 PM
416blueZ
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
5
Sep 24, 2015 02:11 PM
Calinismo350z
Forced Induction
4
Sep 14, 2015 04:04 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:59 PM.