Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

My Vortech 2.87 setup & dyno numbers =)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 08:58 AM
  #21  
Vas@Extended's Avatar
Vas@Extended
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
Default

Originally Posted by frankie945
Great numbers on DD. I bet more fun to drive now
The Z looks great too. Congrats...
Were did you pick up that little nismo sticker on your bumper? that's what I'm missing.
actually, when I got my nismo shift ****, I just cut the writing on the box which was a thick plastic, put some double sided tape, it looks just like the real one =)


Originally Posted by Chef-J
Video for chech boost? Lol
Get a pull from utec man haha u gotta get use to it bro!
haha I know I know
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #22  
Vas@Extended's Avatar
Vas@Extended
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
Default

Originally Posted by s.mckenzie82
Huuum, that's high numbers for your setup. Most people I see usually run around 380-390. Your motor must be a boost *****....LOL What's your A/F looking like? **I'm thinking agressive tune**
MY A/F at wot is around 11.1-11.2
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #23  
s.mckenzie82's Avatar
s.mckenzie82
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by Vas@Extended
MY A/F at wot is around 11.1-11.2
I have a procharger running the same amount of boost, but my car is running a litter fatter then yours; im not sure if that would cause the extra 15-20 extra hp? I guess Vortech SC's just produce more HP.... Lucky you, I had to go the good ol fashon way a throw some boost juice on that bad boy!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 06:31 AM
  #24  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

good deal!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 07:50 AM
  #25  
cc1012's Avatar
cc1012
New Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
Default

from my experience with the shops dyno it does read higher then other DD. Its calibrated to read more like a dynojet.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 12:02 PM
  #26  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

Congrats on your new found power!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 12:18 PM
  #27  
jouvert00's Avatar
jouvert00
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: T&T
Default

Very nice, enjoy.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 06:47 PM
  #28  
tgunsg35's Avatar
tgunsg35
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Nice! Just curious as to how your tq is that much higher then other setups with the 2.87 @ 12 psi?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 07:15 PM
  #29  
Vas@Extended's Avatar
Vas@Extended
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
Default

Iam not sure to be honest. i thought that too. It pulls very very hard. It breaks loose in 3rd with my 285s in the back. Iam going to do a full log in my utec so I can see how much boost etc.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 07:15 PM
  #30  
bd0g36's Avatar
bd0g36
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by tgunsg35
Nice! Just curious as to how your tq is that much higher then other setups with the 2.87 @ 12 psi?

Yes, I have a similar set up and your TQ pwns my TQ please give me ur secret
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:04 PM
  #31  
Chef-J's Avatar
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Default

Originally Posted by bd0g36
Yes, I have a similar set up and your TQ pwns my TQ please give me ur secret
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:09 PM
  #32  
bd0g36's Avatar
bd0g36
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by Chef-J
I put down 364rwhp and 300tq on a DynoDynamics with almost the exact same set up except I have a 5AT and headers. What could be the reason for a 70tq difference?

Chef-J what tq #'s did you put down?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #33  
tylerxfire's Avatar
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 1
From: new york
Default

the tune will make a difference depending on how aggressive and the difference in other mods will make a difference..exhausts, spacers, plenums, etc.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #34  
Chef-J's Avatar
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Default

Originally Posted by bd0g36
I put down 364rwhp and 300tq on a DynoDynamics with almost the exact same set up except I have a 5AT and headers. What could be the reason for a 70tq difference?

Chef-J what tq #'s did you put down?
Because you have SSV, and we don't have! that's diff!! J/k

399 whp and 340TQ(?) ( dyno dynamic), there is dyno sheet somewhere on this section. I feel like dave's dyno read lower than any other dyno dynamic.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:35 PM
  #35  
bd0g36's Avatar
bd0g36
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by Chef-J
Because you have SSV, and we don't have! that's diff!! J/k

399 whp and 340TQ(?) ( dyno dynamic), there is dyno sheet somewhere on this section. I feel like dave's dyno read lower than any other dyno dynamic.

LOL, the Kinetix actually didn't change the tq #'s much at all. Peak tq was 300 with and without. And yeah, Dave's dyno makes it hard to brag on the forums when other people are talking about putting down crazy #'s with their vortechs. And I am very impressed if you put down 399 and 340 on Dave's Dreamkiller
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 10:01 PM
  #36  
Chef-J's Avatar
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Default

Originally Posted by bd0g36
LOL, the Kinetix actually didn't change the tq #'s much at all. Peak tq was 300 with and without. And yeah, Dave's dyno makes it hard to brag on the forums when other people are talking about putting down crazy #'s with their vortechs. And I am very impressed if you put down 399 and 340 on Dave's Dreamkiller

If you not happy with your numbers, you can go to other shop dyno and do it. You sounds like you making a super #'s, it's just got low number's because dave's dyno.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 03:07 AM
  #37  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by Vas@Extended
Iam not sure to be honest. i thought that too. It pulls very very hard. It breaks loose in 3rd with my 285s in the back. Iam going to do a full log in my utec so I can see how much boost etc.
My car did the same thing in 3rd gear with my 275's when I was at 414whp/355TQ. I didn't have any power drop off up top though and some different mods than you hence the torque difference. I would be intrested in how much boost you made this power at.

Just speaking of power drop off in the high end, I did some more crazy modifications to the stock intake manifold this year to make it even better. This was mainly driven by the results I got last year with some of the minor modifications and how my car pulled all the way to redline.

In for boost results.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 05:53 AM
  #38  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

hmm, you guys need an alignment. i have 460/400 on a dynodynamics and it doesnt break loose beside 1st gear, or maybe 2nd at the track.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 06:22 AM
  #39  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
hmm, you guys need an alignment. i have 460/400 on a dynodynamics and it doesnt break loose beside 1st gear, or maybe 2nd at the track.
Not a bad idea.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 01:47 PM
  #40  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by bd0g36
I put down 364rwhp and 300tq on a DynoDynamics with almost the exact same set up except I have a 5AT and headers. What could be the reason for a 70tq difference?
do you have test pipes? cats change exhaust flow quite a bit. Also, do you have full exhaust all the way back? What about intake mods?

You have an automatic transmission, that eats up quite a bit of power in the driveline.


Originally Posted by str8dum1
hmm, you guys need an alignment. i have 460/400 on a dynodynamics and it doesnt break loose beside 1st gear, or maybe 2nd at the track.
what is your alignment numbers? Mine is setup by a performance shop and handles great but i break loose with 275's in 3rd easily. Brand new falken tires too. I know they aren't the "best" brand based on what everyone here uses, but they get pretty good traction. Barely broke loose in 1st gear before supercharger and mods.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:59 AM.