Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Kinetix Velocity Manifold + Vortech Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2009, 12:22 PM
  #1  
bd0g36
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bd0g36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Kinetix Velocity Manifold + Vortech Numbers

Just had the new Kinetix Velocity Manifold installed and tuned. Below is the Dyno Graph. The red line is the previous dyno, the blue is with the Kinetix.

The old tune was 351rwhp, the new one is 363.7rwhp, so the kinetix gained me 12.7rwhp.

The tunes took place on the same dyno with the same tuner under similar conditions with about 9 months in between.

The first tune was also with 19" Oem Rays, the second was with 20" Enkei L-SR wheels. It is documented that larger wheels hurt dyno numbers, so I think the mid range gains may have been more with the old wheels on. I can definitely feel the difference in the mid-low range now. I haven't had a chance to really open her up yet.



My tuner, Dave, suggested that I could see much larger gains if I raised the redline because up top is really where the Kinetix makes gains.
Old 07-07-2009, 12:38 PM
  #2  
Chomorro
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Chomorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is this the kinetix SSV plenum or Kinetix Plenum V+
Old 07-07-2009, 12:46 PM
  #3  
bd0g36
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bd0g36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chomorro
Is this the kinetix SSV plenum or Kinetix Plenum V+
It is the new version of the SSV called the Velocity Manifold

http://www.kinetixracing.com/new-ssv...zg3503-06.aspx

Other observations, I have noticed the sound is really nice, it looks really sharp, and I can really feel a difference off the line.
Old 07-07-2009, 01:31 PM
  #4  
ADMAN
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
ADMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SIN CITY
Posts: 1,705
Received 101 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Good. I thought the old one actually loss HP for most people?
Old 07-07-2009, 01:37 PM
  #5  
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Nexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 13,654
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

notice the drop off on the red power curve after 6500rpm as opposed to the new blue like that keeps climbing. that is exactly what you are looking for in a manifold for a DE motor. good stuff. now at least i have some choices, cosworth or this.
Old 07-07-2009, 02:39 PM
  #6  
Motormouth
Banned
iTrader: (44)
 
Motormouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: not here
Posts: 20,190
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I love how their site still claims 30whp gains for this piece of ****.

No one should support a completely exploitative company like Kinetix. They have put out sub par products for too long and stolen people's money with false claims to have a meager gain matter just because - finally - they aren't losing power with their design.

do not support this company, especially at the price point they are raping you for.
Old 07-07-2009, 02:43 PM
  #7  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

just a question, were you running any sort of spacer prior to the switch?
Old 07-07-2009, 02:51 PM
  #8  
Mike Wazowski
350Z-holic
iTrader: (113)
 
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego 92111
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Motormouth
I love how their site still claims 30whp gains for this piece of ****.

No one should support a completely exploitative company like Kinetix. They have put out sub par products for too long and stolen people's money with false claims to have a meager gain matter just because - finally - they aren't losing power with their design.

do not support this company, especially at the price point they are raping you for.
I will agree with this. After seeing some of the crap that kinetix has put out, I would spend a little more for the cosworth.

If you like it though, that is all that matters.
Old 07-07-2009, 03:01 PM
  #9  
Motormouth
Banned
iTrader: (44)
 
Motormouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: not here
Posts: 20,190
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by armt350z
just a question, were you running any sort of spacer prior to the switch?
and was there tuning after switching plenums? a 9 month window is not a good differential indicator to be honest. same day is generally accepted.

Last edited by Motormouth; 07-07-2009 at 03:02 PM.
Old 07-07-2009, 03:45 PM
  #10  
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
tylerxfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i think this gave great gains and something i may look into...power keeps climbing nicely
Old 07-07-2009, 03:59 PM
  #11  
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
iTrader: (58)
 
Chef-J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

First dyno was without spacer? Or with spacer?

Imo, if that dyno was compare with spacer, it is pretty interesting.
Old 07-07-2009, 04:22 PM
  #12  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I wouldn't touch a kinetix product with a ten foot pole. Their products are garbage and I litterly laugh when some opens their hood and the kinetix plenum is looking back at me.

Complete garbage.

edit:
looking at the curves. I would have to think the loss in HP and TQ between 5500 and 6000 rpms would be more noticable than the gain you see at the top end.?.?

Last edited by Zivman; 07-07-2009 at 04:25 PM.
Old 07-07-2009, 04:49 PM
  #13  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

FWIW, on the same dyno, same pull session, I saw +-7 hp or so. Those 2 curves could easily be close to the noise of the dyno. October vs July weather could make up the rest of the difference.

Also, a more aggressive tune could easily make 12 hp on the top end just by bumping the timing .5-1 degree.

I would jump to any conclusions yet.

regardless, thats a nice curve

Last edited by str8dum1; 07-07-2009 at 04:52 PM.
Old 07-07-2009, 06:29 PM
  #14  
bd0g36
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bd0g36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also note that in between tunes, I added 20 inch wheels. http://g35driver.com/forums/tuner-dy...rims-dyno.html

Based on the results in the thread above, the wheels could be responsible for a significant power loss before I added the Kinetix.

My experience validates that. One I put on the 20's I really felt a big loss, especially between 2000-4500 rpms. Now it feels much stronger than when I added the wheels.

Also, I did NOT have a spacer for the first tune, the plenum was stock. The first tune was done in very similar weather conditions, about 80 degrees at night.

I know that this is not a strictly scientific study, and with variables like time between tunes and larger wheels for the second tune, you should take the results with a grain of salt. But seeing as how these are the only before/after results available right now (I've searched), I thought they were not bad.

My tuner said that he has had problems with the Crawford and FI, and that with the what he learned doing this tune, he would recommend the Kinetix to FI people for the gains up top where most DE engines fall flat. He also said that if I did a flash to raise the redline I would see even more gains.

For those who think it is complete garbage, it is very well made, and my butt dyno sure appreciates the added performance after what was lost with the new wheels. I really feel a huge difference down low.
Old 07-07-2009, 06:54 PM
  #15  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

that dyno assumes you have a significant increase in wheel weight as well, as in up to 15-20 pounds per corner. Did you out on some 20" chrome rims? Of course you didnt, so there is no reason to think they dyno would be any different.

That wheel data is very skewed. Throw on some decent forged 20"s and i bet there will be no discernible difference. Hydrazine knew its was an extreme case, but thats the only way to show a difference.
Old 07-07-2009, 06:56 PM
  #16  
bd0g36
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bd0g36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
that dyno assumes you have a significant increase in wheel weight as well, as in up to 15-20 pounds per corner. Did you out on some 20" chrome rims? Of course you didnt, so there is no reason to think they dyno would be any different.

That wheel data is very skewed. Throw on some decent forged 20"s and i bet there will be no discernible difference. Hydrazine knew its was an extreme case, but thats the only way to show a difference.
You're assuming that I threw on a decent set of forged 20's... My wheels were $250 per wheel lol

I really didn't think they would make much difference, that is, until I drove around with the new wheels and was like "WTF, I need more power to offset the crappy wheels"

Last edited by bd0g36; 07-07-2009 at 06:58 PM.
Old 07-07-2009, 07:07 PM
  #17  
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
tylerxfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

20's on a z..ugh
Old 07-07-2009, 07:11 PM
  #18  
bd0g36
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bd0g36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tylerxfire
20's on a z..ugh
It's a G homie

Here she is with those aforementioned 20's




Last edited by bd0g36; 07-07-2009 at 07:13 PM.
Old 07-07-2009, 07:15 PM
  #19  
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
doug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 16,838
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

the numbers look the same except at the upper RPM's.. where it looks on the first dyno they let off
Old 07-07-2009, 07:22 PM
  #20  
bd0g36
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bd0g36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by doug
the numbers look the same except at the upper RPM's.. where it looks on the first dyno they let off
Maybe, but my tuner said the gains were legit. And I really can feel the difference down low. All in all I don't know if it was worth the $$, maybe if I increased the redline to get at those high rpm gains it would be. I dunno, driving around this evening I swear I could feel a difference pulling from stoplights and between 2500-4500 rpms.

And the sound is really great.

Has anyone else dyno'd this Kinetix yet?


Quick Reply: Kinetix Velocity Manifold + Vortech Numbers



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 AM.