Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Confusion regarding T25, T3 and T4 turbine flanges

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 07:01 PM
  #1  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Thread Starter
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default Confusion regarding T25, T3 and T4 turbine flanges

People are putting way too much emphasis on the size of the turbine flange (i.e., T25, T3, T4, etc.) without putting any consideration into the structures before and after the flange... The flange is only a connection point... that's it.

The flange sits a couple of inches from the turbine inlet, and the exhaust gases being passed through the flange need to be channeled into the turbine inlet.

If the flange is 3X the area if the turbine inlet, what happens to the exhaust gasses when they get to the inlet. Well, for the most part, they hit a heavy restriction. Now, if the flange is 1.5X the area of the turbine inlet, over the distance of a couple of inches, there is a better opportunity to direct the exhaust flow. Fluid flows respond better to gradual transitions than they do to sharp transitions.

Now, with a header style manifold, you will need a T3 or T4 flange because you are pulling 3 large pipes into one at the collector, and you do not want that transition to be too sharp.

Finally, good luck trying to get a turbo that mates to a T3 or T4 flange on a log style manifold to fit inside the engine bays of our cars.

EDIT: I edited this to make it more brief and directly to the point.

Last edited by ttg35fort; Oct 11, 2009 at 08:54 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #2  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Thread Starter
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

I am open to discussions relating to this subject, but PLEASE do not respond with an "I think..." comment that has absolutley no data or scientific analysis to back it up...

I have fully analysed this subject. I always appreciate contradictary opinions when they are based on fact and/or a true scientific analysis. Unless you have facts or a strong scientific analysis to present, then please refrain from posting. If, however, you are well experienced in thiis area and you see something that I either am overlooking or in which I am incorrect in my interpretation, please post and open it up for discussion.

Last edited by ttg35fort; Oct 9, 2009 at 07:51 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #3  
SmallTuner's Avatar
SmallTuner
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
From: kuwait
Default

ok .. still no one cares about this or what ???

they dont care about us
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2009 | 03:00 PM
  #4  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

What is this threads purpose? Different strokes for different folks. If your track oriented then a t25 would be the best option, but when going for serious power you will not find anyone that recommends it over a t3 or t4.

Last edited by thawk408; Oct 11, 2009 at 01:43 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2009 | 09:01 PM
  #5  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Thread Starter
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by ttg35fort
but PLEASE do not respond with an "I think..." comment that has absolutley no data or scientific analysis to back it up...
Originally Posted by thawk408
I dont think....
FAIL.

Last edited by ttg35fort; Oct 11, 2009 at 08:56 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 11:11 AM
  #6  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

Terry,
Stop using Science and logic and just bolt stuff up lol jk



tom

Last edited by thom000001; Oct 11, 2009 at 11:13 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 11:21 AM
  #7  
Cass007's Avatar
Cass007
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,419
Likes: 2
From: In teh Mid-A
Default

Me likey - there is a lot of win going on in that pic Tom.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 11:27 AM
  #8  
GT-ER's Avatar
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by thom000001
Terry,
Stop using Science and logic and just bolt stuff up lol jk



tom
Oh look...a T3 flange...I think you are making a mistake running a T3 setup. I'll help you out, send it over to me and I'll dispose of it.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 11:45 AM
  #9  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

lol

Originally Posted by GT-ER
Oh look...a T3 flange...I think you are making a mistake running a T3 setup. I'll help you out, send it over to me and I'll dispose of it.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #10  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by ttg35fort
FAIL.
Then entire thread is fail. Ill edit my post

You will NOT FIND anyone that recommends t25 for big power.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #11  
SmallTuner's Avatar
SmallTuner
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
From: kuwait
Default

eheheehehe oh no u guys should stop doing this

lats wait for XKRs car and see, after that, its another story
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #12  
GT-ER's Avatar
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
Then entire thread is fail. Ill edit my post

You will NOT FIND anyone that recommends t25 for big power.
Depends what your definition of big power is. I don't see a T25 flange/housing being too restrictive up to about 700-800whp...after that I would agree that T3 is the way to go up to maybe 1200-1400whp or so. Heck, I got almost 400whp ( 378whp to be exact ) out of a GT2871R with a T25 housing ( small .64 A/R to boot ) on an otherwise stock 1.8L 4 cyl. Getting twice that out of TWO GT3071R's with .86 T25 housings should be no problem. Then again....I'd shoot at those numbers with T3 housings simply because their is no doubt that they can flow more and there are more options as far as housings go ( gotta love those smooth GT housing ).

Oh no...we just got on topic....nooooooooooooooooo....

Last edited by GT-ER; Oct 11, 2009 at 06:21 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 08:04 PM
  #13  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
Depends what your definition of big power is. I don't see a T25 flange/housing being too restrictive up to about 700-800whp...after that I would agree that T3 is the way to go up to maybe 1200-1400whp or so. Heck, I got almost 400whp ( 378whp to be exact ) out of a GT2871R with a T25 housing ( small .64 A/R to boot ) on an otherwise stock 1.8L 4 cyl. Getting twice that out of TWO GT3071R's with .86 T25 housings should be no problem. Then again....I'd shoot at those numbers with T3 housings simply because their is no doubt that they can flow more and there are more options as far as housings go ( gotta love those smooth GT housing ).

Oh no...we just got on topic....nooooooooooooooooo....
I dont consider 700-800whp big power.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #14  
GT-ER's Avatar
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
I dont consider 700-800whp big power.
Damn...I really need to get out more often...lol.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 09:42 PM
  #15  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
Damn...I really need to get out more often...lol.
No doubt it would be a fast car tho. Guess I have higher expectations then most.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 06:47 AM
  #16  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Thread Starter
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by thom000001
Terry,
Stop using Science and logic and just bolt stuff up lol jk



tom
With THOSE exhaust manifolds, then the T3/T4 flanges make sense.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 07:04 AM
  #17  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Thread Starter
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Does anyone even make a log style manifold for a VQ motor that has T3 flanges?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #18  
GT-ER's Avatar
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by ttg35fort
Does anyone even make a log style manifold for a VQ motor that has T3 flanges?
I think GTM does for their GT35R kits ( and maybe GT30 kit? ).
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 07:08 AM
  #19  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Thread Starter
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
I think GTM does for their GT35R kits ( and maybe GT30 kit? ).
No, those are T25 flanges. GTM uses the same manifold set for all of it's turbo kits.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 07:12 AM
  #20  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
Default

WOW Tom....nice looking setup.....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:41 AM.