Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

My Boosted Performance Single Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 12:42 PM
  #21  
skakemokid's Avatar
skakemokid
Registered User
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 460
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
Default

Well that, and its a really conservative tune like he said...
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #22  
tylerxfire's Avatar
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 1
From: new york
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
Read post # 17.

When I did my spring pressure run with a 7psi spring, my boost at red line was just under 5psi. You need a boost controller to keep the w/g closed/cycling in the higher RPM range.

EDIT:

Have a look at the dyno that Vas posted. 8.5 psi and 415whp 402wtq. This is why I don't like comparing numbers, the dyno is a tool.
i did read it, and still stand by my statement like i said

what size turbo is this in the bp kit that is dyno'd here?...also why does it have such a hard time holding boost to redline, too small of a turbo? and requires a boost controller, not all the kits are dropping off like that...
yes i agree a dyno is a tool for tuning but still gives an idea of what these kits make and how they differ...also seems that the power comes in late by the look of this dyno

what ever happened to the built motor car that was getting the bigger bp kit put on?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 02:21 PM
  #23  
zmedic16's Avatar
zmedic16
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: bronx new york
Default

lol @ the powerlab guys trying to downtalk. cant blame you if your kit is limited to 500whp or so on pump. so much for that gt35r and thinking it will make 600whp on a built setup. dont downtalk other kits untill you really look and understand your own setup.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 02:29 PM
  #24  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by tylerxfire
i did read it, and still stand by my statement like i said

what size turbo is this in the bp kit that is dyno'd here?
It is a Precision Billet T4 6262E .58a/r. So the turbo is larger than the GT35r, and will support more power if one was to build the motor, and go for more.


Originally Posted by tylerxfire
...also why does it have such a hard time holding boost to redline, too small of a turbo? and requires a boost controller, not all the kits are dropping off like that...
No, the turbo is more than big enough. I explained the boost thing already, as back pressure plays a big role.



Originally Posted by tylerxfire
yes i agree a dyno is a tool for tuning but still gives an idea of what these kits make and how they differ...also seems that the power comes in late by the look of this dyno
With a turbo set up timing will play a very big role in power deliver and spool. I gained 24whp at 4000rpm just by increasing timing. Also this is a JB turbo, and not a BB like the PL kit. That is a difference of about 300-400rpm in spool as well.

Here is the same kit on another car, this dyno is on a stock DE not a Rev-up like to OP to boot:

https://my350z.com/forum/forced-indu...nd-review.html

Originally Posted by tylerxfire
what ever happened to the built motor car that was getting the bigger bp kit put on?
Look for results on Saturday August 28th


BTW if you want to compare the kits you should also mention that this kit (with more potential) is $1500 cheaper. Just thought I throw that out there. It also has the option of a 67mm turbo, and guess what, you can put an air filter on it.

Last edited by Boosted Performance; Aug 23, 2010 at 02:42 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 03:17 PM
  #25  
Vas_Z33's Avatar
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 25
From: westchester NY
Default

Op needs to post more info.. like exhaust setup..what other mods he has done to the motor etc etc. Either way it is still fun as hell.. like OP stated .. it is also very conservative. As long as he is happy thats all there is to it really.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 03:29 PM
  #26  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

for guys that are building their motors, like the OP and Vas, why wouldnt you spec a bigger hotside?

OP can you put #'s to what you define as conservative. Low HP does not always mean conservative.

Last edited by str8dum1; Aug 23, 2010 at 03:30 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 03:55 PM
  #27  
thatv35guy's Avatar
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 59
From: Gilbert, AZ
Smile

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
Look for results on Saturday August 28th

BTW if you want to compare the kits you should also mention that this kit (with more potential) is $1500 cheaper. Just thought I throw that out there. It also has the option of a 67mm turbo, and guess what, you can put an air filter on it.
I’m just curious, as of today, what’s the highest horsepower car utilizing your turbo kit? And what’s the fastest 1/4 pass that a Z car equipped with the Boosted Performance kit has made?

I haven’t seen anyone else with the BP kit in action yet, so I’m just wondering if anyone else has posted any other times and numbers. I know, I saw u post that u ran a 13.4 @ 113 with a 2.37 60’ with just over 400 whp on 8 psi.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 04:13 PM
  #28  
2004Black350z's Avatar
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
Premier Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,097
Likes: 17
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by thatv35guy
I’m just curious, as of today, what’s the highest horsepower car utilizing your turbo kit? And what’s the fastest 1/4 pass that a Z car equipped with the Boosted Performance kit has made?

I haven’t seen anyone else with the BP kit in action yet, so I’m just wondering if anyone else has posted any other times and numbers. I know, I saw u post that u ran a 13.4 @ 113 with a 2.37 60’ with just over 400 whp on 8 psi.
what r u running?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #29  
zmedic16's Avatar
zmedic16
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: bronx new york
Default

^+1
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #30  
thatv35guy's Avatar
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 59
From: Gilbert, AZ
Smile

Originally Posted by 2004Black350z
what r u running?
Idk, I’ll be heading to the strip for the first time with boost this Saturday if everything goes according to plan. So, we’ll find out then, lol…
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #31  
tylerxfire's Avatar
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 1
From: new york
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
It is a Precision Billet T4 6262E .58a/r. So the turbo is larger than the GT35r, and will support more power if one was to build the motor, and go for more.




No, the turbo is more than big enough. I explained the boost thing already, as back pressure plays a big role.





With a turbo set up timing will play a very big role in power deliver and spool. I gained 24whp at 4000rpm just by increasing timing. Also this is a JB turbo, and not a BB like the PL kit. That is a difference of about 300-400rpm in spool as well.

Here is the same kit on another car, this dyno is on a stock DE not a Rev-up like to OP to boot:

https://my350z.com/forum/forced-indu...nd-review.html



Look for results on Saturday August 28th


BTW if you want to compare the kits you should also mention that this kit (with more potential) is $1500 cheaper. Just thought I throw that out there. It also has the option of a 67mm turbo, and guess what, you can put an air filter on it.


thank you for the response..i am doing more research on the turbo side of things and your kit is priced very nice but i will be going at it with a built motor so we shall see i guess...
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 04:44 PM
  #32  
tylerxfire's Avatar
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 1
From: new york
Default

yeah op..whats the full setup..injectors, pump, exhaust and all?

are you or have you thrown any codes? just curious
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #33  
biggersNISMO's Avatar
biggersNISMO
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: South Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by 350XTCz
Gotta find my camera. It is packed away from my move back to Colorado. I'll find it ASAP
If you ever have the Z out here in Colorado, I'd love to check it out.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #34  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
for guys that are building their motors, like the OP and Vas, why wouldnt you spec a bigger hotside?

OP can you put #'s to what you define as conservative. Low HP does not always mean conservative.
Everybody with a stock block wants to hit 400/400 as early as possible. The standard kit is speced for the stock block. It is easy to upgrade the hot side or go up to a 67mm turbo if needed.

Originally Posted by thatv35guy
I’m just curious, as of today, what’s the highest horsepower car utilizing your turbo kit? And what’s the fastest 1/4 pass that a Z car equipped with the Boosted Performance kit has made?
I am not sure how this is relevant. If you can make 420whp, why would you not be able to make 550whp? When the dyno with the 67mm turbo comes in on Saturday I am sure the numbers will be up there with all the other "big power" kits. I know this kit inside out, and know what the potential is.


Originally Posted by tylerxfire
thank you for the response..i am doing more research on the turbo side of things and your kit is priced very nice but i will be going at it with a built motor so we shall see i guess...


It costs only $250 to upgrade from the 62mm turbo to the 67mm turbo.

Last edited by Boosted Performance; Aug 23, 2010 at 07:59 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:28 PM
  #35  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by thatv35guy
I’m just curious, as of today, what’s the highest horsepower car utilizing your turbo kit? And what’s the fastest 1/4 pass that a Z car equipped with the Boosted Performance kit has made?

I haven’t seen anyone else with the BP kit in action yet, so I’m just wondering if anyone else has posted any other times and numbers. I know, I saw u post that u ran a 13.4 @ 113 with a 2.37 60’ with just over 400 whp on 8 psi.

i have the 67mm.

I put down 451 on injected's dd which would be just slightly over 500 hp on a DJ setup with my vortech. That being said, I have my 67 street tuned with timing pulled way back on 13psi. I've posted my boost logs to see when the turbo spools. 13psi is around 4100 rpms.

I just got back from some street races. My friend's build camaro used to smoke my vortech hands down. He runs mid 11's in his camaro. Tonight i owned him by a car length with only 13 psi untuned.

Saturday on e85 this thing is going to be a beast. It gets up and moves as it is now.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #36  
350XTCz's Avatar
350XTCz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by tylerxfire
yeah op..whats the full setup..injectors, pump, exhaust and all?

are you or have you thrown any codes? just curious
Sorry! Totally forgot to add this stuff.

Precision T4 6262 Turbo
Turbo XS UTEC
Greddy Ti-C Single Exhaust
Walbro 255
550cc injectors

Looking to swap out the UTEC for Haltech later down the road.
Hopefully I will have enough money for my engine build and tune later this year, or early next year.

No codes thrown, but I still have my Non-foulers from my test pipes on my 02 sensors.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #37  
2004Black350z's Avatar
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
Premier Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,097
Likes: 17
From: NC
Default

cant fcking WAIT binder
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #38  
350XTCz's Avatar
350XTCz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by biggersNISMO
If you ever have the Z out here in Colorado, I'd love to check it out.
I'll let you know if it makes its way out here. Hopefully soon! I miss driving the Z.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:48 PM
  #39  
350XTCz's Avatar
350XTCz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
for guys that are building their motors, like the OP and Vas, why wouldnt you spec a bigger hotside?

OP can you put #'s to what you define as conservative. Low HP does not always mean conservative.

I don't remember the exact numbers. I would have to go back and look at my data logs and the utec map. Problem is, my car is not here yet.

I'll let you know as soon as I get it out here.

As far as opting for a bigger hotside, I figured I could always upgrade later down the road. Besides, I don't want ridiculous power. Maybe shooting for 500-550 whp (Ya, I guess that is ridiculous still) in the future.

For now, I am very very content with the car's driveability and power.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 10:58 PM
  #40  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

ya, getting to 500 on our cars requires a huge jump in cost for that built block.


chaning that hoside shouldn't be an issue though. I wouldn't worry about it. Streetability and spool time is great on that 6262. You aren't even touching that stock block yet so i'd do that before thinking about built block. You can have a lot of fun on just a stock block.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 PM.