Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

SP Boost Actuated Exhaust Cut-Out for my Greddy EVO TT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 10:45 AM
  #1  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default SP Boost Actuated Exhaust Cut-Out for my Greddy EVO TT

While visiting SP this week, I decided to take advantage of some of their innovations and went with the Boost Actuated Exhaust Cut-out. My original intent was to install the pair. Due to time constraints and to make life simpler for all, rather than attempt to remove the downpipes on the Greddy Kit (PITA), we opted to install a single dump in between the 1st set of behind the cat pipes seen below:
***(I apologize for any blurry pics, only had my cell phone)***

Before Shots:




After:




First came assembling the actual 3" cut-out with the necessary down facing tip:


Then some more fab work:



Test fitting (Tacked it up):



Then final welding run the boost line and voila:



Done.

I utilized this set-up to counteract the anticipated hp losses I would incur by going with the Cosworth intake. Worked out pretty well. No overall power losses than previous set-up.

Last edited by rrmedicx; Aug 27, 2010 at 02:17 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 10:49 AM
  #2  
zmedic16's Avatar
zmedic16
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: bronx new york
Default

awesome work.

Last edited by zmedic16; Aug 27, 2010 at 10:54 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 10:58 AM
  #3  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Nicely done. You can now run just about any (restrictive) exhaust and not have it make a bit of difference to your power curve.

Last edited by rcdash; Aug 27, 2010 at 10:59 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #4  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

Thats right! And if down the line I change turbo set-ups, I can still retain the benefit of the cutouts. Or if I sell the exhaust, someone will gain an awesome set-up built right in.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:07 AM
  #5  
can'tZme's Avatar
can'tZme
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: Harrodsburg, KY
Default

That looks awesome
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #6  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

wait... you anticipated loss in hp with the cossy? thats not what i wanted to hear before i installed mine.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:21 AM
  #7  
hellsoldiers08's Avatar
hellsoldiers08
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: san antonio,tx
Default

I want a video
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:22 AM
  #8  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
wait... you anticipated loss in hp with the cossy? thats not what i wanted to hear before i installed mine.
Yes. Its not a very FI Friendly manifold for the larger set-ups. For your basic 400 hp stock block stuff its fine, but based on my discussions with Larry, you can see rwhp losses of anywhere from 30-60 hp, depending on your set-up. That basically sealed in my decision for the exhaust cut-out...Larry can tell you, I've been hounding him for the cut-outs since my last trip there.

And the best part about the cut-out, is that it requires NO RE-TUNING!!!!

You heard me right, no re-tuning is required. So if anyone wants to make a quick 30-50 rwhp get the cut-out from SP and have it welded up anyway you can for some cheap hp.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #9  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by hellsoldiers08
I want a video
Yeah me to. Shot plenty with Reid's vid camera while he was out of the shop. Hopefully he can upload something soon. You will se a test video we shot with me giving the car some gas and Larry connecting the boost hose to hear the difference of the cut-out on and off. Pretty cool.

And its not ridiculous either. Sound is ground shaking though. Deep Grumble!
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:28 AM
  #10  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

When I dyno'd my Cosworth I lost midrange torque, but it picked up above 6000 rpms, just like all the other dynos I've seen (this is compared to a Crawford).

Lots of variables (ignore the comments, both are at 15 psi open loop boost control with no meth), but this type of dyno seems consistent:



So Randy, I think you do lose peak torque, but gain peak whp with the Cosworth, and a flatter torque curve...

Last edited by rcdash; Aug 27, 2010 at 11:45 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #11  
SoundPerformance's Avatar
SoundPerformance
Sponsor
Sound Performance
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 1
From: Bloomingdale, IL
Default

I know a few people that have tested the Cosworth back to back against the stock intake and have all lost HP, one NA - 16 rwhp and one FI - 50 rwhp. On Randy's car I had to take out fuel almost everywhere and a ton above 7000 where it just didnt want to move much air at all. Id keep the stock one with a spacer or just get the CJ one. The CJ is the only one that I can personally say will give you huge gains!!
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #12  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

I would have been happy to be your test mule on that CJ Manifold Theory Larry. LOL
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:42 AM
  #13  
SoundPerformance's Avatar
SoundPerformance
Sponsor
Sound Performance
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 1
From: Bloomingdale, IL
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
When I dyno'd my Cosworth I lost a little midrange, but it picked up above 6300 rpms, just like all the other dynos I've seen (this is compared to a Crawford).

Lots of variables (ignore the comments, both are at 15 psi open loop boost control with no meth), but this type of dyno seems consistent:



Looks like you may have picked up 5 rwhp but lost 20 ft lbs or torque!! Not a good upgrade!!
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:43 AM
  #14  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

HA, I called it
looks like excellent idea to avoid using 2 of those 350$ valves! very nice!
so they felt confident that 1 3" dump was enough ,or is that twin 3" pipes to a 4" dump. That would be excellent

Pretty odd that you didnt need a retune based on the advertising dynos that SP uses. There's no way they gained that much power without retuning the car. An extra 50+hp is not a trivial amount of gas because you are tuning in different cells since the boost curve is different

Just curious to as why you dont sell your cossy if your are losing power with it? Too bad Charles wont make his mani with the side mount TB.

on a side note, you said you had to take out fuel. What was the % ETOH in the gas compared to last time? I know the ProEFi is supposed to interpolate, but if the base tunes on either end used different amounts of ETOH, then of course you had to change the fuel table to get the proper interpolation.

Last edited by str8dum1; Aug 27, 2010 at 11:50 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:51 AM
  #15  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by SoundPerformance
Looks like you may have picked up 5 rwhp but lost 20 ft lbs or torque!! Not a good upgrade!!
Well, unless you're looking for a flatter torque curve... Spinning street tires at peak torque is no fun either. I agree, it's not a "good" upgrade compared to an typical aftermarket setup (spacer+non revup or APS or Crawford). Wish there was something better...
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #16  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
HA, I called it
looks like excellent idea to avoid using 2 of those 350$ valves! very nice!
so they felt confident that 1 3" dump was enough ,or is that twin 3" pipes to a 4" dump. That would be excellent

2x2.5 inch pipes into 1x3" dump

Pretty odd that you didnt need a retune based on the advertising dynos that SP uses. There's no way they gained that much power without retuning the car. An extra 50+hp is not a trivial amount of gas because you are tuning in different cells since the boost curve is different

We had to re-tune for the Cosworth, not so much for the Exhaust cutout. Larry can confirm.

Just curious to as why you dont sell your cossy if your are losing power with it? Too bad Charles wont make his mani with the side mount TB.

I need it to close my hood. It sits nice and low. With the Cosworth spacer to clear the taller injectors, The crawford was simply too tall. Got rid of my stock plenum many moons ago. And the Cossy is just plain baller. Enough said.

on a side note, you said you had to take out fuel. What was the % ETOH in the gas compared to last time? I know the ProEFi is supposed to interpolate, but if the base tunes on either end used different amounts of ETOH, then of course you had to change the fuel table to get the proper interpolation.
I had about 3 gallons of 93 pump and added 10 gallons of E-85. I wasn't in the car so I don't know the actual %. Larry can advise.

Last edited by rrmedicx; Aug 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 12:01 PM
  #17  
IslandZavage's Avatar
IslandZavage
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: South FLA
Default

congrats... Looks nice.. Now theres something else i want too add.......
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 12:11 PM
  #18  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

Thanks for the response!

The cossy is definitely a pretty piece! If you ever change injectors you can go with the short 40ish millimeter Injector dynamics and go back to any plenum you want.

so many neat changes that havent been really document before. Hopefully you guys have boost charts from the initial tune /after cutout as well.

I would guess if you didnt have to tune much for the cutout, that goes to show how free flowing that Evo TT must really be! Possibly since the valve slowly opens you might not get such an abrupt left shift in the boost curve. The charts will be very interesting!

Maybe I will resuse on injen SES exhaust again

Originally Posted by rrmedicx
I had about 3 gallons of 93 pump and added 10 gallons of E-85. I wasn't in the car so I don't know the actual %. Larry can advise.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #19  
shiftdrift06's Avatar
shiftdrift06
New Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 490
Likes: 1
From: Htown
Default

That is actually pretty neat, doesn't look to hard to construct one either. thumbs up in for video
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 02:21 PM
  #20  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by shiftdrift06
That is actually pretty neat, doesn't look to hard to construct one either. thumbs up in for video
Lots of trial and error by people who do this every day of the week. It's not easy. Now unless you are an exhaust fabricator, in that case, its probably easy.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 PM.