Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Bent rod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2010, 03:16 PM
  #21  
Chris@FsP
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (4)
 
Chris@FsP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you get it built, go with the 700BB turbos. Your powerband will be much better, IMO.
Old 09-04-2010, 03:24 PM
  #22  
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
Metal fatigue is cumulative, so bending a rod on the first pull is not surprising on a used stock DE motor, seeing over 300 wtq for the first time. Any other explanation is highly unlikely, imo. You all have too much faith in these wimpy rods!

I would recommend you go with one shop for everything so they can stand behind their work. Getting a mail order block to save a few blocks now may end up costing you a lot more in the long run. Based on several years of forum feedback, I've never heard bad things about Vinny Ten except that he's very busy. If he's willing to work with you to build the motor, I would accept the offer. It's all about your trust in him though. If there was someone in the area you trusted more, I presume you would've gone to them in the first place.
The stock DE rods aren't as wimpy as you state them to be. They aren't exactly GREAT either, but bending one on the very first 300+wtrq pull is just absurd. The stock DE rod is similar to the stock VW 1.8T rod and they can handle 350wtrq for extended periods of time on the stock bottom end...IN A FOUR CYLINDER.

Yes, metal fatigue is cumulative...but the engine has 100K miles....not 250K miles. As I've stated before....100K miles is NOTHING for an engine...it's just beginning to wear. The amount of people on these forums that have broken their engines in the 300whp/wtrq range is close to none. Those who have seem to be because of their tunes.
Old 09-04-2010, 06:00 PM
  #23  
BonesZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
BonesZ33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

high mileage does not cause a rod to bend.. A spun bearing WOULD be debateable.. But a bent rod is most likely due to detonation or some other form of a bad circumstance while tuning.
Old 09-04-2010, 08:07 PM
  #24  
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
rcdash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 6,474
Received 65 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
The stock DE rods aren't as wimpy as you state them to be. They aren't exactly GREAT either, but bending one on the very first 300+wtrq pull is just absurd. The stock DE rod is similar to the stock VW 1.8T rod and they can handle 350wtrq for extended periods of time on the stock bottom end...IN A FOUR CYLINDER.

Yes, metal fatigue is cumulative...but the engine has 100K miles....not 250K miles. As I've stated before....100K miles is NOTHING for an engine...it's just beginning to wear. The amount of people on these forums that have broken their engines in the 300whp/wtrq range is close to none. Those who have seem to be because of their tunes.
I have held my own in my hands and they look pretty pathetic to me! And you want to compare across platforms because the rods LOOK similar to you? This won't be the first time that stock DE rods have bent with FI, and on a first pull. We can just agree to disagree.

IN MY OPINION, if you're boosted on a stock DE motor, you're on borrowed time, plain and simple. Any other level of understanding is called denial. If you want to find fault elsewhere so that you can rationalize why you're motor isn't going to blow with your "safe" tune, that's all well and good... Have at it, and go right ahead and point fingers at the guy that tuned the fastest VQ car on the planet.

Last edited by rcdash; 09-04-2010 at 08:17 PM.
Old 09-04-2010, 08:59 PM
  #25  
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
I have held my own in my hands and they look pretty pathetic to me! And you want to compare across platforms because the rods LOOK similar to you? This won't be the first time that stock DE rods have bent with FI, and on a first pull. We can just agree to disagree.

IN MY OPINION, if you're boosted on a stock DE motor, you're on borrowed time, plain and simple. Any other level of understanding is called denial. If you want to find fault elsewhere so that you can rationalize why you're motor isn't going to blow with your "safe" tune, that's all well and good... Have at it, and go right ahead and point fingers at the guy that tuned the fastest VQ car on the planet.
You've held the rods of your DE? I've held rods of over 50 vehicles and have had rockwell hardness tests and shot peening done and what not on all kinds of rods. So what? It's not a pissing contest. OEM rods tend to all be pretty well made material wise...just by looking at them you can normally tell what's good and what's not so good. I'm not defending the VQ rod by saying it's a super strong rod...it's actually pretty weak....but it's not 300+lbft of torque on a single run weak.

I also never said he didn't know what he was doing....I said:

I know what happened, the tuner screwed up. It happens and it doesn't even mean he's a bad tuner
And I stand by it...

I broke an engine once...I blamed it on the engine being weak at first till I realized I screwed up on the calculations so my wideband could work on the gauge I was using. It happens...we're all only human.

Last edited by GT-ER; 09-04-2010 at 09:05 PM.
Old 09-04-2010, 09:02 PM
  #26  
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Double post!
Old 09-05-2010, 06:48 AM
  #27  
westpak
SFZCC
iTrader: (19)
 
westpak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
You've held the rods of your DE? I've held rods of over 50 vehicles and have had rockwell hardness tests and shot peening done and what not on all kinds of rods. So what? It's not a pissing contest. OEM rods tend to all be pretty well made material wise...just by looking at them you can normally tell what's good and what's not so good. I'm not defending the VQ rod by saying it's a super strong rod...it's actually pretty weak....but it's not 300+lbft of torque on a single run weak.

I also never said he didn't know what he was doing....I said:



And I stand by it...

I broke an engine once...I blamed it on the engine being weak at first till I realized I screwed up on the calculations so my wideband could work on the gauge I was using. It happens...we're all only human.
Come on, now you are just pulling stuff out of your ****, throwing around terms like hardness and shot penning LOL harness test will tell youpart of the story and shot penning is a process to make a part stornger but has nothing to do with the stock rods unless you do shot peen them and try to use them.

If you want to test a rod do a tensile test and even though it may not see much of a twist load do a torsion test and then you can see how the rod stands up, and you should really do a slew of them, maybe about 500-1000 of them to get a good cross section as with the manufacturing of the rods has acceptable flaws that are a result of the process which are probably acceptable to their manufacturing standards for an NA 300 hp car but not for 450hp boosted car, totally different loads seen on the rods.

So one rod may take 500 rwhp while the one next to it might break at 350rwhp or torque, it was made with 250RWHP in mind.

So stop your bs and accept that this kind of thing can happen and an owner going down this path should consider this as a possibility not go into blindly thinking a safe tune will keep them safe.

Last edited by westpak; 09-05-2010 at 06:50 AM.
Old 09-05-2010, 07:02 AM
  #28  
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by westpak
Come on, now you are just pulling stuff out of your ****, throwing around terms like hardness and shot penning LOL harness test will tell youpart of the story and shot penning is a process to make a part stornger but has nothing to do with the stock rods unless you do shot peen them and try to use them.

If you want to test a rod do a tensile test and even though it may not see much of a twist load do a torsion test and then you can see how the rod stands up, and you should really do a slew of them, maybe about 500-1000 of them to get a good cross section as with the manufacturing of the rods has acceptable flaws that are a result of the process which are probably acceptable to their manufacturing standards for an NA 300 hp car but not for 450hp boosted car, totally different loads seen on the rods.

So one rod may take 500 rwhp while the one next to it might break at 350rwhp or torque, it was made with 250RWHP in mind.

So stop your bs and accept that this kind of thing can happen and an owner going down this path should consider this as a possibility not go into blindly thinking a safe tune will keep them safe.
My brother and I used to race autocross in a class that forced us to use oem parts, but we could do anything we wanted as long as the parts were oem. But then again...what do I know...I just throw bs around.

Nothing is impossible...a bone stock car can throw a rod...a bone stock rod can handle a single 800whp run. Odds point more to the tuner screwing up than a rod bending on a SINGLE 300whp run.

If you believe otherwise, good for you. But I believe people here should start realizing that ALL ( ALL as in 100% of them ) tuners screw up...no matter how good they are and most blame their errors on the engines being weak to save themselves from looking bad. Heck, some won't even know they even made a mistake ( like what happened to me ).

In the end, it doesn't matter...op needs a new engine.

Last edited by GT-ER; 09-05-2010 at 07:36 AM.
Old 09-05-2010, 08:59 AM
  #29  
bigcloud
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
bigcloud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by westpak

So one rod may take 500 rwhp while the one next to it might break at 350rwhp or torque, it was made with 250RWHP in mind.
Westpak I agree with some of your post except for the quoted statement above. Logically an engineer would not design a part to almost the exact whp said part will be introduced to. An engineer would design a part to withstand higher whp. "If" that's the case "then" you would see failures most DE rods. I quoted the logic statements... We would not be able to boost to almost 400 wtq if they were designed to just 250rwhp.
Old 09-05-2010, 09:30 AM
  #30  
BonesZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
BonesZ33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

which leads us to a very logical question. How much power were the stock pistons really designed for?
Old 09-05-2010, 11:43 AM
  #31  
westpak
SFZCC
iTrader: (19)
 
westpak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigcloud
Westpak I agree with some of your post except for the quoted statement above. Logically an engineer would not design a part to almost the exact whp said part will be introduced to. An engineer would design a part to withstand higher whp. "If" that's the case "then" you would see failures most DE rods. I quoted the logic statements... We would not be able to boost to almost 400 wtq if they were designed to just 250rwhp.
I didn't mean to say it was designed for only 250 but that was the use in mind when it was designed and whatver safety factor they used it was with 250 or close in mind not making 400RWEHP.

what is that number what safety factor did they use 50%? 40%... I don't know but trying to find out by boosting the car is not the easiest way, say it is 50% they puts it at 375, what ever the number is we do not know and then you throw in manufacturing defects and it is a crapshoot when you boost the Z and get closer to whatever that number might be.

Basically anyone boosting a Z should be prepared for the possibility of failure and not be surprised when it happens or look to blame anyone else but themselves

Last edited by westpak; 09-05-2010 at 12:28 PM.
Old 09-05-2010, 01:49 PM
  #32  
coachk
Banned
iTrader: (21)
 
coachk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OP....by any chance were you there when they had it on the dyno? If so, what was the deal on your oil??? What about the plugs(new or old). It could be something as simple as OOOOOPS we forgot to add the oil after the TT install. It does happen sometimes.

HEY GUS..

Last edited by coachk; 09-05-2010 at 02:09 PM.
Old 09-05-2010, 02:13 PM
  #33  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Damn, that would suck. You would think it wouldn't even make it from the lift to the dyno if that were the case.
Old 09-05-2010, 04:30 PM
  #34  
Blueknight74
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Blueknight74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coachk
OP....by any chance were you there when they had it on the dyno? If so, what was the deal on your oil??? What about the plugs(new or old). It could be something as simple as OOOOOPS we forgot to add the oil after the TT install. It does happen sometimes.

HEY GUS..
no i was not there. They want me to pay the balance for the install $4500 yet i don't have a car to drive I just don't know what to do.
Old 09-05-2010, 07:05 PM
  #35  
IslandZavage
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
IslandZavage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South FLA
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

$4500 for just install or for total (tuning,install, etc...)?
Old 09-05-2010, 08:10 PM
  #36  
westpak
SFZCC
iTrader: (19)
 
westpak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coachk
OP....by any chance were you there when they had it on the dyno? If so, what was the deal on your oil??? What about the plugs(new or old). It could be something as simple as OOOOOPS we forgot to add the oil after the TT install. It does happen sometimes.

HEY GUS..
LOL hey Tom, glad to see you are OK
Old 09-05-2010, 09:13 PM
  #37  
zmedic16
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
zmedic16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: bronx new york
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blueknight74
no i was not there. They want me to pay the balance for the install $4500 yet i don't have a car to drive I just don't know what to do.
Well you agreed on a price for tuning, install , and labor.
Old 09-06-2010, 06:07 AM
  #38  
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Vas_Z33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: westchester NY
Posts: 1,709
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

OP this is a very expensive game. You gotta pay to play. as simple as that.
Old 09-06-2010, 06:23 AM
  #39  
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zmedic16
Well you agreed on a price for tuning, install , and labor.
Originally Posted by Vas_Z33
OP this is a very expensive game. You gotta pay to play. as simple as that.
I agree...
Old 09-06-2010, 07:28 AM
  #40  
Erdem
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Erdem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,296
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Blueknight74
no i was not there. They want me to pay the balance for the install $4500 yet i don't have a car to drive I just don't know what to do.
sorry to hear bro.. I'm in the same shoes as you at this moment...

but that's how it is with tuning... especially when you FI a stock NA car..

you can now share your experiences on the: "anyone regret going FI" Thread


Quick Reply: Bent rod



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 PM.