Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Most HP made with stock headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2011 | 06:37 AM
  #101  
bbs350z's Avatar
bbs350z
Registered User
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale AZ
Default

Originally Posted by bryan@momentum
Our headers have seen over 10k miles on the road course, with ZERO failures.

Our headers make good power on an NA car, and even better on an FI car.
this is what i like to see.

you guys ever look into sg's headers for example? almost twice the cost, and they have hundreds of hours into the design, R&D, fabrication, etc. but it works. proven gains, beaten to hell and still holding up strong. worth the price tag.

so imho, while the price may be a bit steep for these products, they are a 1 time investment. to me, that sells itself.
Old Feb 15, 2011 | 03:15 PM
  #102  
Resmarted's Avatar
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 64
From: ur face
Default

Originally Posted by bryan@momentum
Fair enough

again, fair enough

the fact that we are the only ST manufacturer that did make headers to work with our ST had something to do with it. but your view is valid, we can throw another motor together and do the same shot with manifolds, but man they are ugly.

the JIC manifolds you are talking about cost as much as our headers.

And what you are describing of fabbing your own turbo kit is a skill most don't have, nor do they want to afford a custom setup.
I've seen some very fast cars (mk3 supras, and sti's, even an evo) with ghetto *** silicon+hairspray fmic piping
I think it would be a bit easier than one would initially imagine: a lot of welding shops are dieing for work, charge by the hour and can make some very nice peices. Esp considering the guys that have been around for a while consider it an art, similar to your in-house welder .
Time is the real determining factor, plus when you build your own kit, you can use any turbos... Evo 8 turbos with upgraded turbines? Why not? Master power twins? Why not? Twin HX35's? Why not? Yes, most of those turbos wont spool anywhere near like a comparable output Precision or Garrett, but if you are paying nearly half the cost for the turbo's alone, it becomes a lot less of a big deal.
The JIC's are 1300, so yeah they are about the same as your headers. Although, the JIC's are probably the biggest and most difficult step to FI: the turbo manifold. Your headers bolt up to cats, so imo you really didnt get much accomplished, unless you plan on getting a header back turbo kit. Quite a gargantuan difference.
I will say though, of all the turbo kits out there, your is in my top 3 list, as well as the boosted performance kit. For me, its more about what has the future expandability/boost up potential. Would you guys consider doing a discount bundle on the headers if someone bought a turbo kit alongside it?

Last edited by Resmarted; Feb 15, 2011 at 03:15 PM. Reason: "your's is" raw redundancy
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 07:16 AM
  #103  
bryan@momentum's Avatar
bryan@momentum
Vendor - Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by Resmarted
I've seen some very fast cars (mk3 supras, and sti's, even an evo) with ghetto *** silicon+hairspray fmic piping
I think it would be a bit easier than one would initially imagine: a lot of welding shops are dieing for work, charge by the hour and can make some very nice peices. Esp considering the guys that have been around for a while consider it an art, similar to your in-house welder .
Time is the real determining factor, plus when you build your own kit, you can use any turbos... Evo 8 turbos with upgraded turbines? Why not? Master power twins? Why not? Twin HX35's? Why not? Yes, most of those turbos wont spool anywhere near like a comparable output Precision or Garrett, but if you are paying nearly half the cost for the turbo's alone, it becomes a lot less of a big deal.
The JIC's are 1300, so yeah they are about the same as your headers. Although, the JIC's are probably the biggest and most difficult step to FI: the turbo manifold. Your headers bolt up to cats, so imo you really didnt get much accomplished, unless you plan on getting a header back turbo kit. Quite a gargantuan difference.
I will say though, of all the turbo kits out there, your is in my top 3 list, as well as the boosted performance kit. For me, its more about what has the future expandability/boost up potential. Would you guys consider doing a discount bundle on the headers if someone bought a turbo kit alongside it?
Sorry Didn't mean to let this drop. I think we have proved the kit's potential, 516@15 psi on Hal's sandbagging dyno, 569@15 PSI on our dyno jet, the potential is there. We designed the turbo kit to be scalable. 400whp on a stock motor and 600 on a built motor.

Our headers bolt to cats on an NA car, but with our turbo kit they bolt to the merge piping to the turbo. No cats in the way. After the turbo it is a 3" down pipe and if you use our exhaust, a true 3" all the way to the exhaust tip.

as you can see here
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 09:22 AM
  #104  
jerryd87's Avatar
jerryd87
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 10
From: NE ohio
Default

is the single exhaust dual exit also three inch all the way back? i sent a email trying to find a sound clip of just the exhaust but got the exhuast video lol. im trying to find something without rasp for when i purchase mine so far most of the 3 inch single exhausts with dual exits have craptons of it =/ already planning on grabbin the headers after i get sasha paid off for my kit lol, wife needs to start working already >.<

Last edited by jerryd87; Mar 3, 2011 at 09:23 AM.
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 09:26 AM
  #105  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by jerryd87
is the single exhaust dual exit also three inch all the way back? i sent a email trying to find a sound clip of just the exhaust but got the exhuast video lol. im trying to find something without rasp for when i purchase mine so far most of the 3 inch single exhausts with dual exits have craptons of it =/ already planning on grabbin the headers after i get sasha paid off for my kit lol, wife needs to start working already >.<
Keep in mind that the turbo will act like a muffler, and you will not have any rasp at all. I ran (for test purposes) a straight 3" exhaust after the turbo and there was no rasp at all. Droning/loud, yes but no rasp.
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 10:05 AM
  #106  
bryan@momentum's Avatar
bryan@momentum
Vendor - Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by jerryd87
is the single exhaust dual exit also three inch all the way back? i sent a email trying to find a sound clip of just the exhaust but got the exhuast video lol. im trying to find something without rasp for when i purchase mine so far most of the 3 inch single exhausts with dual exits have craptons of it =/ already planning on grabbin the headers after i get sasha paid off for my kit lol, wife needs to start working already >.<
My bad, the dual exit is three inch until just past the diff, then it splits into dual 2.25"

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
Keep in mind that the turbo will act like a muffler, and you will not have any rasp at all. I ran (for test purposes) a straight 3" exhaust after the turbo and there was no rasp at all. Droning/loud, yes but no rasp.
+1, turbo = best muffler on the market, guaranteed to add power

Also does dampen the exhaust tones
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 11:41 AM
  #107  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

ask RcDash or Sharif if the turbos dampened my exhaust tone
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 04:30 PM
  #108  
bbs350z's Avatar
bbs350z
Registered User
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale AZ
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
ask RcDash or Sharif if the turbos dampened my exhaust tone
But your supercharged setup sounded absolutely insane and incredible!
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 06:08 PM
  #109  
jerryd87's Avatar
jerryd87
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 10
From: NE ohio
Default

*shrug* i might just try out straight pipes, im just skipping the recon permit so i gotta be careful. cars only gona be here two years before i leave so honolulu pd can eat a bag of *insert choice word here* lol
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 10:14 PM
  #110  
skakemokid's Avatar
skakemokid
Registered User
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 460
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
Default

^ doritos
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 07:30 AM
  #111  
thatv35guy's Avatar
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 59
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default

Back to the topic title… I found out a local Z with a built bottom end (stock heads & camshafts) made 450 whp on 11 psi with the PL 35R kit. The car had stock headers and stock exhaust at the time; this was also with AZ 91 octane pump gas.
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 07:44 AM
  #112  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by thatv35guy
Back to the topic title… I found out a local Z with a built bottom end (stock heads & camshafts) made 450 whp on 11 psi with the PL 35R kit. The car had stock headers and stock exhaust at the time; this was also with AZ 91 octane pump gas.
What brand dyno?
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 07:54 AM
  #113  
thatv35guy's Avatar
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 59
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by rh_334
What brand dyno?
Dynojet

My car has been on the same dyno too; most recently I made 353 whp on about 5 psi on that Dynojet.
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 07:57 AM
  #114  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by thatv35guy
Dynojet

My car has been on the same dyno too; most recently I made 353 whp on about 5 psi on that Dynojet.


Not doubting just asking for reference
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 04:41 PM
  #115  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

So, I have gathered some more data on all this header stuff. Two cars, identical kits and boost levels (10psi). Both cars were tuned well, and on the same type of dyno (DD). Both cars were stock DE's with one having aftermarket DC headers, and the other having OEM headers:

OEM header:




Aftermaket DC headers:



Now, I am not even looking at the max HP here, but the last 1000rpm where the engine is flowing the most exhaust gas. With the OEM headers you can see that after 5900rpm the HP curve starts to dive a bit, and this can only be do to restriction to flow. Now, looking at the DC headers dyno, the HP curve holds all the way to 7000rpm. To me this is a great example that suggests the OEM headers become a restriction at some point, even on a stock block.


NOTE: The second (404whp dyno) had an small exhaust leak, this is why the tq in the early rpm's was low, and timing was very conservative. Again, this is not a big deal, as I am looking at the charts after 5000rpm.

Last edited by Boosted Performance; Mar 14, 2011 at 04:58 PM.
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 05:21 AM
  #116  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
Both cars were tuned well, and on the same type of dyno (DD).
But we all know that the Dynosty DD reads ~10% lower than other DDs. And especially with these cars being tuned by a different person its not a very accurate comparison.

Edit: why does the 2nd graph say Vor? Vortech?

Last edited by rh_334; Mar 15, 2011 at 05:22 AM.
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 05:30 AM
  #117  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by rh_334
But we all know that the Dynosty DD reads ~10% lower than other DDs. And especially with these cars being tuned by a different person its not a very accurate comparison.
No, the Dynosty reads 13% lower than a Dyno Jet dyno, not lower than other DD dynos. Besides, I already stated that the max HP is not the point here, but only the grph in the upper RPM range.

Edit: why does the 2nd graph say Vor? Vortech? [/QUOTE]

Originally Posted by rh_334
Not sure, but that is a BP ST kit dyno. We all know that a Vortech graph will never have that hp/tq curve.
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 05:43 AM
  #118  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
No, the Dynosty reads 13% lower than a Dyno Jet dyno, not lower than other DD dynos. Besides, I already stated that the max HP is not the point here, but only the grph in the upper RPM range.

Edit: why does the 2nd graph say Vor? Vortech?
According to this (which is the only real comparison between Hal's DD and another i can find) the Dynosty DD reads ~10% lower than Forged Performance's

Originally Posted by bryan@momentum
Yeah Hal you have the heart breaker. we took our test Mule on the road for a week to show it to a few of our dealers. The results were as follows:

National Speed 395 rwhp (4 wheel Dyno jet)
Forged Performance 384 RWHP (4 wheel Dyno dynamics)
Z1 409 (2 wheel dyno jet)
Injected/Dynosty 349 (2 wheel dyno dynamics)

Sasha, not trying to hijack, but all dynos are not created equal and we saw some pretty good deviations in same brand dynos.

We used our car as the control and used pump gas a readily available, all of it 93 octane and our base Map tune out of the box. There was a 60 whp difference from all four dynos, and 24 whp difference between dynojets and 35 whp difference between the dyno dynamics.
Link
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 06:43 AM
  #119  
zmedic16's Avatar
zmedic16
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: bronx new york
Default

the point of the graph is not hp. but hp curve.. get it?
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 06:44 AM
  #120  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by rh_334
according to this (which is the only real comparison between hal's dd and another i can find) the dynosty dd reads ~10% lower than forged performance's



link


Originally Posted by boosted performance
no, the dynosty reads 13% lower than a dyno jet dyno, not lower than other dd dynos. Besides, i already stated that the max hp is not the point here, but only the garph in the upper rpm range.


Let's not get in to the whole hp/dymo debate again.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:48 AM.