Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

700whp with Eagle rods ????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2013 | 07:11 AM
  #1  
al_v's Avatar
al_v
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Chile
Default 700whp with Eagle rods ????

I know that is here some threads about this topic , but I really want to know eagle rods failure at what power levels.
I´m in 600whp now on DD ,but thinking in get bigger turbos....
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 09:10 AM
  #2  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

I think you could go 200hp per rod.. 700 should be no problem
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 09:31 AM
  #3  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Failed for str8dum1 at 900 whp.
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 09:45 AM
  #4  
NissanZguy's Avatar
NissanZguy
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Go "Manley Turbo Tuff H- Beams" if you want to make even more power without worries.

My .02

Good luck, sweet ride
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 10:10 AM
  #5  
al_v's Avatar
al_v
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Chile
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
Failed for str8dum1 at 900 whp.
This is way too much....... DD or DJ ??? At those levels the difference is around 150whp.
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 01:40 PM
  #6  
Resmarted's Avatar
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 64
From: ur face
Default

He failed 898whp while cruising (out of boost) uphill. The numbers were on dd.

Don't ask the forum this question, ask your engine builder this question. A lot more is in building the engine than what rods/pistons you use. Fwiw i have eagles in my car and i regret the decision. I wish now i had gone with billet steels by crower or carillos or something. Hal @ dynosty has eagles in his car. They aren't terrible, but you'll have limits. Most tuners/builders wouldn't reccomend running them over 600whp dd. Over that power level they are ticking time bombs really.
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 05:10 PM
  #7  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

I dont think I'd bother tearing apart the engine for 100whp gain. You're gonna need race gas or E85 to run 700whp, so that will keep your knock in check so it should be relatively safe

More interesting question is how are you planning to go to bigger turbos? bigger wheels in the APS housing, or chopping up the APS manifolds and going with different turbos?
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 06:33 PM
  #8  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by al_v
This is way too much....... DD or DJ ??? At those levels the difference is around 150whp.
They are RATED at 1500 chp in 6 cylinder applications per the manufacturer! 900 chp in 4 cyl applications! Clearly something is amiss. Could just have been a single weak rod?
Reply
Old May 8, 2013 | 04:40 AM
  #9  
Max Streets's Avatar
Max Streets
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Ny
Default

u should be fine with eagles for 700-750 keep under that and ur good,Manley h-beam is only a 30-50 $$ differance they are better than eagles my builder .02,i had eagles and he let me know.
Reply
Old May 8, 2013 | 11:53 AM
  #10  
al_v's Avatar
al_v
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Chile
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
I dont think I'd bother tearing apart the engine for 100whp gain. You're gonna need race gas or E85 to run 700whp, so that will keep your knock in check so it should be relatively safe

More interesting question is how are you planning to go to bigger turbos? bigger wheels in the APS housing, or chopping up the APS manifolds and going with different turbos?
I will try to fit a bigger turbos with the APS manifold , I´m thinking in the GT2871R with gt28r style compressor housing.....they are rated to 460hp each.
Reply
Old May 8, 2013 | 12:08 PM
  #11  
NissanZguy's Avatar
NissanZguy
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Max Streets
u should be fine with eagles for 700-750 keep under that and ur good,Manley h-beam is only a 30-50 $$ differance they are better than eagles my builder .02,i had eagles and he let me know.
My favorite combo is CP pistons with Manley Turbo Tuff Rods. Never had a failure with that combo.
Reply
Old May 8, 2013 | 01:59 PM
  #12  
Resmarted's Avatar
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 64
From: ur face
Default

Originally Posted by NissanZguy
My favorite combo is CP pistons with Manley Turbo Tuff Rods. Never had a failure with that combo.
Turbo tuffs are good but manleys and eagles have always been really comperable. A local builder told me the manleys are usually in better spec than the eagles. Eagles have a tendancy to be out of round on the big end still.

The difference between carillos and eagles isn't quite night and day, but it's easy to see which one would hold more power. This is a pic from dynosty comparing the two, im pretty sure the eagle rod is actually mine lol as that was exactly before my engine was done. Could be wrong but the point is still the same:
http://www.dynosty.com/2012/02/carrillo-rods-vs-eagle-rods/
And rods are inherintly weaker in our vq35 because of the rod stroke angle which causes for more extreme loads (vs like a 2j). We have a similar rod stroke ratio to a 4g63 so it looks like you can hold some good power in theory, BUT how power comes in/torque spiking on a single turbo 2 liter and how it comes on in a 900hp tt 3.5liter is pretty different.
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 08:18 PM
  #13  
Max Streets's Avatar
Max Streets
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Ny
Default

Originally Posted by Resmarted
Turbo tuffs are good but manleys and eagles have always been really comperable. A local builder told me the manleys are usually in better spec than the eagles. Eagles have a tendancy to be out of round on the big end still.

The difference between carillos and eagles isn't quite night and day, but it's easy to see which one would hold more power. This is a pic from dynosty comparing the two, im pretty sure the eagle rod is actually mine lol as that was exactly before my engine was done. Could be wrong but the point is still the same:
http://www.dynosty.com/2012/02/carri...vs-eagle-rods/
And rods are inherintly weaker in our vq35 because of the rod stroke angle which causes for more extreme loads (vs like a 2j). We have a similar rod stroke ratio to a 4g63 so it looks like you can hold some good power in theory, BUT how power comes in/torque spiking on a single turbo 2 liter and how it comes on in a 900hp tt 3.5liter is pretty different.
how different would be good to know
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 04:35 PM
  #14  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

I'm at 652 (plus a little extra since I raised boost another few lbs after the dyno session) on eagle rods and I'm not concerned about it. I wouldn't use them for a 1000+ build though.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 05:03 PM
  #15  
jerryd87's Avatar
jerryd87
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 10
From: NE ohio
Default

just looking at them you can see they are substantially beefier, they have a higher quality on the machine work and better chamfers, the carillo will undoubtedly be a better forging process and base material quality and i also believe the carillos are shot peened and eagle are not from the factory which will relieve stress risers.
Originally Posted by Max Streets
how different would be good to know
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 05:28 PM
  #16  
Max Streets's Avatar
Max Streets
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Ny
Default

sorry i meant a 2.0 from a 3.5 900hp
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 09:29 PM
  #17  
jerryd87's Avatar
jerryd87
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 10
From: NE ohio
Default

torque generated will come on much quicker and harder on the 3.5L however its not just torque its also speed and the 2.0 is going to be spinning higher. theoretically speaking 900 hp in either one will produce the same stresses if they had the same number of cylinders. however since the 2.0 is a 4 it is seeing much higher stresses then the 3.5L
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
gc350z03
Forced Induction
114
Oct 28, 2016 05:00 PM
aboodi
Forced Induction
8
Oct 28, 2015 02:07 PM
pr_350z
Maintenance & Repair
2
Oct 1, 2015 05:03 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 AM.