Twin Turbo System completed! 402 WHP @ 6.4 Lbs
04-01-2004, 12:35 PM
#81
Originally posted by SSR Engineering
Oh and when we dynoed, we dynoed in 3rd gear, not 4th where there is the 1:1 ratio and the most power. So theoretically this kit could still produce another 10-15-20WHP in 4th gear @ 6.4 PSI
Oh and when we dynoed, we dynoed in 3rd gear, not 4th where there is the 1:1 ratio and the most power. So theoretically this kit could still produce another 10-15-20WHP in 4th gear @ 6.4 PSI
04-01-2004, 01:12 PM
#82
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MIAPLAYA
Bump for melted pistons
Bump for melted pistons
04-01-2004, 01:13 PM
#83
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by booger
Every time I have dynoed my car [g35 AT5] I got a couple less whp in 4th gear than in 3rd gear
Every time I have dynoed my car [g35 AT5] I got a couple less whp in 4th gear than in 3rd gear
04-01-2004, 01:15 PM
#84
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by spazpilot
SSR Engineering
I see that you enjoy bashing other companies. Not smart if you ask me. Greddy did not blow up an engine, they ended up destroying the wire harness throughout there R&D by trying to use the timing feature on the emange, which I heard some companies have it working. Not bad for a company who was one of the first to build a turbo kit for the car. Top Secret on the other hand lives on the edge, and that is what they do. They pushed there OWN CAR to the limits to see what the motor can handle. PE only runs there car at 4psi because of lack of timing out of the box. these companies have been building and working on these kits since the car came out. It took greddy a year to come out with the kit since we first heard of it. If you were to call greddy and ask about raising the boost above the 5.7, the first thing they say is that you might want to invest in some kind of timing control.
SSR Engineering
I see that you enjoy bashing other companies. Not smart if you ask me. Greddy did not blow up an engine, they ended up destroying the wire harness throughout there R&D by trying to use the timing feature on the emange, which I heard some companies have it working. Not bad for a company who was one of the first to build a turbo kit for the car. Top Secret on the other hand lives on the edge, and that is what they do. They pushed there OWN CAR to the limits to see what the motor can handle. PE only runs there car at 4psi because of lack of timing out of the box. these companies have been building and working on these kits since the car came out. It took greddy a year to come out with the kit since we first heard of it. If you were to call greddy and ask about raising the boost above the 5.7, the first thing they say is that you might want to invest in some kind of timing control.
04-01-2004, 01:17 PM
#85
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by spazpilot
SSR Engineering
I see that you enjoy bashing other companies. Not smart if you ask me. Greddy did not blow up an engine, they ended up destroying the wire harness throughout there R&D by trying to use the timing feature on the emange, which I heard some companies have it working. Not bad for a company who was one of the first to build a turbo kit for the car. Top Secret on the other hand lives on the edge, and that is what they do. They pushed there OWN CAR to the limits to see what the motor can handle. PE only runs there car at 4psi because of lack of timing out of the box. these companies have been building and working on these kits since the car came out. It took greddy a year to come out with the kit since we first heard of it. If you were to call greddy and ask about raising the boost above the 5.7, the first thing they say is that you might want to invest in some kind of timing control.
SSR Engineering
I see that you enjoy bashing other companies. Not smart if you ask me. Greddy did not blow up an engine, they ended up destroying the wire harness throughout there R&D by trying to use the timing feature on the emange, which I heard some companies have it working. Not bad for a company who was one of the first to build a turbo kit for the car. Top Secret on the other hand lives on the edge, and that is what they do. They pushed there OWN CAR to the limits to see what the motor can handle. PE only runs there car at 4psi because of lack of timing out of the box. these companies have been building and working on these kits since the car came out. It took greddy a year to come out with the kit since we first heard of it. If you were to call greddy and ask about raising the boost above the 5.7, the first thing they say is that you might want to invest in some kind of timing control.
04-01-2004, 02:09 PM
#86
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: OC
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SSR Engineering
We aren't bashing on any companies, or saying any of them are wrong. Greddy's standard turbo kit DOES NOT have timing control, and they are running .7 less boost then we are. If I compared to any other companies I was just pointing out the fact that we have addressed the fuel supply issue completely and made an alternative which in result is more expensive but there is alot more security in the kit.
We aren't bashing on any companies, or saying any of them are wrong. Greddy's standard turbo kit DOES NOT have timing control, and they are running .7 less boost then we are. If I compared to any other companies I was just pointing out the fact that we have addressed the fuel supply issue completely and made an alternative which in result is more expensive but there is alot more security in the kit.
04-01-2004, 02:13 PM
#87
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RIVET
Trust me, dumping more fuel in is not the solution and frankly makes me question your methods. Don't you think companies with a lot more experience in the industry(Greddy/Trust, Vortech etc. ) would have figured that out by now? You'll see.
Trust me, dumping more fuel in is not the solution and frankly makes me question your methods. Don't you think companies with a lot more experience in the industry(Greddy/Trust, Vortech etc. ) would have figured that out by now? You'll see.
04-01-2004, 02:19 PM
#88
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SSR Engineering
As I stated previously, your purpose must only be for trolling here, as many of the things you stated were non-factual. JWT is right down the street and they wanted to see the block. catastrophic rod failure was the cause not melted pistons (which is a result from detonation), which you can ask the techs at JWT as being a result from prior nitrous use. Catastrophic rod failure can stem from stress fractures from Nitrous abuse. Like I said to you in other posts, if you want to talk about a sentra make a new post in off-topic, or call us, or PM us, or e-mail us, or fax us or whatever.
As I stated previously, your purpose must only be for trolling here, as many of the things you stated were non-factual. JWT is right down the street and they wanted to see the block. catastrophic rod failure was the cause not melted pistons (which is a result from detonation), which you can ask the techs at JWT as being a result from prior nitrous use. Catastrophic rod failure can stem from stress fractures from Nitrous abuse. Like I said to you in other posts, if you want to talk about a sentra make a new post in off-topic, or call us, or PM us, or e-mail us, or fax us or whatever.
04-01-2004, 02:28 PM
#90
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SSR Engineering
04-01-2004, 02:33 PM
#93
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MIAPLAYA
Looks just like the dyno shop in Santee. Further proof that the car is in Cali while you are in AZ. i guess there are no dyno shops between here and there. That or what I'm saying is true....you did NO work on this.
Looks just like the dyno shop in Santee. Further proof that the car is in Cali while you are in AZ. i guess there are no dyno shops between here and there. That or what I'm saying is true....you did NO work on this.
04-01-2004, 02:34 PM
#94
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SSR Engineering
Just because we have a retail location in Arizona can't mean we do our fabrication in California?
Just because we have a retail location in Arizona can't mean we do our fabrication in California?
04-01-2004, 02:44 PM
#96
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MIAPLAYA
dude seriously, you want me to link the thread from B15 where about 4 billion board members asked you where you were and questioned some of the other work you CLAIMED you did and all you could say was you outsourced. Don't get clowned
dude seriously, you want me to link the thread from B15 where about 4 billion board members asked you where you were and questioned some of the other work you CLAIMED you did and all you could say was you outsourced. Don't get clowned
04-01-2004, 02:46 PM
#97
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SSR Engineering
Yeah, you caught us we are guilty of the ultimate biblical sin. Blowing up a sentra motor
. It seems you avoid my questions as do those on other forums. If sub-par tuning resulted in a blown motor why did it blow up on the first run at a 10:1 a/f ratio. If you know a thing or two about cars you'll realize that 10:1 is extremely rich and detonation would be as likely as getting struck by lightning. Enough arguing about it.
The reason I can tell your here just to troll around and be an ***, is because you didnt give us any credit for making a 402WHP G35. The facts are in front of you, it made 402WHP theres a chart, and it's still running.
Yeah, you caught us we are guilty of the ultimate biblical sin. Blowing up a sentra motor
. It seems you avoid my questions as do those on other forums. If sub-par tuning resulted in a blown motor why did it blow up on the first run at a 10:1 a/f ratio. If you know a thing or two about cars you'll realize that 10:1 is extremely rich and detonation would be as likely as getting struck by lightning. Enough arguing about it. The reason I can tell your here just to troll around and be an ***, is because you didnt give us any credit for making a 402WHP G35. The facts are in front of you, it made 402WHP theres a chart, and it's still running.
Heres the thread with videos of the completed "turbo" Spec V http://www.b15sentra.net/forums/show...sr+engineering
Heres the thread that claims this was the FIRST dyno run; http://www.b15sentra.net/forums/show...sr+engineering
Heres the thread where you claim its ready to go:
http://www.b15sentra.net/forums/show...sr+engineering
Heres the thread where it blew up and you tried covering your @ss: http://www.b15sentra.net/forums/show...sr+engineering
Oh and this thread says IT ALL: http://www.b15sentra.net/forums/show...sr+engineering
04-01-2004, 02:47 PM
#98
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like a good idea. But then again putting wheels on a refrigerator and driving it down the f@cking street sounds like a good idea to someone
04-01-2004, 02:49 PM
#99
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, MiaPlaya you've made your point.
To the topic at hand... That dyno doesn't say SAE corrected and I've never heard of a Dyno Dynamic dynamometer. But that's really beside the point.
The real point is that there have been *several* documented cases of professionally tuned cars blowing up motors at 7 psi and at least one I know of that blew up at 6 psi. One can speculate as to the reason--but I'm not alone when I opine that an A/F ratio of 11.5 without any timing retard seems insufficient conservative protection all by itself.
Also, not all dyno machines get better HP results in 4th gear (or 5th for the manual tranny).
--Steve
To the topic at hand... That dyno doesn't say SAE corrected and I've never heard of a Dyno Dynamic dynamometer. But that's really beside the point.
The real point is that there have been *several* documented cases of professionally tuned cars blowing up motors at 7 psi and at least one I know of that blew up at 6 psi. One can speculate as to the reason--but I'm not alone when I opine that an A/F ratio of 11.5 without any timing retard seems insufficient conservative protection all by itself.
Also, not all dyno machines get better HP results in 4th gear (or 5th for the manual tranny).
--Steve
04-01-2004, 02:49 PM
#100
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by slay2k
rofl... MIA you bein a little too aggressive maybe ? Take it easy man..
rofl... MIA you bein a little too aggressive maybe ? Take it easy man..