KJR Performance Crank Pulley
02-27-2006, 03:48 PM
#21
Premier Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston and Austin, TX
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MySunset350Z
i think that was meant as a joke. right?
your car would rev up like a small 4 banger. very very slowly. hp and tq would be greatly reduced.
minimizing rotational mass is what milks out the few extra hp and tq. also, centripital acceleration plays a role which is affected by the diameter of the pulley.
your car would rev up like a small 4 banger. very very slowly. hp and tq would be greatly reduced.
minimizing rotational mass is what milks out the few extra hp and tq. also, centripital acceleration plays a role which is affected by the diameter of the pulley.
no it wasnt a joke. what i am trying to say is that adding mass to the FW/CP will reduce power, right? So won't it make power if you take weight off? alot of those guys in the thread were stating that reducing drivetrain mass doesnt "make power".
i think they are wrong....
02-27-2006, 07:50 PM
#22
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: calgary
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by truplay8
02-27-2006, 08:08 PM
#23
Originally Posted by 99atlantic
that's like dyno'ing a flywheel and expecting to see mad power from it....you won't, it doesn't work that way (it won't show up on the dyno)
if that was true then the UR crank pulley shouldnt see any gains either but it does
02-27-2006, 09:04 PM
#25
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that dyno cant be right, but regardless, dyno or no dyno -- how would removing about four pounds of weight off the crank not be beneficial to performance ...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
11-09-2020 10:27 AM
