G35 11.5 sec + DYNO
04-04-2004, 10:53 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: **** off
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
G35 11.5 sec + DYNO
not my g35, but a friend of mine
http://www.streetneeds.com/ttnet/up/...20x%20403).jpg
http://www.streetneeds.com/ttnet/up/...20x%20515).jpg
mods:
HKS 2835 BB Turbos
Aquamist Water Injection
Tial 40mm wastegates
Tial 50mm BOVs
Custom 4.5" Bell FMIC
Custom Manifolds,
Custom 3" Downpipes
Custom 3" testpipes
Port/Polished heads
Tomei 268 x 10.5mm Cams
SGP SST Valves
SGP Racing Titanium Retainers
Apexi AVC-R Boost controller
APEXi S-AFC Fuel controller
OS Giken Dual Disc Clutch Kit
JWT Aluminum Flywheel (will switch back to stock soon)
JIC Coilovers
19" Volk Racing SF Challengers
INJEN CAI
Stillen SS Cat-back
http://www.streetneeds.com/ttnet/up/...20x%20403).jpg
http://www.streetneeds.com/ttnet/up/...20x%20515).jpg
mods:
HKS 2835 BB Turbos
Aquamist Water Injection
Tial 40mm wastegates
Tial 50mm BOVs
Custom 4.5" Bell FMIC
Custom Manifolds,
Custom 3" Downpipes
Custom 3" testpipes
Port/Polished heads
Tomei 268 x 10.5mm Cams
SGP SST Valves
SGP Racing Titanium Retainers
Apexi AVC-R Boost controller
APEXi S-AFC Fuel controller
OS Giken Dual Disc Clutch Kit
JWT Aluminum Flywheel (will switch back to stock soon)
JIC Coilovers
19" Volk Racing SF Challengers
INJEN CAI
Stillen SS Cat-back
Last edited by aznkukuboi; 04-04-2004 at 10:56 PM.
04-05-2004, 08:50 AM
#7
Charter Member #34
Join Date: May 2002
Location: -
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
things that are weird to me....
i am pretty sure the OS Giken Clutch cannot be used with the stock flywheel (or JWT flywheel). i know this cause i have one. they need to be used with the supplied flywheel!
the other wierd thing is the torque produced is nowhere close to resembling what twin-turbo 350Z guys are getting...
also, on the dyno chart the RPM/MPH is 50.... this means at 6000rpm, he was doing 120mph. by the fact it has a clutch, i assume it is a g35c 6speed... well, in this case the weird thing is our 4th gear ratio should be 60 rpm/mph and 5th gear is 46.5 rpm/mph... i don't see how he got 50....
anyone else suspicious?
m
i am pretty sure the OS Giken Clutch cannot be used with the stock flywheel (or JWT flywheel). i know this cause i have one. they need to be used with the supplied flywheel!
the other wierd thing is the torque produced is nowhere close to resembling what twin-turbo 350Z guys are getting...
also, on the dyno chart the RPM/MPH is 50.... this means at 6000rpm, he was doing 120mph. by the fact it has a clutch, i assume it is a g35c 6speed... well, in this case the weird thing is our 4th gear ratio should be 60 rpm/mph and 5th gear is 46.5 rpm/mph... i don't see how he got 50....
anyone else suspicious?
m
Trending Topics
04-05-2004, 09:53 AM
#8
Banned
iTrader: (34)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: I'm A Gypsy
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, I'm very suspicious... especially because power peaks at about 4500rpm. That is simply not accurate for a vq35. My bet is that the G ran the 14.7 and it was an LS1 or something that ran the 11.5...
1) The power curve is wrong
2) The 60' time is amazing given that the g/z doesn't launch that well
3) No pictures
4) He has an Injen CAI with twin turbos...
5) If he really is in california, lots more people would know about this car and would have seen the 1/4 time
1) The power curve is wrong
2) The 60' time is amazing given that the g/z doesn't launch that well
3) No pictures
4) He has an Injen CAI with twin turbos...
5) If he really is in california, lots more people would know about this car and would have seen the 1/4 time
04-05-2004, 09:54 AM
#9
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ha Ha I always love the Injen CAI and a twin turbo setup. I also love a 1.7 60' on 19 inchers with street tires.. I would love to see the fuel setup also.. The clutch point is very interesting...
I will call BS on this..
Sounds like a dumb person trying to impress people with a fake setup.. I wont believe a word you say unless you show me pics and a video of this run!!
It took someone a 300 shot of Nitrous and slicks to run a 11.38. So add 250 HP from stock ( I believe that was his stock dyno) and add 300 and you get about 550 RWHP. Now you did what he did with 400 HP. I hate stupid people..
Here is another thread on this B.S.
Thread
I will call BS on this..
Sounds like a dumb person trying to impress people with a fake setup.. I wont believe a word you say unless you show me pics and a video of this run!!
It took someone a 300 shot of Nitrous and slicks to run a 11.38. So add 250 HP from stock ( I believe that was his stock dyno) and add 300 and you get about 550 RWHP. Now you did what he did with 400 HP. I hate stupid people..
Here is another thread on this B.S.
Thread
Last edited by infidsg35; 04-05-2004 at 10:04 AM.
04-05-2004, 05:55 PM
#10
If it is true that this car ran that fast.....which is hard to believe...he will not be able to run at that track again with out installing a roll cage and prob. some other safety equipment . u cant run faster than 12 sec. with out safety equipment .
04-05-2004, 06:02 PM
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: **** off
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm
i think he had other mods but didnt update wut the had...
i remember his dyno
when he waz back in the early stages he waz only pulling 340 at the wheels
and maybe he had nitrous shot that i dont know about
i think he had other mods but didnt update wut the had...
i remember his dyno
when he waz back in the early stages he waz only pulling 340 at the wheels
and maybe he had nitrous shot that i dont know about
04-05-2004, 09:07 PM
#12
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: **** off
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is wut he said himself:
"My boost controller is set at 12 psi but i rarely reach full boost while daily driving. car is fully tuned at 11 psi.
If you are ever in Sacramento, come by Sacramento Raceway. Im there every other wednseday(for racing) and every other friday (Test n Tune). Only way to prove my times. Not gonna waste 500 bucks for a digital camcorder "
enuff said
"My boost controller is set at 12 psi but i rarely reach full boost while daily driving. car is fully tuned at 11 psi.
If you are ever in Sacramento, come by Sacramento Raceway. Im there every other wednseday(for racing) and every other friday (Test n Tune). Only way to prove my times. Not gonna waste 500 bucks for a digital camcorder "
enuff said
04-06-2004, 04:12 PM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm...the same post as the same response that was put up on G35DRIVER.COM. I am glad others weren't suckered by this. Here were my comments:
Somethings up with this. Sorry, but the dyno doesn't match the timeslip. The problem is that if the same car that did the dyno running the same configuration at the track could not possibly run a 125 trap. There is a NHRA formula for calculating hp that is extremely accurate. That trap speed would have required about 558 flywheel hp or 480+ rwhp. A much lighter 3100 lb ZO6 with boltons putting out 420 rwhp can't even get close to that trap. Jotech's 432 rwhp 350Z-TT can't come close either. Whether you are on slicks or street tires, there is little difference in traps; just ETs. With 400 rwhp in a 3500 lb car, you can only get a 116-117 trap.
Looking at the torque curves, it can't be a VQ35. Look at how low the torque is at 2-2500 rpms. Obviously the car is at WOT, but even off-boost the torque should be over 200 ft-lb. A stock car puts out 220 lb-ft at this point. If you look at any of the Greddy or SSR dynos, they are even well above that at low rpms. Then look at the torque and HP peaks. Even if a boost controller is used; once the wastegate opens, the torque curve will flatten until the cams run out and power curve will continue to rise until the cams and heads max out. Because the Torque is still rising past 4000 rpms, this would only be possible with a very large turbo/turbos on the engine. That turbo spools awfully slow in the graph. But then the power falls quickly with the engine running out of breath above 5000 rpms, unlike a boosted VQ that powers into the redline. What's even more strange is that the dyno looks EXACTLY like a stock cam KA24(not much torque on the bottom end or much reving on the top end) 240SX with a big turbo kit on it. Hmm....
Somethings up with this. Sorry, but the dyno doesn't match the timeslip. The problem is that if the same car that did the dyno running the same configuration at the track could not possibly run a 125 trap. There is a NHRA formula for calculating hp that is extremely accurate. That trap speed would have required about 558 flywheel hp or 480+ rwhp. A much lighter 3100 lb ZO6 with boltons putting out 420 rwhp can't even get close to that trap. Jotech's 432 rwhp 350Z-TT can't come close either. Whether you are on slicks or street tires, there is little difference in traps; just ETs. With 400 rwhp in a 3500 lb car, you can only get a 116-117 trap.
Looking at the torque curves, it can't be a VQ35. Look at how low the torque is at 2-2500 rpms. Obviously the car is at WOT, but even off-boost the torque should be over 200 ft-lb. A stock car puts out 220 lb-ft at this point. If you look at any of the Greddy or SSR dynos, they are even well above that at low rpms. Then look at the torque and HP peaks. Even if a boost controller is used; once the wastegate opens, the torque curve will flatten until the cams run out and power curve will continue to rise until the cams and heads max out. Because the Torque is still rising past 4000 rpms, this would only be possible with a very large turbo/turbos on the engine. That turbo spools awfully slow in the graph. But then the power falls quickly with the engine running out of breath above 5000 rpms, unlike a boosted VQ that powers into the redline. What's even more strange is that the dyno looks EXACTLY like a stock cam KA24(not much torque on the bottom end or much reving on the top end) 240SX with a big turbo kit on it. Hmm....
04-06-2004, 07:54 PM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brentwood, N.Y.
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With 400 rwhp in a 3500 lb car, you can only get a 116-117 trap
every thing is not as simple as it seems.. i have a little under 400rwhp in my tt supra(auto) and i trap 118-119 and my car weighs 3700 lbs with me in it( i know what it weighs cause we have scales.) i'm just refering to what you stated above, whether or not this guy's g35 is for real, i have no idea.. jay
every thing is not as simple as it seems.. i have a little under 400rwhp in my tt supra(auto) and i trap 118-119 and my car weighs 3700 lbs with me in it( i know what it weighs cause we have scales.) i'm just refering to what you stated above, whether or not this guy's g35 is for real, i have no idea.. jay
04-06-2004, 09:44 PM
#19
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
aznkukuboi is a pretender, he goes onto G35 sites and talks about stuff that is not true and he claims to own a G35.
I am pretty sure that dyno doesnt' belong to his friend or it mite not even be a g35 dyno. it's prolly a dyno graph he saw it somewhere on the net and d/l.
go to g35driver.com and you will see aznkukuboi being a pretender being discussed
I am pretty sure that dyno doesnt' belong to his friend or it mite not even be a g35 dyno. it's prolly a dyno graph he saw it somewhere on the net and d/l.
go to g35driver.com and you will see aznkukuboi being a pretender being discussed
04-06-2004, 09:49 PM
#20
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: **** off
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts